369
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 69 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It is simple really.

People stopped because the steamers made accessing media easier than piracy at a reasonable price.

Now that the reasonable price part is slipping away, people are re-assessing that decision.

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

One thing that we have learned is that piracy is not a pricing issue. It’s a service issue. The easiest way to stop piracy is not by putting anti-piracy technology to work. It’s by giving those people a service that’s better than what they’re receiving from the pirates.

Gabe Newell, 2011

I reduced, but never really stopped, pirating visual media. Entirely because even when Netflix was the only streaming service, there were still tons of shows and movies that weren't accessible digitally at all.

However I completely stopped pirating music over a decade ago, because everything I wanted was available on Spotify, and the service of discovery is well worth the price. As long as they don't get greedy and the service cost only rises with inflation, they'll have my approx $100 annually (2023 baseline) for the rest of my life.

Netflix, Disney, Paramount, etc can eat a bag of dicks though. They've each proven they're nothing but greedy parasites, and the only way I'd stop pirating is with a single subscription that hosts everything for a reasonable price... There's a higher probability that hell freezes over, so instead I'll spend roughly $100 a month in computing hardware, internet services, and time, to pirate 90% of my content.

[-] cheezoid2@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago

Steamers also paved the road to Cleveland

[-] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Cheers. That is the best spelling correction I have ever read.

I am leaving it as is.

[-] RagnarokOnline@reddthat.com 7 points 1 year ago

Full steam ahead!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SoylentBlake@lemm.ee 44 points 1 year ago

More competition... =Prices increase.

This is not the outcome I was told would happen.

Wait, what else was I told that never came correct.?

Student loans Housing Pay raises Protect and serve Self driving cars Pot/Gateway Equal opportunity Meritocracy

... I'm beginning to think all of society, in it's entirety, is just one big grift.

[-] Nonameuser678@aussie.zone 20 points 1 year ago

No matter what they say capitalists do not actually like, or benefit, from competition.

[-] Cassus@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

They actively kill competition for a reason.

[-] holygon@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago

I mean, what is competition? The entire point of a competition is that someone wins, and someone loses. When the entire structure is a competition, then if enough time passes most participants will have lost, and only one will stand victorious. The concept of free market competition will always end in monopoly, and every anti-trust mechanism is just a way to slow this down, not an actual solution. Capitalism will never create a solution to this either, as monopoly is the logical goal of capitalism. When monopoly exists, the capitalists have the most power. Of course capitalism will benefit the capitalists. It would be weird if it didn't.

[-] reev@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago

It's not competition if everyone has exclusivity contracts on all the content. Take Spotify vs Netflix for example. Spotify will have mostly the same base content as Apple Music, Deezer, what have you. With Netflix... You don't get any Disney movies, no game of thrones, you have to buy all of the services to get access to even just the content you want.

I've never felt I was missing out on anything with Spotify, as I likely wouldn't with YouTube music either. Maybe some have less but it's at least a very comparable catalogue across the board.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] alienanimals@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

More competition == price increase

Less competition == price increase

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

You're forgetting the effect demand has on prices. Studios all pulled their content from Netflix and said "fuck you, pay us". People paid, so here we are. Had people said "No, fuck you! Put the content back on Netflix" then we'd still have $15 for everything on one platform. There was enough demand for companies to sell their products. It's not competition when each service has different offerings.

[-] Mkengine@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

Is it really competition when for example Disney has a monopoly on Disney Streaming Content?

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Da_Boom@iusearchlinux.fyi 3 points 1 year ago

That possibly would've worked if the platforms all had an agreement to share the same content and not monopolize exclusives. If that were the case you'd choose the one with the best price and the best features.0

[-] DeltaTangoLima@reddrefuge.com 33 points 1 year ago

Just gonna re-post my own comment from another thread in this community, relating to a similar article, because it's just as applicable here:

This is honestly hilarious to me. The streaming companies actually had it right to begin with. They delivered on-demand content at a much lower cost than DVD distribution, without having to negotiate with cable companies to deliver it. They had a working system that delivered value for money, and kept the profits in their own pockets.

Then they shit the bed. Classic case of killing the goose that laid the golden eggs. Greedy dickheads.

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't think that's what happened. Studios fought streaming tooth and nail. But they were willing to license their videos to Netflix because they were a DVD distributor. Then Netflix was really savvy and pioneered streaming, making a killing doing it. Those same anti-progress, greedy fuck studios who fought against streaming saw how much money Netflix was making with their content and spun up their own half-assed streaming services, then pulled their licensing from Netflix. Netflix didn't kill itself, the same greedy people who tried to kill the vcr, fought streaming, and sued Napster users, killed it.

[-] DeltaTangoLima@reddrefuge.com 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Nah - Netflix, and all the others, have absolutely shit the bed on this one.

I was happily paying for 5 or 6 streaming services a month. Then they got greedy, started price gouging, and reducing the quality and/or range of content. Netflix even wanted to charge me for password sharing, because my stepkids used our account at their dad's house.

They all fucked themselves over.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Vlhacs@reddthat.com 8 points 1 year ago

I'm no economist, but it's interesting how a free market and more competition doesn't result in a better product for consumers. Just each company going "oh, the other guy raised their prices, let's do the same or we'll fall behind"

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's crazy how consumers just keep eating the higher prices too, instead of rebelling by cutting their spending. I've been wondering if people are just charging everything and we're going to hit a major recession when everyone runs out of credit. I sure hope not! I've already gone through too many "once in a lifetime" economic events.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

The idea is supposed to be that these things wax and wane. And they mostly do.

We started stealing music with Napster -> the market eventually started offering affordable alternatives

We started stealing movies with The Pirate Bay -> studios finally came onboard with streaming

We stole games -> market reacted with serviced like Steam that make it too cheap and easy to bother pirating

And now that streaming greed seems to be biting them in the ass, we're due for another market correction.

We'll see, but I never stopped pirating. Only thing I pay for is Spotify because it's too damned convenient to get the music I want, anywhere I want, for $10/mo. Spotify: Test me with higher prices or stop me from making local downloads and I'll drop back to stealing that shit too.

[-] LoamImprovement@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

Be nice to the goose.

  • Martin O'Donnell
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Ringmasterincestuous@aussie.zone 25 points 1 year ago

🏴‍☠️

Was 20 years between sails. 56kb dialup that could hardly get an album down in a couple of days to self hosting a server that I don’t even consume the content of.

Seed. That. Shit.

[-] gnuplusmatt@reddthat.com 25 points 1 year ago

some of the big studios are starting to not do discs releases here in Australia as well. If I want an archive copy of a movie (for the months I dont feel like shelling out for streaming access), I can't even fall back to disc. The high seas is already the only place to get some content, when its not on disc and no one has purchased the digital rights

[-] bandario@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 year ago

That is the bed they made and now the studios must lay in it.

I don't care if they start distributing microSD cards, there MUST be a physical distribution format that is not linked to an online subscription.

[-] gnuplusmatt@reddthat.com 4 points 1 year ago

I've always been surprised its remained optical media for so long. I'd have bought a USB drive with a season of television on it. No doubt they'd fuck it up with another DRM scheme.

I'm resigned to the fact that if there is no offline distribution in the not too distant future, I will still build a library of the media I want from other sources.

[-] bandario@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Pretty soon it will ONLY be the pirates that have access to a lot of this content. You should think of it is a global community service.

[-] Mini_Moonpie@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 year ago

For me, it's the decision fatigue. The content is so fragmented across so many services and it's constantly getting worse. The rising costs adds to the fatigue because the fragmentation is less manageable now with all the services raising prices and cracking down on password sharing. I just feel like I have to think about it too much now.

[-] tobbue@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago

I mean, there literally are complex websites created just to help people find and filter for streaming services that serve a movie or a series under what conditions or prices and the results are so fragmented and unsatisfying. Hell, so often a simple classic movie is on none of the streaming services or just on one on which you even then have to pay even if you are paying for a subscription (looking at you, Prime). So what the f, how should I happily decide for a subscription if the next day I have to yet pay for another one just because a effin movie is on another platform? Streaming has become a damn chore.

[-] Damage@feddit.it 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Jellyfin best streaming platform

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] codenul@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 year ago

Some people never left the seas

[-] M500@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago

Streaming services are hard to navigate. There needs to just be one place to stream everything from like music. Then I’ll never sail the seas again,

[-] The_v@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Ironically the unofficial streaming sites basically have that covered now. Pretty much anything you want on release day from the major streaming companies.

[-] Salvo@aussie.zone 4 points 1 year ago

All The Web is getting too hard to navigate. If it isn’t the layers of layers of ads and trackers making it impossible to read content, or the obfuscation of permalinks, or AI plagiarism of original content, it is the 7 pages of Sponsored Links in search engines, meaning that your eyeballs are going to the highest bidder.

Meanwhile algorithmic curated lists are force-fed to consumers for the sole purpose of manipulating their political beliefs and buying habits, railroading them into making life decisions for the benefit of others.

[-] M500@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Just yesterday, I looked for a tool to encrypt files in Dropbox.

I couldn’t remember the name, so I searched “encrypt files in drop box.”

Every single link on the first page was to the official site. I had to guess at the name of the software to find its site.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Omegamint@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago

The only problem is that I can’t convince my friends/roommates to embrace the media center piracy box. Literally the smallest level of extra work is too much. I’m not sure how to make it easier

load more comments (6 replies)

Yeah if the mainstream media could shut up about piracy that would be great.

This is how takedowns happen

[-] cmysmiaczxotoy@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

I have always been a sailor but did pay for Netflix for 6-7 years mainly to share the account with others. When content evaporated I dropped it. I paid HBO streaming to support Game of Thrones and then dropped it too. I always watched WEB-DL even when paying for a service because of quality

Never left baby 🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️!

[-] Steve@startrek.website 4 points 1 year ago
[-] bazingabrain@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago
[-] Melina@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago

Yo ho ho and a bottle of cum

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Digital piracy is the act of illegally copying or distributing copyrighted material, such as music, TV shows or movies, via the internet.

Associate Professor at the RMIT University School of Media and Communication Ramon Lobato said piracy levels were related to a number of different factors, including disposable income, willingness to pay, users' digital skills, and the availability and convenience of both legal and pirate services.

It is important to note data on piracy cannot be drawn as entirely conclusive as it relies on self-reporting and information availability is limited due to its criminal nature.

Dr Lobato said delayed releasing of movies and TV shows has historically been a driver of piracy in Australia, but the studios and distributors have worked hard to reduce this in recent years.

The Attorney-General 2022 Consumer Survey on Online Copyright Infringement, which has the latest official Australian data, showed an increase in piracy across the music, movies, TV programs, video games and live sport compared to the year prior.

The most popular form of unlawful consumption was paying a small fee to access one or many subscription services through a shared or unknown account with 16 per cent of respondents using this method.


The original article contains 1,117 words, the summary contains 191 words. Saved 83%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2023
369 points (99.7% liked)

Australia

3620 readers
156 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS