394
Satanists, do your thing! I fucking hate these attempts to make the US a christofascist country. I wonder if there will be arguments about whether Trump, DeSantis and their ilk were Christians in 80 years.
As a Satanist, I would love to challenge this, but this one is unfortunately much more difficult to challenge than, say, the 10 Commandments because Christians managed to fuck up our national motto. And all this law is doing is requiring teachers to put our national motto up in classrooms.
It's crazy because the first amendment literally says that there should be no national religion, yet it's acceptable that "in god we trust" because it's not a specific religion. That's just such a bad faith interpretation of the law. Plus it's always the "constitutionalists" who are pushing this kind of shit, which I guess is the kind of hypocrisy we've all come to expect from them.
It shows a bias to monotheistic religions. I don't understand how that's justifiably neutral enough.
Sadly, the Supreme Court came up wit the bullshit idea of ceremonial deism and here we are.
In Satan we trust!
Social studies teacher here. Aside from the obvious church/state problems with this, there might be an easy way around it for teachers: put up a poster with a dollar bill on it. Less conspicuous, still follows the letter of the shitty law.
Could they not also put up multiple banners stating "in [yet another diety] we trust" and continue with "in [notable scholar] we trust" etc... Dilute the message intended by the law?
I like it. Surround it with "In bigfoot we trust", "in the tooth fairy we trust"
'In God we trust', followed by 'In God we trust' in Arabic. 😆
Oh please hang it up and make it say "in Allah we trust". Anti discrimination and shit.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Just hang it up in Arabic.
I hated social studies in school but the teachers were always the coolest ones. Nice to see the tradition is being carried on.
load more comments
(4 replies)
I'm all for people's religious freedoms but this kind of BS is a huge problem. They act like we are requiring the LGBTQ flag in every classroom and respond by doing the exact thing they accuse others of doing.
This is one of the hallmarks of fascist movements. Accuse your opponent of what you yourself are doing as a justification for your own bad actions. It's straight out of the Joseph Goebbels playbook. The republicans have been using it successfully for at least 30 years now, but we're going to see it used more and more blatantly as the GOP becomes more and more openly fascist.
This is the opposite of religious freedom since it imposes one religion unto everyone else.
load more comments
(35 replies)
It’s all projection.
Every thing they say, somewhere one of them is doing it.
Separation of church and state and all of that...
The SCOTUS has ruled that the phrase "In God We Trust" is not a religious statement, because the SCOTUS is a joke. That wasn't even this SCOTUS.
As long as it's only in Arabic, I'm cool with it.
Watching all those fucking hypocrites melt the fuck down would almost be worth the chaos. :D
“It doesn’t preach any particular religion at all, but it certainly does recognize a higher power.”
aka fuck atheists
Freedom of religion includes freedom from religion dumbass.
Yup. Also the largest growing philosophy, for lack of a better word, in the US. Also the one that’s most dangerous because we’re okay with ignoring their brimstone and hellfire.
It doesn’t say where it has to be displayed. Laminate that shit and put it on the floor so it can be stepped on every day.
It was on display in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying ‘Beware of the Leopard.'
R.I.P. Douglas Adams.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Your mission if you choose to accept it. Switch the ‘G’ and the ‘d’ so it says ‘ In doG We Trust. Thereby altering the meaning completely. Sit back smoke a joint and watch the chaos ensue
load more comments
(3 replies)
Hurray for regression!
In which of my gods am I supposed to trust?
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
394 points (98.0% liked)
politics
23015 readers
3059 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS