106
Kicking the can down the road once again.
I will keep saying it- they could fund the government for the next 100 years if they wanted to.
They could separate their budget from legislation. Like just about every other country.
Do they even pass legislation outside of budget omnibusses anymore?
Yes, there's plenty of stuff that flies through with bipartisan support. It's almost universally stuff that benefits the rich at the expense of the working class, so (a) that's why both parties support it and (b) that's why you don't hear much about it from the media.
I agree that kicking the can down the road isn't going to help anything at this juncture, but it isn't a good idea to fund the government for the next 100 years. The world changes drastically pretty much every year at this point, and funding needs to change with it. We just need actual adults as representatives so it doesn't take the entire legislative session to do the basic upkeep of our nation.
https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI-S8-C12-2/ALDE_00001074/
Article 1, Section 8, Clause 12 --
The government cannot find the military for a term longer than 2 years. While most other functions aren't mentioned, Congress would still have to pass a funding bill every 2 years anyway.
If everyone else could work like congress:
Plumber - yup, just keep using that bucket, I'll come back to snake it in a few months. By the way I'm charging you for my time off.
Surgeon - I think the cancer will hold for a while, we'll get to it sometime next year.
Teacher - Ok, keep practicing 2x2, we'll cover 3s when I damn well feel like it.
Taxi/Uber driver - I'm gonna need to stop at my inlaws for Thanksgiving dinner, you're cool if we keep the meter running, right?
DMV - No change
Police - A slight improvement
At least they got the military covered. What a relief.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
President Joe Biden on Thursday signed the stopgap spending bill into law, averting a shutdown for now and setting up a contentious fight over funding in the new year.
The measure, which passed both chambers with bipartisan support in a major victory for House Speaker Mike Johnson, is an unusual two-step plan that sets up two new shutdown deadlines in January and February.
The plan is not a full-year spending bill and only extends funding until January 19 for priorities including military construction, veterans’ affairs, transportation, housing and the Energy Department.
Democrats have once again conceded aid for Ukraine after additional military assistance wasn’t included in the stopgap bill that passed in September.
Johnson’s plan allows Congress to avoid having to pass a major spending bill before the winter holidays, but the lack of support from members of his own party will set up a leadership test for the recently elected speaker.
His predecessor, Rep. Kevin McCarthy, was ousted after putting the previous stopgap bill on the House floor at the end of September, though the move averted a shutdown.
The original article contains 316 words, the summary contains 175 words. Saved 45%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
106 points (99.1% liked)
politics
19107 readers
1994 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS