371
submitted 1 year ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Highlights: Sen. Bernie Sanders said Sunday the United States should use aid to Israel as leverage to force its government to change its approach.

“If you want this money, you got to change your military strategy, Sanders (I-Vt.) said on CNN’s “State of the Union” when asked about a possible aid package for Israel to be considered by the Senate.

But the two senators who followed Sanders on that program were much more concerned about what Iran might be up to than what Israel is doing. Sanders condemned both Hamas (“an awful terrorist organization”) and the Israeli government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (whom he hopes will be voted out), calling for a two-state solution to the intractable crisis but not specifying how to create a path forward without Hamas, Netanyahu or war.

While decrying empty slogans on both sides of the conflict, Sanders also declined to endorse or condemn Rep. Rashida Tlaib’s (D-Mich.) criticism of President Joe Biden — she accused him of supporting “genocide” — even as he said attention needed to be paid to the rhetoric of Republicans on the subject, citing former President Donald Trump.

“If anyone thinks that Trump is going to be better than Biden on this issue or any other issue, for that matter, I think they are sorely mistaken,” he said.

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] PugJesus@kbin.social 81 points 1 year ago

Bernie is the leader we need, but don't deserve.

[-] mlg@lemmy.world 60 points 1 year ago

I'm still mad he's basically guaranteed to lose primaries, even when the DNC was publicly exposed for doing exactly that.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago

If countries gave their billions of dollars a year to humanitarian aid in Gaza instead of Israel's military this conflict would have ended decades ago...

People with nothing to lose, often act like people with nothing to lose.

So give them a basic quality of life they won't throw away.

[-] TechyDad@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

Not with Hamas in charge. A lot of aid has flowed to Gaza. The problem is that the Hamas leaders take it for themselves or use it for weapons to launch against Israel. Very little actually reaches the Palestinians. Hamas's leaders are billionaires who live in luxury in Qatar while the Palestinians suffer.

I do agree with you in theory, but we need to ensure that aid actually reaches the Palestinian people and isn't just used to make some billionaires in another country even richer.

[-] derphurr@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

but we need to ensure that aid ... isn't just used to make some billionaires in another country even richer

For one thing the paultry tens of millions of aid to Gaza/West Bank are audited and mostly goes towards roads and water.

For another, how many billionaires has US aid to Israel created? https://sgp.fas.org/crs/mideast/RL33222.pdf

To date, the United States has provided Israel $158 billion (current, or non-inflation-adjusted, dollars) in bilateral assistance and missile defense funding. At present, almost all U.S. bilateral aid to Israel is in the form of military assistance; from 1971 to 2007, Israel also received significant economic assistance.

In 2016, the U.S. and Israeli governments signed their third 10-year Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) on military aid, covering FY2019 to FY2028. Under the terms of the MOU, the United States pledged to provide—subject to congressional appropriation—$38 billion in military aid ($33 billion in Foreign Military Financing (FMF) grants plus $5 billion in missile defense appropriations) to Israel.

There are no audits of the monies Israel collects, and no penalty for even destroying the USS Liberty or stealing nuclear technology.

At the very least US needs to suspend the arms and money because of

Section 502B(a)(2) of the FAA (22 U.S.C. §2304(a)(2)) stipulates that, absent the exercise of certain presidential waivers due to extraordinary circumstances, “no security assistance may be provided to any country the government of which engages in a consistent pattern of gross violations of internationally recognized human rights.”

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Not with Hamas in charge

If Israel wasn't getting "self defense aid" they likely wouldn't have prevented Gaza from holding elections for the last couple decades...

In the current situation, Israel benefits greatly from Hamas "being in charge" of Gaza, even tho they don't really have any political power.

Like, it's hard to blame Hamas when Israel controls all the infrastructure and borders, and even controls police and what areas ambulances can pass thru.

Neither Hamas nor Israel's current government could exist without the other.

[-] kautau@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They mainly benefit from being a hotspot in a politically charged region where America has interest.

https://theintercept.com/2023/10/27/secret-military-base-israel-gaza-site-512/

Most of the defense spending we send over as “aid” lines defense contractors pockets and allows the US military to have a much larger presence there.

Defense contractors, and most of the politicians voting to support the “aid” that is sent don’t give a shit about Israel’s cause. They want a strong, profitable position in the Middle East, and putting on a front that they are supporting this “free, democratic” ally is a ploy to increase and expand that profit and funding wherever possible

[-] spaceghoti@lemmy.one 12 points 1 year ago

A lot of that could be fixed by making the aid material support like food, clothing, and medicine instead of money.

[-] blazera@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

Israel blocks out a lot of humanitarian aid.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Holy weasel words, Batman! REALLY working hard to make it sound like Bernie's a clueless hypocrite and Tlaib is an evil liar for her speaking truth to power and him not condemning her for it like all the lickspittles are 🤦

[-] FunkyMonk@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

A true mensch that one.

[-] dumdum666@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

but not specifying how to create a path forward without Hamas, Netanyahu or war.

Unfortunately this is exactly what is actually needed.

Everyone knows what the „international public“ does not want: Civilian deaths

No one seems to know how to actually do it.

[-] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Finally you say something positive and productive. I didn't think you had it in you, but I am pleasantly surprised to be proven wrong. Hopefully you can continue this trend into the future.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I appreciate this kind of honesty with the current situation. There are cultural and border differences abound in this world, and things will only get worse once resources become more scarce. Regardless of ideology, people need to work together to survive.

[-] GeorgeGrumpy@mastodon.social -2 points 1 year ago

@jeffw He took 800,000 bucks from arms manufacturers in 2020.

this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
371 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19097 readers
1942 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS