415
submitted 11 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

YouTube warns it might make your viewing experience worse if you don't turn off your ad-blocker::YouTube has been cracking down on people using ad blockers. Now, a spokesperson says that using ad blockers could lead to "suboptimal viewing."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Anorack@lemmy.world 236 points 11 months ago

Worse than using YouTube without an ad blocker?

[-] DeathWearsANecktie@lemm.ee 107 points 11 months ago

That's the funny thing about this threat. It implies that using YouTube the regular way is "optimal" viewing. It's fucking shit without adblock.

[-] NightOwl@lemmy.one 36 points 11 months ago

Even without ads it's shit without sponsorblock for me. Not even for the sponsor spots, but the absolutely annoying copy paste of please like, subscribe, hit the notification icon, blah blah blah blah blah.

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

That's shit, but it's still usable as I can shortcut my way around it. The ads are hot liquid swamp ass that make it unusable. I see ad, I circumvent or close tab.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rob299@bookwormstory.social 14 points 11 months ago

It's optimal to them. You just don't understand Youtube's perspective of it yet. And then it's unoptimal for them when you watch with the adblocker.

[-] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 11 points 11 months ago

How to quit YT in a week?

  1. disable adblocking
  2. Suffer watching ads
  3. Get bored, because you no longer feel like watching adTube
  4. Switch to something else
[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 51 points 11 months ago

There is absolutely zero possibility that they can find a way to make my experience on YouTube worse than my experience on YouTube without uBlock.

[-] rob299@bookwormstory.social 7 points 11 months ago

That's a way to look at, but i'l personally still be using Peertube. instead of 3rd party YouTube apps.

[-] xe3@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Some of those alternative “YouTube” apps are not limited to YouTube as a backend/source of content. I don’t recall if it’s freetube, new pipe or both that allow using Peertube and YouTube from the same app, which helps bridge the gap in content / ease the transition from an end user perspective.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

The fact that my children know the Liberty Mutual jingle from watching YouTube at school says no.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] archonet@lemy.lol 124 points 11 months ago

which is a hilarious threat because the #1 way to make my viewing experience worse would be turning off my ad blocker, lmao

[-] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 26 points 11 months ago

"if you don't voluntarily make your experience 10x worse, we will make it 2x worse"

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dezmd@lemmy.world 71 points 11 months ago

Ive had my ad blocker turned off for a week on Youtube. Theres a preroll ad on every video and a shitload of ad break mid video and at the last 3 seconds of a video.

Its the worst viewing experience I can imagine. I cut out Twitch and even stopped all my subs when they went mandatory ad viewing. Im full on ready for third party options in the same spirit as Lemmy.

[-] TragicNotCute@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago

I also think they are fucking with the sound levels in the same way TV did prior to the FTC ruling. The commercials are awfully loud compared to the content.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Brian437@lemmy.world 46 points 11 months ago

I think my viewing experience will be even worse if I turn off my ad blocker.

[-] r3df0x@7.62x54r.ru 10 points 11 months ago

Youtube advertising is absolute trash. It's already bad enough to sit through ads when you don't even know if you want to watch the video. Their ads consist of fake Joe Rogans with tts voices advertising scams.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] nick@midwest.social 37 points 11 months ago

Get fucked, YouTube.

[-] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 36 points 11 months ago

Loving Freetube, Newpipe, and Grayjay more and more every day!

[-] rob299@bookwormstory.social 18 points 11 months ago

in the short term they work, but YouTube can cut those 3rd party apps access at any time for any reason. Use Peertube for the better long term.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Tried to dive into Piped recently, but nothing would load.

I'm only surface-level competent with computers though, so I probably fucked something up... since you've poked around multiple options, which one(s) do you recommend as the most idiot proof?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] mvirts@lemmy.world 26 points 11 months ago

YouTube is just messing around. They could encode ads randomly on videos if they wanted to, like podcasts.

[-] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 27 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

There's already a sponsor blocker extension that skips when a sponsor is even mentioned, it would be trivial to add other embedded ads to it.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 8 points 11 months ago

cheaper to just have the interns code buggy Javascript then to reencode millions of videos.

[-] MiltownClowns@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

This. I don't exactly know how YouTube's architecture works, but from running my own mediaserver i woild guess They don't live transcode because that takes clock cycles on a graphics card or a CPU. They transcode a couple of different bitrate files to serve up and then just serve up direct stream file transfers, thus saving electricity and clock cycles. In order to actively embed an ad in a YouTube video it would have to be done semi-permanently, Decreasing the value of live serve ads.

[-] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 11 months ago

You're correct that they're not doing live transcoding when a video is played. That's way too expensive in every regard. There are still ways to embed ads dynamically into the video without requiring live transcoding. They likely have 5-10 qualities they encode to, and segment the video into 10s segments, so a 5 minute video would be cut into 30 segments, and then each of those files encoded to multiple qualities upon upload.

That way when playing, if your Internet gets slow, the player can seamlessly downgrade to another quality. These small files concatenated together appear like one long video. Adding some ads served from the same servers as the content could be done dynamically for each request and be difficult to block without impacting the video content delivery, since you can't have uBlock Origin block the domain hosting the content.

Realistically, they probably don't do this approach because you don't know if the ad was loaded because of buffering, but never viewed, so the ad network gets less metrics and therefore the ads are less valuable. Also, I would bet the content upload and distribution team are completely separate from the ad team, so that cross collaboration is more difficult to implement.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Srootus@sh.itjust.works 24 points 11 months ago
[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 24 points 11 months ago

How could it be worse than with ads?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] NGC2346@sh.itjust.works 23 points 11 months ago

How about you suck my balls accordingly, google?

[-] Shotgun_Alice@lemmy.world 23 points 11 months ago

Oh no, so how will I be able to tell a difference?

[-] LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 22 points 11 months ago

Can’t make it worse of you don’t use it.

[-] seeCseas@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

Youtube is past the growth phase, at this point it's about minimising cost and maximising revenue.

If you regularly use it with adblock but decide to stop using it because of this, then youtube would have succeeded. You weren't making them money and were costing them bandwidth, so good riddance.

If you really want to stick it to them, turn on adblock, find some long videos and play them on mute in the background at 4K/1080p60 resolution. Cost them even more bandwidth.

Even better, start randomly disliking videos or making nonsensical comments (not hateful or toxic ones, just comments that don't make sense). Enshittify it further.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 20 points 11 months ago

It's official, Youtube now has people employed as product worseners.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 19 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Google: “Fine, I’ll turn off your adblocker myself!” *rolling out Manifest v3*

[-] InEnduringGrowStrong@sh.itjust.works 19 points 11 months ago

I can also just back out and just not watch said videos...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] hyper@lemmy.zip 17 points 11 months ago

Way to kill your platform. Sadly there’s no big competition

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 17 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Gauna@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Turning off your ad-blocker is like running in jail, naked. So no thanks, YT.

Both Firefox + uBlock Origin saved me countless times from malicious ads since years. You should do it too.

[-] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 15 points 11 months ago

If for some reason you can't use a full-on ad blocker, "SponsorBlock for Youtube" is another Firefox extension you can install. It doesn't block ads per se, but it will auto-skip segments of a video that have been reported as ad content. Kind of a grassroots thing, like reporting cops on Waze.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] CrowAirbrush@lemm.ee 11 points 11 months ago

Keep it up, dumbasses.

Catch the hint...the harder you try the harder we do. There's no trying from our end.

[-] Furbag@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

YouTube losing the war on AdBlockers, lol.

[-] Rustmilian@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago
[-] grue@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

When the video creators you watch move to them.

[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 7 points 11 months ago

Kind of shocked it took this long.

It always cost more more but the games that used clever traps were a lot more effective than just drm. Because warez groups can easily check if the game launches. Not if every enemy after mission four has infinite health and pinpoint accuracy.

Just curious if this maps to "shit, Google knows Twitter exists and figured out what we are doing" or "YouTube servers are broken"

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
415 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

59038 readers
3190 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS