1033

Ukraine blows up main railway connection between Russia and China (www.politico.eu)

submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

159 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Ukraine’s security service blew up a railway connection linking Russia to China, in a clandestine strike carried out deep into enemy territory, with pro-Kremlin media reporting that investigators have opened a criminal case into a “terrorist attack.”

The SBU set off several explosions inside the Severomuysky tunnel of the Baikal-Amur highway in Buryatia, located some 6,000 kilometers east of Ukraine, a senior Ukrainian official with direct knowledge of the operation told POLITICO.

“This is the only serious railway connection between the Russian Federation and China. And currently, this route, which Russia uses, including for military supplies, is paralyzed,” the official said.

Four explosive devices went off while a cargo train was moving inside the tunnel. “Now the (Russian) Federal Security Service is working on the spot, the railway workers are unsuccessfully trying to minimize the consequences of the SBU special operation,” the Ukrainian official added.

Ukraine’s security service has not publicly confirmed the attack. Russia has also so far not confirmed the sabotage.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] totallynotaspy@kbin.social 360 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

OP missed the fun bit after the tunnel bombing:

The first cargo train exploded directly in the Severomuysky tunnel.

To continue transportation, the Russians began to use the detour route through the so-called Devil’s Bridge — a 35-meter high viaduct structure, which is part of the Trans-Siberian Railway. At that point, SBU saboteurs struck again.

“When the train was passing over this 35-meter high bridge, the explosive devices embedded in it went off,” the same official added.

[-] ours@lemmy.world 159 points 1 year ago

Damn impressive.

Sounds straight out of a WWII action/spy/war movie.

[-] SamsonSeinfelder@feddit.de 44 points 1 year ago

I think I played that mission in Commandos: Behind enemy Lines

[-] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 13 points 1 year ago

Officer, there isn't much to say. You'll approach the zone from the north west, find some way to gain access to the cannon and render it useless.

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

I'm sure plenty of similar things happened in every war ever.

load more comments (2 replies)

[-] Siegfried@lemmy.world 125 points 1 year ago

Thanks for the details

Just to add, according to Denys Davidov's report on ukraine, the first train was carrying jet fuel, which added to the whole explosion.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.ca 100 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Jet fuel can't blow up steel beams! Wake up sheeple!

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Jet fuel can’t blow up steel beams! Wake up sheeple!

Wasn't that the reason though that the Twin Towers in NY fell, because the jet fuel melted the steel beams infrastructure?

I had read/seen that the buildings were actually designed to handle a plane crashing into them, but the architects didn't expect the metal beams to melt from the high-temperature burning jet fuel.

[-] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

My understanding is that the beams were sprayed with a fire retardant foam that is designed to protect it in the event of a typical building fire. But the violent impact of the jets would have stripped most of it off, and the jet fuel did indeed weaken the beams. They wouldn’t have melted outright, but softening them after already being damaged by the impact was more than it could handle.

load more comments (7 replies)

[-] shottymcb@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

It didn't need to melt, raising the temperature of steel decreases it's strength.

load more comments (3 replies)

[-] StorminNorman@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

It's a conspiracy theory, and not a particularly intelligent one. Us normies like to make jokes like this mocking people who believe it, but they do actually believe it and will come up with some batshit insane logic to support their theories.

load more comments (11 replies)

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 13 points 1 year ago

Yeah it's a really dumb meme because obviously it can. The ancient Romans worked steel, so obviously it doesn't have a particularly high melting temperature.

[-] EatATaco@lemm.ee 25 points 1 year ago

Jet fuel can't melt steel beams. It doesn't burn nearly hot enough.

However, for a structure to fail you don't need to melt the beams, and getting them hot enough will also damage their structural integrity; they'll fail long before they reach the melting point.

And this is what happened on 9/11.

[-] mxcory@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 year ago

Even wood alone is capable of getting steel red hot under the right condition. Given my experience was with metal floor grating in a burn barrel. The steel became easily malleable with just a metal rod.

load more comments (7 replies)

[-] AtariDump@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Don’t wake them!

https://xkcd.com/1013/

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (4 replies)

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So they got two of three and not one of three? How is every article writer flubbing the headlines?!

[-] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 15 points 1 year ago

The magic of AI and staff cuts.

load more comments (6 replies)

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago

It must be very hard for Russia to detect Ukrainians that work under cover in Russia, this must be a major vulnerability for Russia. Unfortunately the same is probably true the other way.

[-] mierdabird@lemmy.dbzer0.com 74 points 1 year ago

Probably not so much the other way, most Ukrainians are fluent in Russian, I doubt many Russians are fluent in Ukranian

[-] someguy3@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 year ago

I wonder how many Ukrainians can only speak Russian. Languages can be hard for some people.

[-] 0ops@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

I thought I heard that zelensky himself only knew Russian until relatively recently

[-] Uncle_Bagel@midwest.social 15 points 1 year ago

They are incredibly similar languages that are more mutually intelligible, similar to Swedish/Norwegian/Danish or Serbian/Croatian/Bosnian.

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (2 replies)

[-] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 1 year ago

Can anyone explain how different the languages are? Super different or "they kind of get eachother, just are noticably different"

[-] nolannice@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

They have similar alphabets, grammar and a lot of cognates. If you only spoke one you'd be able to recognize most of a sentence with these things, but sometimes words are totally different. They probably sound similar to someone unfamiliar with both, but they are quite distinct.

load more comments (5 replies)

[-] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 22 points 1 year ago

Similar enough for mutual intelligibility but different enough that Russian only speakers will probably run into a shiboleth

load more comments (2 replies)

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Somebody once said to me that it's rather like the difference between English and Dutch.

If you ever hear Dutch it rather sounds like English and you've just not quite heard them correctly. If you were in another room and just heard the ebb and flow of the language you'd probably not be able to tell the difference, but in person directly you can.

And as a non-speaker of both languages they sound basically the same to me so I think it is true

load more comments (6 replies)

load more comments (11 replies)

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] Docus@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It is not the only railway connection. And there is still the original route from before this tunnel was built. So not sure how big the impact is.

Source wikipedia

[-] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I know virtually nothing about the Russian train system. Are all the routes able to carry the same loads? Older lines may have narrower tunnels, weaker bridges, etc. that are unable to transport the larger/heavier loads that Russia hopes to bring from China…

Edit: Track gauge is another question. I did some quick Googling and it looks like Russia used to use 1,524 mm gauge while China uses 1,435 mm. If those other lines aren’t compatible with China then it means cargo would need to be unloaded from their trains at the border and then reloaded onto Russian trains. That would slow things down tremendously.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Generally yes your lines can carry the same loads and have the same gauge. You want your internal logistics to be straightforward.

Fun fact: Russia chose a different gauge to make it more difficult to invade them.

[-] Chocrates@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

That is pretty clever

[-] someguy3@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago

They have all sorts of interesting things. Their mortars are 1mm larger diameter. So if they capture enemy supplies, they can fire them (with a little less accuracy). If the west captures Russian mortars and tries to fire them (in western barrels) they run the risk of jamming and exploding.

load more comments (3 replies)

load more comments (7 replies)

[-] nicetriangle@kbin.social 32 points 1 year ago

I'm curious whether China will take this as a personal affront and feel the need to save face by escalating their participation. That would not be ideal.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.ca 38 points 1 year ago

China really has no reason to take this as an affront. China will continue milking Russia for money/oil and let them continue weaken themselves, but they have no reason to get involved or sell them weapons.

[-] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 37 points 1 year ago

I'm no expert, please take this with a massive chunk of salt, but as far as I understand it China is trying to balance their relationship with Russia with their relationship with the US. I'd expect the reaction to a rail bombing like this to be muted and cautious.

[-] nicetriangle@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago

Good point. It has seemed recently like they're trying to make nice with the US again all of a sudden. Some of their comments after visiting San Francisco were very out of step with their rhetoric up until recently. At least as far as what I have gathered from news articles. I don't really have a great grasp on the nuances of it myself. They're a difficult government to understand sometimes.

[-] Krackalot@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 year ago

I think their trying to get a pro China movement in the west. I also think it's working.

load more comments (2 replies)

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] skozzii@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

China will just get to charge higher delivery fees with the planes, trucks and boats that will have to ship all the goods.

Good news for China, Russia need the stuff either way, it just gonna cost them more now and take longer to arrive.

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (3 replies)

[-] JimmyBigSausage@lemm.ee 25 points 1 year ago

One of 3 that exist between the two countries, I read elsewhere. If true, this is a BIG DEAL!

load more comments (7 replies)

[-] yournamehere@lemm.ee 22 points 1 year ago

awesome! SBU ftw!

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

what's SBU?

[-] Sanyanov@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Sluzhba Bezpeki Ukraini = Security Service of Ukraine, SSU Basically, Ukrainian intelligence

[-] moitoi@feddit.de 17 points 1 year ago

Ukrainian intelligence.

[-] fne8w2ah@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Dictatorships are only paper tigers inside.

load more comments

this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023

1033 points (98.9% liked)

World News

39161 readers

1390 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.