734
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Lumidaub@feddit.de 154 points 1 year ago

I love how obsessed some Americans are with their founding fathers, it's adorably weird. I've never ever based any of my decisions or opinions on what our first chancellor did or didn't do and I don't see fucking why.

[-] gothicdecadence@lemmy.world 85 points 1 year ago

It would be adorable if it wasn't dangerous :/ they use the founding fathers and constitution in the same way they use Jesus and the Bible - as a reason to hurt others and stop progress

[-] 1chemistdown@kbin.social 45 points 1 year ago

And it’s funny in the wtf way because the founding fathers were against religion being involved in the governing of the nation. They codified that crap! And yet, these idiots keep trying to claim it’s a Christian nation and we need god back in everything.

[-] Lumidaub@feddit.de 18 points 1 year ago

You're of course correct and I can only be playful about it because of my privileged position of being outside the US. I get that it fucking sucks from the inside.

[-] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

You have no idea, hombre. They’ve slow boiled us like crabs to the point that 50% of the population is bragging that they have a hot tub while not realizing that they’re already cooked.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] SlimeKnight@lemm.ee 36 points 1 year ago

The way it was explained to me, it's because of a lack of history.

Being a new country, they had effectively no history or culture, unlike the rest of the world. It lead to a desire to develop it's own identity which lead to elevating the founding fathers to a myth like status to match those of other countries.

It made sense to me, since there are myths involving demigods in different part of the world.

[-] gmtom@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Yeah its the same way other post-revolutionary countries idolise their revolutionary leaders, like how the soviets idolised Lenin or Trotsky.

[-] Burp@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

They were pretty cool enlightenment thinkers who created the first constitutional republic and were able to muscle out the British Empire. It’s pretty remarkable.

[-] nan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 1 year ago

What they did is remarkable, but they are often treated more like oracles and the constitution like some perfect golden tablets someone dug up in their yard (despite needing significant changes right after it was ratified).

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

Lots of US people will explain to you that the constitution and its amendments are immutable. And when you ask them to repeat that slowly, they'll just say it louder because you're the slow one.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Lumidaub@feddit.de 10 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I know. Now if anyone used their actual intellectual accomplishments as arguments instead of the simple fact that they existed, that might be interesting.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

It's an important part of history. The fact that the ideology of some guys that founded our nation a few years back would be viewed as far left extremists nowadays is astonishing. These guys literally left a country and made their own country with radical stuff like freedom of speech, allowing people to come through the borders if they feel unsafe, democracy for the people and by the people and not corporate dirtbags fucking us every chance they get. Not to mention our freedoms keeping on shrinking little by little from the Patriot Act and more legislation to monitor our communications "foR tHe ChiLdRen".

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

radical stuff like freedom of speech

...for white men.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Nawor3565@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 1 year ago

Just remember: these people's vote counts just as much as anyone else's.

[-] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 49 points 1 year ago

these people's vote counts just as much as anyone else's.

Not true for Americans. How much your vote counts is based on which state you live in due to the Electoral College

[-] MostlyBirds@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

Yup. In most cases, these people's votes count more than the rest of ours.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And also the amount of money you can funnel through lobbyists.

[-] SomeoneElse@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

The first vote on this post was a downvote… they’re everywhere!

[-] Glide@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

Are you sure about that? These opinions are overwhelmingly represented in low-population counties, so their vote counts way more than most peoples.

Don't you know? Democracy is about making sure all land is equally represented, not all citizens.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BitOneZero@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

Back then, they seemed to just wear a lot more clothes. It's such an odd stance to think you can't use an umbrella or clothing to block out the sun. I can understand being skeptical about the side-effects of sunscreen being slathered on your body and absorbed... but it's pretty common to see depiction of parasols being used in older times.

[-] SomeoneElse@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I have lupus and my skin has become really sensitive to the sun as I’ve got older. I think about getting a parasol fairly regularly but I don’t have the confidence or style to pull it off unfortunately!

[-] boeman@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago
[-] Mythril@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

No need to worry about pulling off the style because no one can wear these with style anyways

[-] SomeoneElse@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

You can see the sadness in that guys eyes…

[-] solstice@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I just visited DC a few weeks ago and it was insanely hot and bright. I always carry an umbrella in my day bag so I used it for shade walking around. Even though it looked dorky and wasn't at all stylish I got a ton of compliments and nods of approval. Just do it, nobody will judge, everyone will think you're a genius.

[-] Kinyutaka@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Screw what everyone else thinks and rock that parasol.

[-] Return_of_the_Fly@lemm.ee 19 points 1 year ago

People have been using all kinds of stuff for sun screen for centuries. Ancient Greeks used olive oil, for example.

[-] yata@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 year ago

And of course clothing. There is a reason that beduins dress like they do, or why stetson type hats became popular in the West.

[-] Decoy321@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago
[-] jordanlund@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

I had no idea they even knew what cancer was back then... fascinating!

[-] SomeoneElse@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Cancer was first described in 3000BC! Here you go.

[-] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Just because people lacked advanced analysis techniques, it doesn’t mean they weren’t observant. There are a huge number of things about the world that ancient people were very tuned into, they just didn’t have the tools to learn more than their senses could tell them.

Just looking at the stars at night and comprehending how long and tedious it must be to track them to the point that you can determine the time of the year or your position on the ocean is a small taste of understanding how much our ancestors noticed about the world.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Even if George Washington didn't have skin cancer, what does that prove?

[-] CobaltLion@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I don't think a sample size of one really proves anything.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] theragu40@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Come on, we already have anti vaxxers, is there some kind of underground anti sunscreen movement now too? And even if George Washington didn't have skin cancer... What evidence is one dude's lack of cancer to prove that a modern protective product doesn't work? We have no idea how much time he spent in the sun, we don't know if he always wore long sleeves, etc.

Obviously we know he did have cancer, but I just can't get over how many levels of flaw this argument contains in so few words.

[-] ratboy@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

There is, an old friend of mine posted a ridiculous video about it on instagram....sure, there MAY be side effects to using sunscreen (not sunblock) that have turned up inconclusive in studies, but it has been proven that sunscreen and sunblock are VERY effective against skin cancer.

It's just like the "covid vaccines can have an extremely small possility of side effects so I'd rather get long covid and DIE!!"

[-] theragu40@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Jesus christ.

You know I don't honestly love wearing sunscreen. It's greasy, it sucks.

But you know what I like less? Being sunburned! Being sunburned is legitimately terrible!

You know what I like less than being sunburned? Fucking CANCER.

Wearing sunscreen is such a laughably low effort alternative to these horrible things that happen otherwise.

People are so goddamned stupid it boggles the mind.

[-] raynorsadjutant@reddthat.com 5 points 1 year ago

But it is simple. Also, you throw it at this crowd and they come back with evidence. Well, you throw it at another crowd and they might say: Oh right, they’ve got a good point there. Few words, simple message, inner logic = will work on a lot of people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] cpo@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Hey, science is just an opinion, right?

🤦‍♂️

[-] TIEPilot@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

He was 6' 8" and weighed a fucking ton...

https://youtu.be/sbRom1Rz8OA

And invented cocaine...

[-] Default_Defect@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago

I heard that motherfucker had like 30 god damn dicks.

[-] TIEPilot@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Even on his feet!

12 stories tall made of radiation.

[-] MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And his wooden teeth story was cover for the fact his fake teeth were made up of the teeth of his slaves. We don't know if the slaves had died before having his or her teeth removed for the first President of the United States.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Phoebe@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago

When i was younger a former friend of mine told me that bs. I have light skin (right translation?) So it's a dangerous "advise". I never believed it, but the discusion were... exhausting.

[-] SomeoneElse@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Light-skinned is the right translation. But you mean “advice”. Advice is a noun - it is the information. Advise is a verb - to advise someone means to tell them something. I’m advising you by giving you this advice. That not the best example but hopefully it makes sense! And one last thing, it’s discussions not discussion. But that’s really nitpicking. Plenty of native English speakers make those mistakes and what you wrote was understandable. I wish I was remotely as good at Spanish as you are English!

[-] Phoebe@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago

Thank you for your advice! I turned on two languages im autocorrect, but my smart phone still is getting confused. Cause sometimes i pick Diskussionen instead of discussions or it simply doesn't get the error itself. When i write fast that always makes me anxios

But thank you. That's motivating me!☺️

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2023
734 points (98.2% liked)

Confidently Incorrect

3958 readers
1 users here now

When people are way too smug about their wrong answer.

Posting guidelines.

All posts in this community have come from elsewhere, it is not original content, the poster in this community is not OP. The person who posts in this community isn’t necessarily endorsing whatever the post is talking about and they are not looking to argue with you about the content in the post.

You are welcome to discuss and debate any topic but arguments are not welcome here. I consider debate/discussions to be civil; people with different opinions participating in respectful conversations. It becomes an argument as soon as someone becomes aggressive, nasty, insulting or just plain unpleasant. Report argumentative comments, then ignore them.

There is currently no rule about how recent a post needs to be because the community is about the comeback part, not the topic.

Rules:

• Be civil and remember the human.

• No trolling, insults or name calling. Swearing in general is fine, but not to insult someone.

• No bigotry of any kind, including homophobia, transphobia, sexism and racism.

• You are welcome to discuss and debate any topic but arguments are not welcome here. I consider debate/discussions to be civil; people with different opinions participating in respectful conversations. It becomes an argument as soon as someone becomes aggressive, nasty, insulting or just plain unpleasant. Report argumentative comments, then ignore them.

• Try not to get too political. A lot of these posts will involve politics, but this isn’t the place for political arguments.

• Participate in good faith - don’t be aggressive and don’t argue for arguements sake.

• Mark NSFW posts if they contain nudity.

• Satire is allowed but please start the post title with [satire] so other users can filter it out if they’d like.

Please report comments that break site or community rules to the mods. If you break the rules you’ll receive one warning before being banned from this community.

This community follows the rules of the lemmy.world instance and the lemmy.org code of conduct. I’ve summarised them here:

  1. Be civil, remember the human.
  2. No insulting or harassing other members. That includes name calling.
  3. Respect differences of opinion. Civil discussion/debate is fine, arguing is not. Criticise ideas, not people.
  4. Keep unrequested/unstructured critique to a minimum.
  5. Remember we have all chosen to be here voluntarily. Respect the spent time and effort people have spent creating posts in order to share something they find amusing with you.
  6. Swearing in general is fine, swearing to insult another commenter isn’t.
  7. No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, xenophobia or any other type of bigotry.
  8. No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS