972
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Randelung@lemmy.world 116 points 5 days ago

They had Skype! It was the verb for video calling for god's sake! How do you LOSE so BADLY so CONSISTENTLY and STILL have investors.

[-] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 5 days ago

Business, government, and military contracts. Doesn't matter how crappy you are, as long as you promise to be the fall-guy when a insert large entity has a insert large tech problem, they'll keep shoveling money at you.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Dadifer@lemmy.world 222 points 6 days ago

Microsoft never fails to disappoint

[-] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 79 points 6 days ago

Huh. I guess Microsoft and I have that in common.

🥁

[-] the_joeba@lemmy.world 47 points 6 days ago

You forgot the symbol crash at the end. How disappointing.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] marcos@lemmy.world 168 points 6 days ago

Lol! Be like GitLab instead:

1 - Be the underdog with good reputation in a market completely monopolized;

2 - Have the incumbent self-destruct by vibecoding its product and pushing AI above every other feature to its customers;

3 - Loudly announce that you are leaving your past good behavior behind, and that you are betting everything on vibecoding and pushing AI to your customers!

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] curiousaur@reddthat.com 121 points 5 days ago

It is truly, deeply amazing how bad Microsoft is. Proton on Linux is FASTER than the actual directX it's emulating is on windows. They got beat at their own instruction layer.

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 71 points 5 days ago

And they had Skype, which was practically a genericized trademark for "video call--" until first Apple's FaceTime and then Zoom utterly took them apart.

And they had Office, which defined the product category so completely that it's called "office software--" but then Google Docs took them apart on a molecular level.

Microsoft is the king of snatching defeat from the clutching jaws of victory.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 45 points 5 days ago

but then Google Docs took them apart

Tapping the breaks on that one.

Google Docs is very lightweight, but it's also very stripped down. Word remains the first choice in word processors for 90% of the market. It (and Excel) are a big reason offices haven't seriously begun abandoning Microsoft.

[-] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 1 points 2 days ago

Not being able to paste a jpg of a screenshot into an Excel sheet embedded in a Word document is a feature.

I posit that the vast majority of users of Office would be just fine with any of the lightweight web app equivalents.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I think we'll eventually see folks migrate to Jupiter Notebook style data entry and management. But they're relatively new and not well-integrated into modern workflows.

For the time being, people are brought into offices and trained on Excel, get comfortable with Excel, and continue to use Excel because that's how they spend the bulk of their hours. You've got networking effect and priors cementing these apps as the go-to for an entire generation.

[-] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 day ago

100%

Excel is the one actual critical application because it deals with data (and formulae), data which is only useful when you maintain its integrity (hopefully you're not storing dates).

Word is just a shitty application for text. Needs that can usually be adequately addressed by a plain text file (or plain text email). It thinks it's a desktop publishing application (goodbye MS Publisher). Any tool that can do rudimentary text processing will suffice for the vast majority of use cases. One might have footnotes and some meta data that might be important, other apps do that well. Even markdown can do that.

PowerPoint, likewise, is a shitty slide show application. Any equivalent will suffice.

There's quite a few other apps, I forget those.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

Word is just a shitty application for text.

It's fine. People love to shit on the app because Microsoft Bad. But it's living at the rough midpoint of application quality, at least in it's modern incarnation.

PowerPoint, likewise, is a shitty slide show application.

As a slideshow app, it's another perfectly fine piece of software.

What's disgusting about PowerPoint isn't the app but the LinkedIn psychos who use it

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 20 points 5 days ago

Microsoft acquired Skype, did not create it. Then destryed it with its own hands.

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago

They acquired practically everything they have. They haven't created anything truly new since the mid-90s.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] eatham@aussie.zone 13 points 5 days ago

Google docs is far worse than office, in every way except for collaboration. It does not destroy them at all. LibreOffice is on par except for having no collaboration, but is not widely used so definitely haven't destroyed them. Office is still very successful and probably won't be gone anytime soon

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] red_tomato@lemmy.world 15 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

They also had Internet Explorer. When it was released it was actually good (compared to the competition). Internet Explorer was dominant, but then it turned into the punching bag of web browser memes.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[-] 3abas@lemmy.world 30 points 5 days ago

Proton (and Wine, what it's based on) are not emulators. They are compatibility layers, it translates Windows system calls to native Linux system calls.

[-] Kaiserschmarrn@feddit.org 31 points 5 days ago

Or simply put: Wine Is Not an Emulator

[-] luciferofastora@feddit.org 18 points 5 days ago

That isn't "simply put". It's a witty way to phrase half the comment, completely omitting the other half that actually explains what it does. WINE is a clever abbreviation as a name for the tool, but the opposite of descriptive about its purpose or function.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)

That's Microsoft. They got desktop PCs. They repeatedly failed to get mobile, they repeatedly failed to get portable, they never had embedded, they had fucking Skype at one point. They drink gold and piss nickel, Microsoft.

[-] magnue@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago

Don't forget Vine was basically tiktok and they just binned it for no reason.

[-] Manalith@midwest.social 3 points 4 days ago

Also Zune was a fantastic player.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] bitwolf@sh.itjust.works 28 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

~~invent copilot~~

Rebrand ChatGPT

Ftfy

[-] lambipapp@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago

Naah, the initial GitHub copilot was something else.

[-] Sinthesis@lemmy.today 11 points 5 days ago

I was on the Github Copilot Technical Preview (invite in my mailbox says July 16th 2021) and it was GPT-3 (not to be confused with ChatGPT which was introduced with GPT-4)

[-] ErmahgherdDavid@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

ChatGPT was built on top of GPT-3.5 which was GPT3 with the new seep reinforcement learning to make it more "conversational", launched 2022. GPT 4 launched in 2023 and before the official launch there was "I have been a good Bing. 😊" Which was.. checks notes... microsoft messing something up again

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] getFrog@piefed.social 38 points 5 days ago

you literally have access to all the code in the world

I'd like to believe that they were honorable enough to not secretly train on code without people's permission. But realistically they totally did exactly that, but just made the AI Model this incompetent through some other engineering blunder.

Also, random side thought - training only on public repos probably yields you way higher code quality as opposed to training on both public and private repos? I assume we all have some very messy private repos that we're too embarrassed to publish because the code quality is absolute shit ... right?

[-] drath@lemmy.drath.ru 17 points 5 days ago

They didn't check licenses in any way, as it did reproduce the famous quake fast inverse square root function, comments included. And quake, like majority of github projects, is published under GPL, which requires all copies and modifications to be published under GPL as well, after which all sane enterprises have banned copilot usage.

Though, we're not living in sane times anymore. Chatgpt, gemini, deepseek, claude, all reproduce copylefted code left and right. Realistically, Stallman should've been rolling in cash by now...

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] belated_frog_pants@beehaw.org 14 points 5 days ago

honorable enough

Lol. Lmao

[-] Azzu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I'm always so extremely confused about the trope of the personal project having shit quality... Like, if I'm doing something for myself, that's exactly the place where I wanna do something amazing, like literally all my private projects have much higher quality than my work ones - because in the work ones I'm forced to use stupid conventions, old tools, am not supposed to touch "legacy" code, etc etc etc

As such, since companies have their private code on GitHub, that's where I would expect the shittiness to come from, not personal private projects.

[-] getFrog@piefed.social 13 points 5 days ago

Like, if I'm doing something for myself, that's exactly the place where I wanna do something amazing,

That's always my intention with my personal projects too! But that always results in "Wow I just learned how to do this thing much better, let me refactor the whole project to do it perfectly everywhere" followed by my Adderall running out. So there's just so many half-done refactors I either forget about or abandon because I get a new idea the next day, but that's totally just a skill issue.

You're right though, the code I write at work is much worse, but my Company hosts their own GitLab instance so the code we write can't even be used to poison Copilot :(

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] red_tomato@lemmy.world 77 points 6 days ago

Their idea was that OpenAI was so far ahead of the competition no one could ever catch up. Turns out they weren’t and now they’re at the bottom.

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io 25 points 6 days ago

Google: "We Have No Moat, And Neither Does OpenAI". Prophetic words.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] trashboat@piefed.social 48 points 5 days ago

Just like Skype getting lapped by Zoom during COVID

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 32 points 5 days ago

Have all the code in the world

Create LLM for software development

Try to advertise it

Oops, no budget

Get acquired by Microsoft

Enshittification ensues

Everyone else loots your code repos

Microsoft tries to put your coding tool in everything

Coding tool injected into Excel

Into Word

Into Teams Chat

Nobody knows what this is even supposed to do anymore

Copilot now synonymous with Clippy

Yeah, can't even begin to imagine how this happened.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Manalith@midwest.social 6 points 4 days ago

The fact that it can't even get PowerShell right when it should be intimately familiar with PowerShell commands and scripts is absolutely asinine.

[-] Bloefz@lemmy.world 40 points 6 days ago

It's weird because copilot in office tries to push agents on you as if it were a Jehovah's witness.

So GitHub copilot doesn't have them? I don't really use that.

[-] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 74 points 6 days ago

It's saying Copilot was the first on the scene and had access to literally all of the training data anyone could possibly want, and is still being shown up by most other AI models. Their failure to capture the vibe coding space is a legendary fumble. At least that was my read.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] stickyprimer@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Being the first mover doesn’t guarantee shit and never has.

[-] cenzorrll@piefed.ca 28 points 6 days ago

I see this as proof of how bad LLMs actually are. You have an AI trained on essentially humanity's collective programming library. Languages of machines and computers. The result should be ungodly and near perfection. If there was any semblance of understanding in AI, it should be revealed in it's capability to produce code.

Although... I can definitely see Microsoft thinking that their code is the example of perfection and training copilot on that rather than github.

[-] terranoid@lemmy.cafe 40 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

should be ungodly and near perfection

Counterpoint: garbage in, garbage out

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] nightlily@leminal.space 16 points 5 days ago

If agentic LLMs are the prize, I’d be fine with losing.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 May 2026
972 points (98.5% liked)

Programmer Humor

31550 readers
916 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS