64
submitted 1 year ago by sik0fewl@kbin.social to c/canada@lemmy.ca

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith confirmed the her plan to invoke the Sovereignty Act on Your Province Your Premier on Saturday.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

Alberta’s got to get their shit today and elect a serious person next time.

[-] AnotherDirtyAnglo@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 year ago

Danielle Smith: Letting 5 year olds decide what's for dinner and when to go to bed.

[-] canis_majoris@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 year ago

Going well passed Texas of the North to Florida of the North.

[-] yardy_sardley@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 year ago

Smith said the province tried to work collaboratively with the federal government to make the province’s electricity grid net zero by 2050

"The feds didn't capitulate to our demands so we're taking the province of Alberta hostage"

“We will not put our operators at risk of going to jail if they do not achieve the unachievable,”

It's unachievable, Danielle, because your ignorant ass put a moratorium on renewable energy projects. And why does she feel the need to feign sympathy for the dinosaurs at the top whose refusal to act is the reason we're here in the first place? If they can't conduct business in accordance with the law, they can gtfo of the way and make room for those who can.

"...he's a maverick. He doesn’t seem to care about the law, doesn’t care about the Constitution. I do."

Says the person who personally donated $60k to a seditious organization.

As far as I'm concerned, these excuses are nothing but selfish and asinine. They only serve to vindicate and encourage the bad behaviour of those who ought to be taking responsibility. How exactly "It's too expensive" is a serious take when we all just spent 4 consecutive months living inside a cloud of wildfire smoke is beyond me. Fuck off.

[-] CanadaPlus@futurology.today 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Please drop the hammer on us when she does. This shit will never end otherwise.

[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 year ago

Oh, Alberta. This isn't a good look, but neither is anything else you do. 🤭

[-] pbjamm@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

Pretty soon they will be blaming clean energy for the sorry state of the Oilers season.

[-] JustADrone@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

TRUDEAU WANTS TO RENAME OUR TEAM "THE SOLARS" DO THE SOVRINTY ACT THING!!!!

[-] ZC3rr0r@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 year ago

Alberta is about to create a federal constitutional challenge, and find out that they are, despite the conservatives' collective pipe dream, part of Canada.

I can already hear the chorus of "this is a gross overreach of federal power" and "Trudeau is a dictator" whines coming from the usual culprits. And the base gets riled up even further...

It's starting to become ever more tempting to, at some point, actually give them that freedom they so desperately want and defederate Alberta from Canada. I give them about as long as California was actually independent for before they come begging to be let back in, after they come to the realization that they are a land-locked nation that depends on its neighbors and existing trade relationships and agreements to sell any of their precious oil to the world.

Be careful what you wish for wild roses, you just might get it.

[-] JustADrone@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

separation would require a referendum, which would have 0% chance of passing. nobody wants this, beside some whackos. this is all posturing by the UCP, both to their base and to the federal government.

[-] ZC3rr0r@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

I know seperation is not popular enough to actually make it happen, but what I don;t understand is why this point gets brought up so much by the UCP if it isn't popular enough to actually happen. If a politician/party is constantly harping about something I don't actually support, why would I vote for them? It makes no sense.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago

The only reason it "requires" a referendum is because Quebec went for that option in 1980, there's nothing anywhere setting the separation process in stone, so technically a referendum isn't necessary.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

I think they would instead beg for the US to let them join the Union if a Republican was in power at the time.

[-] CanadaPlus@futurology.today 1 points 1 year ago

What does it take to admit a new state? Please tell me this couldn't happen, I don't want to be American.

[-] TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

How embarrassing.

[-] Auli@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

Isn't Alberta and Saskatchewan the only provinces without electrical car rebates?

[-] pixxelkick@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

As an Edmontonian, this is perpetually exhausting.

I don't want to have to sell my house and move to Newfoundland, but it seems like maybe that's what I am going to have to do if this shit keeps up.

I have basically zero financial, cultural, spiritual, or emotional reason to stick around other than my family lives here.

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Her competency def scares me so I say go for it

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2023
64 points (98.5% liked)

Canada

7224 readers
385 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS