302
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Utah prosecutors have charged a former county clerk with three felonies and other counts for allegedly shredding and otherwise mishandling ballots from the 2020 and 2022 elections.

The alleged misdeeds involved ballots cast by about 5,000 voters in Juab County, a desert area of west-central Utah with about 12,000 residents.

Former Juab County Clerk/Auditor Alaina Lofgran is accused of allowing ballots to be shredded soon after the 2022 election in violation of a law requiring their preservation for at least 22 months. The law is for aiding recounts.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] hogunner@lemmy.world 121 points 1 year ago

Hold on, nobody tell me; I’m going to use my psychic gifts to ascertain the political leanings of this election interfering clerk.

Mmmmmmmmmmhmmmmmmm…it’s coming to me….I'm starting to see it more clearly….it starts with an…..”R”? Yes….its “Repopulate”? Wait, no it’s “Republican”. It says the clerk who manipulated votes is a Republican.

I’m sure you’re all as surprised as me at this crazy turn of events.

[-] Cranakis@lemmy.one 39 points 1 year ago

What? The party that constantly cheats at elections is cheating elections?

[-] Reality_Suit@lemmy.one 15 points 1 year ago

I'm convinced that the reason they say the election was stolen is because Republicans actually did rig the election, and trump still lost. So, if Republicans rigged the election and still lost, then they think Democrats must have done something to "steal" the election.

[-] Kaliax@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

It's almost always projection.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Do me, do me next.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 63 points 1 year ago

A Republican, Lofgran was Juab County clerk from 2015 to this year. She did not seek reelection in 2022.

The charges followed a 2022 lawsuit against Juab and several other Utah counties seeking 2020 election records. During the lawsuit, a state judge told Lofgran to preserve records from the 2020 election, according to the charging document.

The lawsuit was dismissed but appealed, resulting in a second court order to Lofgran to preserve the 2020 election results.

Soon after the 2022 election, a witness allegedly saw Lofgran put 2022 ballots in a “shred bin” in a large closet near the clerk's office. The ballots had to be taken out of the shred bin for a recount but a deputy clerk allegedly saw Lofgran put them back in later.

The election reports were done and “we don't need them anymore," Lofgran allegedly told the deputy clerk, who is unnamed in the charging document.

Probably the important parts there. Why there’s not a mandate to store those for multiple years…. I dunno. I have to keep tax filings the IRS doesn’t even need in the first pla for seven…

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

There is a mandate that you keep the ballots for 22 months, and there were two court orders to keep the ballots.

[-] argo_yamato@lemm.ee 42 points 1 year ago

That tracks since Republicans are the biggest threat to the USA

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 year ago
[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 year ago

Of representatives.

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

This is so surprising

this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
302 points (99.3% liked)

News

23265 readers
3955 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS