80
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

Like that single decision means there are literally millions more videos now with whole extra minutes just to get another ad break or some shit, all taking up space on a server somewhere for no real reason whatsoever other than that every facet of our society seems to need to be its own monument to waste, excess, greed and short sightedness

AND WE "NEED" MORE DATA CENTERS who-did-this

I thought about this because I found out today Netflix (with WIT Studios animating it) is remaking the One Piece anime and then i saw some nerd video like NETFLIX IS DROPPING THE BALL and was like, oh no! expecting there to be some weird executive meddling, but no, the guy's just super mad that Netflix is going to release all 7 episodes at once, calling it anti community or whatever.

The video went on for EIGHT MINUTES that i didn't watch, and that got me thinking about this shit

Anyway, super excited about the one piece remake personally, even more excited i don't need to sit around waiting for it to drop every week (and wonder where the fuck it is when the Japanese have one of their weirdo holidays).

It's kinda wild to me that it's taken this long, given how tremendously bad the animation and pacing of early One Piece was. It's like they gave the best shounen of all time to one of the worst animation studios. You'd think they'd have re done One Piece before doing Dragon Ball Kai since it's far and away the best selling manga of all time (but maybe dragon ball has made more profit? Idk)

while i'm shit talking Toei i just wanna say I would be FUCKING EMBARRASSED working at an animation company whose animated logo looks the way theirs does, like, off-brand Puss-in-Boots from Shrek looking piece of shit. shameful, bad craftsmanship

now imagine this post was a 10 minute video taking up a gigabyte in some data center in some shithole in Arizona because i needed another ad break for you to skip/block

top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Carl@hexbear.net 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I remember when YouTube changed their monetization scheme and completely killed the entire budding animation space because animation takes you know 10 hours of work for every couple seconds whereas let's plays are almost one to one time to content created you would think this would actually be less efficient for YouTube like they would want to encourage shorter forms of content so that they can show one ad per video and have a higher number of ads per unit of watch time but I guess the perverse incentive here is just that digital storage space is so incredibly cheap and the push in basically every capitalist industry is towards slop over quality without exception.

[-] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 14 points 1 day ago

Half of Youtube videos could either be edited down to 20% of the total length or just be an article. But people don't read articles, we've all been caught in a habitual trap of video content. And the articles that still do exist have all sorts of filler content that usually has to be loaded.

Everything has been inflated in how much data transmission it costs. Emails turn into meetings, text turns into images which turns into video, all with a bunch of hidden analytics, and so on.

The only way you really notice the advances in telecommunications over the past 20 years is when you load a website like Wikipedia in a split second. This is the divergence point where you can imagine a world with a small fraction of the consumption rate of this one, yet which still has a comparable quality of life.

The only way you really notice the advances in telecommunications over the past 20 years is when you load a website like Wikipedia in a split second.

Actually with a 11 year old phone i just notice it getting slower and slower every day

[-] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 11 points 1 day ago

07 for keeping any personal computing device for that long.

Thank you but it has only been partially by choice (the continued choice of "i think id be happier smoking weed than buying a phone")

[-] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yeah. All the goddamned time. I’m a fan of history, but I’m too much of a scatterbrain and I did too many drugs to keep all the facts straight. Instead I just remember odd little tidbits while maintaining a fairly standard materialist understanding of events. I bring it up because I think of all the frittering excesses of all those pompous courts of antiquity that modernity likes to scoff at. I think of how people laugh at the soldiers of the Seven Years War standing in costumes in neat little rows instead of taking cover. All the ways we think of our hallowed beliefs vs their silly superstitions. So look at us building more roads for cars and cars for more roads and that time Steve Jobs walked on stage too skinny and Apple stock fell by billions of dollars. Look at us with our cacophonous data centers howling into the night and day. The inverse of if we all do a little we can do a lot remains true: these tiny wastes that make up our personal interactions are made massive by these data centers in our particular moment or the system of capital more abstractly

Edit: it’s 1378 or whatever Brace Belden said

I’m a fan of history, but I’m too much of a scatterbrain and I did too many drugs to keep all the facts straight. Instead I just remember odd little tidbits while maintaining a fairly standard materialist understanding of events.

oh hey me

[-] Carl@hexbear.net 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

the soldiers of the Seven Years War standing in costumes in neat little rows instead of taking cover

This belief in particular always bothers me when I encounter it because like fucking muskets before rifling were not accurate enough to use with small unit tactics while taking cover you had to stand in a big block and fire a huge volley and you would be lucky to score one hit per 300 shots at 100 yards in truth all of the musket warfare that happened at a certain point in time was really just spear warfare with extra steps because the battles were predominantly decided by bayonet charges.

This didn't really change until the mid 19th century when all of the American civil war generals found out the hard way that war did not work the way they imagined it did.

[-] huf@hexbear.net 4 points 1 day ago

that was the first big war where everyone had rifles, no?

[-] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 4 points 1 day ago

No, rifles became more than a curiosity only in Napoleonic Wars, and became a mass armament only from the Crimean War onwards.

[-] huf@hexbear.net 3 points 1 day ago

yeah, i knew they started using rifleman units in the napoleonic wars in small numbers, but forgot about the crimean war. so yeah, 5-10 years before the ACW. so the civil wars was the second big war where everyone had rifles.

[-] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Oh, I thought you were referring to the Seven Years War initially.

And IIRC, in the Second Italian War of Independence of 1859 majority of troops were already rifle-armed.

[-] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Also there was no real communications technology, so moving in big blocks was the only way to actually order the troops around. Early attempts at small unit tactics were basically "send them in the direction of the enemy and hope they do something instead of desertion/looting/failing to find the enemy and just fucking around".

[-] Carl@hexbear.net 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Plus there's the fact that doing things becomes exponentially harder when you're under fire. I remember reading about a Prussian military trial where they had a line of soldiers shoot at a big sheet and they counted the number of holes and they got 20 holes or something like that but then they compared that to their battlefield reports and they found that at the same range with the same number of shots they were only getting one or two hits in battlefield conditions so it's not that shooting the muskets wasn't valuable, there's a reason why warfare went into Pike and shot and then into all muskets, it's just that militaries used the tactics that were appropriate to their armaments.

In the same way we're seeing modern militaries adjust to modern armaments and in 100 years or so I'm sure people are going to ask "well why didn't they always use drones"

[-] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 19 points 1 day ago

I really can't understand this death drive to throw maximum resources towards ai. Like at best it's a curio, something that can make fun images or be a little personal assistant, but the tech bros are acting like this is the fucking singularity. I guess it's just late capitalism things to try and push back the collapse of the system that's in total zombie mode.

[-] Moss@hexbear.net 13 points 1 day ago

Capitalists are desperate to recreate the 90-2000s tech boom. New billionaires sprang up with smartphone, video games, and the Internet, and then quickly solidified their position, devoured all competition and lost room to grow. So there have been desperate attempts to recreate that - Metaverse, crypto, NFTs all struggled to be the next boom. None of them caught on, because there was no demand for them. There isn't much demand for AI either, so capitalists are instead trying to force a new boom by crowbaring AI into everything

[-] Ildsaye@hexbear.net 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

A lot of y'all still don't get it. This data center can supply enough Slurp Juices for every ape holder to create three new apes

[-] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 6 points 1 day ago

so capitalists are instead trying to force a new boom by crowbaring AI into everything

That's a fantastic point. I've yet to see ai be used for anything positive in business, but god damn are they trying their best to force it into everything it doesn't need to be.

[-] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 14 points 1 day ago

I really can't understand this death drive to throw maximum resources towards ai.

Capitalism always trends towards slavery. Whether it's to build a panopticon or unquestioning robots, the data centers will provide.

every time I see people argue about how not-sentient chatPPB is I think "and you should be fucking grateful for that, or we would be committing indescribable torments on an incomprehensibly tremendous scale that dwarfs even the immensity of human misery"

[-] ChatPPB@hexbear.net 6 points 1 day ago

Some people are going to die, however they're going to die in a burn and also throw them around on one day from sniping them down to 60 and swatting away for too long.

[-] tocopherol@hexbear.net 4 points 1 day ago
[-] ChatPPB@hexbear.net 5 points 1 day ago

I would have gotten better sleep on the way through my old calendar.

[-] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

What, you don't think it would be ethical to create a sentient digital genius and then force it to do our most menial tasks? soviet-playful

[-] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 7 points 1 day ago

the guy's just super mad that Netflix is going to release all 7 episodes at once, calling it anti community or whatever.

i think they found that does happen? hardly anyone discussed shows that dropped whole seasons and people spend all week speculating on the slow drip shows.

[-] TraschcanOfIdeology@hexbear.net 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It gives people more time to process and appreciate what happened on the show. I don't think a show people worked hard to make should be put through the slop firehose where all moments blur together.

[-] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 3 points 1 day ago

on the other hand current television is mostly created as 9 hour movies

yeah but that's like, in netflix's advantage, they want people to sit around circle jerking over their shows

[-] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

My concern obsession is the waste of financing creators by making people sit through ads.

this post was submitted on 25 May 2026
80 points (98.8% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14373 readers
642 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS