670

Tuberville failed to mention that he's personally prevented hundreds of officers from being promoted because he disagrees with a 2022 Pentagon policy.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 161 points 1 year ago

And you helped make it that way, cunt.

I am so exhausted of this fucken asshats.

There has got to be some recourse for us people.

[-] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

These individuals are like having repairmanman from All That show up and announce something is broken, then expect to be paid and praised to repair it but pocketing the cash and running.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

He is so obviously compromised by external interests he should be removed from office. What logic is there to this? Let him stay up there and fuck our military just because? Is it because he was democratically elected and you can't just remove them? I don't understand how theres such rampant and blatant corruption and nothing is being done.

[-] TechyDad@lemmy.world 65 points 1 year ago

I think Tuberville is trying to keep all these positions open so Trump can appoint loyalists to them should he take office in January 2025. This way, Trump can better guarantee that the military will do what he wants it to do instead of having pesky "morals" ingrained by people who know what they are doing.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago

That "project" should have been the end of the Republican Party when it became public. We are really fucken out here about to be consumed by fascism and people are okay with it. This shit doesn't go away. The entire party is compromised now and forever. You can't ever trust they aren't on a Russian payroll trying to make a coup happen again. Nobody seems appalled by this and even worse, some applaud it.

[-] Cranakis@lemmy.one 16 points 1 year ago

I relate. I'm appalled. I also don't know what to do about it. If they pack the military with loyalists we're in trouble, yet they're on track to pull it off somehow. It's terrifying.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

What I truly think at this exact moment. Its too late. They've stated civil war if Trump doesn't win, and him winning is not a good thing. A lot of institutional things tend to die quietly and the aftershock isn't felt for a while. I think we're experiencing one of these institutional deaths, the death of our functioning democracy. Keep both eyes on any MAGA you know.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

Yep. The military leaders who stood strong are the only reason his coup failed to create as much chaos. 1/6 was our Beer Hall Putsch

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] athos77@kbin.social 35 points 1 year ago

fuck our military just because?

Nope, that's just the cover. Remember how they prevented Obama from appointing federal judges and a Supreme Court seat, then speed-marched every possible conservatively-vetted candidate through as soon as they got the Senate?

Now remember how the military did not support Trump's ambitions on January 6th? They're determined to stuff the military with proto-fascists so that the next coup will have military backing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TheaoneAndOnly27@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

At this point he's so blatantly compromised and everyone knows it that he should be charged with treason and given the appropriate punishment.

[-] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

There is, and at this point it lies beyond the courts.

[-] guacupado@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

There is recourse, but no one wants to go to jail for the rest of their life afterward. Things are still too good to go that far.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 104 points 1 year ago

This is why no Republicans should ever be allowed into office.

Ever.

load more comments (49 replies)
[-] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 77 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

His actual complaint is:

"$114 million on diversity training, you gotta be kidding me," Tuberville said.

"We've got the weakest military that we've had in probably a year in my lifetime," he added. "Now we've got a lot of good military people, but infiltrating our military is all this wokeness and it's coming from the top, coming from Joe Biden, coming from Secretary of Defense Austin."

First, if it works, it's encouraging better decisions and increasing team effectiveness. I have no idea if the US military is doing a good job with this or not, but if they're doing it right they are building a better military way more cost effectively than one more fighter jet or whatever we would be using the money on.

But even if they're not doing the most effective form of training, it's 0.0075% of the defense budget. It's $40 per person employed by the department. That is extremely average for diversity training.

And lastly, this isn't like, new. The military has been doing diversity research and training since 1971. I'm sure Biden has some input if he wants it, he un-did a Trump ban on some training with an executive order, but I don't think the question of budgeting $90MM vs $114MM goes to "the top" at all.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago

"$114 million on diversity training, you gotta be kidding me," Tuberville said.

What an idiot to choose to say this.

How much has it cost the military in lawsuits and defending racism, harassment, sexual assault, and every other form of behavior that homophobes, racists, and misogynists perpetrate on those around them. How has that affected leadership, personnel readiness, quality of work? Betcha that cost is far higher than some shitty hot take on “OMG the military is soft…”

[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 28 points 1 year ago

It is a mistake to assume the right wing cares about facts. They don't use words to find or describe truth. They use them for effect.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 68 points 1 year ago

The purpose of conservatives preventing promotions is so tRump can install/promote his hand-picked leadership within the military when the time comes. This will allow him to use the military against U.S. citizens if/when he becomes president.

When he tried to use the military against U.S. citizens during his previous term, he was stopped by military leadership. They refused. Next time, he will have complete loyalty. Conservatives are setting the stage for him.

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago

This is what they should be voicing in the articles and Democrats should be calling him out for it and forcing Republicans to remove him.

Because your exactly right. Not only did Trump demand the military anytime there was a protest he also wanted to do stupid shit. Like tanks driving down the white house road during one of his speeches. They stop that too.

Trump talks about how much he loath the military because they wouldn't bend to his will.

Between project 2025 and this they are making sure Donald Trump dictatorship goes through and his will or the will of the real GOP of fascism is realized. 50 years conservatives have been planning this take over and if we don't vote for Biden and he wins. Then Trump does and America is fucked.

Then it will be civil war because I will refuse to live in a country under a christofascist dictatorship run by Trump.

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 year ago

Between project 2025 and this

Make no mistake, this is part of Project 2025. All Americans should be terrified of the GOP's long term plans.

If you don't know what Project 2025 is, educate yourself. We're watching our Republic die in front of our eyes.

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

Like tanks driving down the white house road during one of his speeches. They stop that too.

Mostly because the tanks are way too heavy for any road in DC. Seeing one crush through Pennsylvania Ave and into the metro underneath during his speech would have been even funnier than Putin and his one-tank parade.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] neanderthal@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The US Navy has more heavy aircraft carrier groups than the rest of world combined. The US has 11 out of 22. It also has the world's largest and most advanced air force. Old US Army equipment is working wonders for Ukraine against Russia, the supposed next best military.

Not to mention the US has a massive arsenal of working ICBMs and SLBMs.

I'm sorry, but nobody stands a snowballs chance in hell against the US military.

Regarding Iraq and Afghanistan, nation building and occupying are two different things. Kind of like ruling verses obtaining power are different.

ETA: Think about that during presidential elections.

[-] commandar@kbin.social 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The US has 11 out of 22.

This is only a partial picture.

The US has 11 supercarrier groups that individually rival the power of most nation's entire airforces. These are unrivaled by anything else in the world.

The US additionally has 9 America and Wasp class amphibious assault ships that have an airwing capability that rivals most other nations' carrier groups. The Navy plans for this force to eventually be made up of 11 America class ships.

So the reality is that the US' secondary aircraft carrier capability rivals that of the rest of the world combined. The total power disparity of the combined supercarrier and amphibious assault fleet is mind boggling.

[-] neanderthal@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

What's also mind boggling is the USAF F-15 has zero combat losses and is the OLD air superiority fighter. The USAF can start operating anywhere in the world with a force larger than most other air forces in < 72 hours.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Transcendant@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

You're missing the bigger picture imo. All that military might is going to be under the control of people handpicked by Trump, if he's elected and project 2025 goes to plan. Why do you think Tuberville is creating all these vacancies.

Tuberville isn't doing this for shits and giggles.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Transcendant@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago

This is the best version of the 'Eric Andre shooting someone that he then blames for being shot' meme I think I've ever, ever seen.

[-] Red_October@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago

This is the sort of thing that happens when you have people who proclaim that government doesn't work in that government. They say the system is broken, and hope you don't notice that they have been deliberately breaking it for years.

[-] TheJims@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago

He obviously doesn’t work for America like so many other Republicans. Fuck Alabama. Fuck Auburn too

[-] AlwaysNowNeverNotMe@kbin.social 35 points 1 year ago

You have to be related to Alabama to fuck it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] trackcharlie@lemmynsfw.com 36 points 1 year ago

This football coach from the ivy leagues has the audacity to pretend to know what military service is like without having educated himself at the bare minimum nor actually serving to provide a serious opinion on the matter.

The fact this incompetent malcontent continues to receive the support of his constituents is truly representative of how unbelievably fucked humanity is.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] ExfilBravo@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

Translation: Weaker = can't brain wash them into mindless murder machines like we use to be able to.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I hate those sociopaths who are all like " if you treat me with respect I'll treat you with respect."

When what they really mean is that if you treat them as an unquestioned god, they won't be as nasty as they could be.

[-] Slinky5737@infosec.pub 30 points 1 year ago

Imagine having your military undermined by a washed up football coach. I have to hope that this sentient pile of damp laundry gets what's coming to him eventually.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Additional_Prune@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

So where is the mob of MAGA patriots ready to storm the Capitol and run this guy out of town on a rail? Hello? taps mic Is this thing on?

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 25 points 1 year ago

So? It's not like Pro America Republicans will vote him out even though he's causing the United States to have the weakest military he's ever seen!

[-] AlfredEinstein@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

I've heard it theorized that the strategy is intended to starve the military of officers so that Trump can fill the vacancies with loyalists when he regains the White House. Essentially, it is the military equivalent of Project 2025.

It's not a bug. It's a feature.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I hate that you’re probably right.

They did not with the Scrotus, they’re doing it with the military

[-] profdc9@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Ah, the old chestnut of causing a problem, and then blaming it on someone else. Republican leadership is a Jonestown suicide cult, and they want all of us to drink the kool-aid.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
670 points (97.2% liked)

politics

19148 readers
2071 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS