Okay so you fired someone, then decided later to bring them back. This means whatever guideline you use to fire people is floppy or petulant, you caved to public backlash, or the firing guidelines are clear but the information you took grave actions upon was bad (was unreliable and/or unverified).

Anyway, none of those things are good markers of leadership.

Edit: Forgot another reason for recanting a firing: your boss told you that you don’t have the authority. Nothing takes away your leadership teeth like that…

Maybe they just asked chatGPT who to hire.

That’s hilarious

So, folks, who can take over as CEO?

Well theres... (Looks at list of top people who immediately quit after the announcement) ... Aah shit.

This is how you say “wait, shit, we fucked up” in Board of Directors.

Be interesting to see how many of them still have seats by Christmas.

Makes me remember how greeks made a rule to give capital punishment only after sleeping over the decision.

lol. clown show

Well the two people who quit in solidarity must be feeling pretty cool right about now.

They got a look at how many were quitting on Monday and realized their whole company was screwed. This is how Sam will wipe out the board of directors, possibly with ownership percentage?

We need Armando Ianucci (The Thick of it, In the Loop, The Death of Stalin) to get the film rights to this when the dust settles. Holy shit what an opportunity to skewer high tech idiots and business idiocy in general.

This is the best summary I could come up with:

The OpenAI board is in discussions with Sam Altman to return to CEO, according to multiple people familiar with the matter.

One of them said Altman, who was suddenly fired by the board on Friday, is “ambivalent” about coming back and would want significant governance changes.

Developing...

The original article contains 47 words, the summary contains 47 words. Saved 0%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

Hahahahahahahahahaha

That was quick