710

In two separate cases in the Southern and Central Districts of California, two U.S. Navy servicemembers were arrested for transmitting sensitive military information to the People’s Republic of China (PRC).

“These individuals stand accused of violating the commitments they made to protect the United States and betraying the public trust, to the benefit of the PRC government,” said Assistant Attorney General Matthew G. Olsen of the Justice Department’s National Security Division. “The Department of Justice will continue to use every tool in our arsenal to counter threats from China and to deter those who aid them in breaking our laws and threatening our national security.”

“These arrests are a reminder of the relentless, aggressive efforts of the People’s Republic of China to undermine our democracy and threaten those who defend it,” said Assistant Director Suzanne Turner of the FBI’s Counterintelligence Division. “The PRC compromised enlisted personnel to secure sensitive military information that could seriously jeopardize U.S. national security. The FBI and our partners remain vigilant in our determination to combat espionage, and encourage past and present government officials to report any suspicious interactions with suspected foreign intelligence officers.”

United States v. Jinchao Wei, Southern District of California

A U.S. Navy sailor, Jinchao Wei, aka Patrick Wei, was arrested yesterday on espionage charges as he arrived for work at Naval Base San Diego, the homeport of the Pacific Fleet. He was indicted for conspiracy to send national defense information to an intelligence officer working for the People’s Republic of China.

The indictment, unsealed this morning, alleges that Wei, was an active-duty sailor on the amphibious assault ship the U.S.S. Essex stationed at Naval Base San Diego. In his role as a machinist’s mate, Wei held a U.S. security clearance and had access to sensitive national defense information about the ship’s weapons, propulsion and desalination systems. Amphibious assault ships like the Essex resemble small aircraft carriers and allow the U.S. military to project power and maintain presence by serving as the cornerstone of the U.S. Navy’s amphibious readiness and expeditionary strike capabilities.

According to the indictment, in February 2022, Wei began communicating with an intelligence officer from the PRC who requested that Wei provide information about the U.S.S. Essex and other Navy ships. Specifically, the Chinese intelligence officer tasked Wei with passing him photos, videos and documents concerning U.S. Navy ships and their systems. The two agreed to hide their communications by deleting records of their conversations and using encrypted methods of communication.

At the request of the intelligence officer, between March 2022 and the present, Wei sent photographs and videos of the Essex, disclosed the locations of various Navy ships and described defensive weapons of the Essex. In exchange for this information, the intelligence officer paid Wei thousands of dollars over the course of the conspiracy.

The indictment further alleges that in June 2022, Wei sent the intelligence officer approximately 30 technical and mechanical manuals. These manuals contained export control warnings and detailed the operations of multiple systems aboard the Essex and similar ships, including power, steering, aircraft and deck elevators, as well as damage and casualty controls. The intelligence officer confirmed with Wei that at least 10 of those manuals were useful to him. For passage of those materials, the indictment alleges that Wei was paid $5,000.

In June 2022, the intelligence officer requested that Wei provide information about the number and training of U.S. Marines during an upcoming international maritime warfare exercise. In response to this request, Wei sent multiple photographs of military equipment to the intelligence officer.

In August 2022, Wei sent an additional 26 technical and mechanical manuals related to the power structure and operation of the Essex and similar ships. The manuals contained warnings that this was technical data subject to export controls and that it was deemed “critical technology” by the U.S. Navy.

The indictment further alleges that in October 2022, Wei sent a technical manual to the intelligence officer describing the layout and location of certain departments, including berthing quarters and weapons systems. Specifically, Wei sent a weapons control systems manual for the Essex and similar ships. This manual contained export-controlled data that could not be exported without a license from the U.S. government. The indictment alleges that Wei knowingly violated the International Traffic in Arms Regulations by transmitting this manual to the Chinese intelligence officer without obtaining a required license.

The intelligence officer continued to request information in 2023, including information about the overhaul and upgrades to the Essex. Specifically, he requested blueprints, especially those related to modifications to the flight deck. Wei provided information related to the repairs the Essex was undergoing, as well as other mechanical problems with similar vessels.

During the alleged conspiracy, the intelligence officer instructed Wei to gather U.S. military information that was not public and admonished him not to discuss their relationship and to destroy any evidence regarding the nature of their relationship and their activities.

“We have entrusted members of our military with tremendous responsibility and great faith,” said U.S. Attorney Randy Grossman for the Southern District of California. “Our nation’s safety and security are in their hands. When a soldier or sailor chooses cash over country, and hands over national defense information in an ultimate act of betrayal, the United States will aggressively investigate and prosecute.”

U.S. Attorney Grossman thanked the prosecution team and investigating agencies for their excellent work on this case.

The FBI and Naval Criminal Investigative Service (NCIS) investigated the case.

Assistant U.S. Attorneys John Parmley and Fred Sheppard for the Southern District of California and Trial Attorney Adam Barry of the National Security Division’s Counterintelligence and Export Control Section are prosecuting the case.

United States v. Wenheng Zhao, Central District of California

A U.S. Navy servicemember, Petty Officer Wenheng Zhao, aka Thomas Zhao, 26, of Monterey Park, California, was arrested following an indictment by a federal grand jury, charging him with receiving bribes in exchange for transmitting sensitive U.S. military information to an individual posing as a maritime economic researcher, but who was actually an intelligence officer from the PRC.

The indictment alleges that Zhao, who worked at Naval Base Ventura County in Port Hueneme and held a U.S. security clearance, received bribes from a Chinese intelligence officer in exchange for violating his official duties as a U.S. sailor by, among other actions, disclosing non-public sensitive U.S. military information.

Beginning in August 2021 and continuing through at least May 2023, at the Chinese intelligence officer’s direction, Zhao allegedly violated his official duties to protect sensitive military information by surreptitiously recording, and then transmitting to the intelligence officer, U.S. military information, photographs and videos. According to the indictment, the Chinese intelligence officer told Zhao that the intelligence officer was a maritime economic researcher seeking the information for investment decisions.

In exchange for bribes, Zhao allegedly sent the Chinese military officer non-public and controlled operational plans for a large-scale U.S. military exercise in the Indo-Pacific Region, which detailed the specific location and timing of Naval force movements, amphibious landings, maritime operations and logistics support.

The indictment further alleges that in exchange for bribes, Zhao also photographed electrical diagrams and blueprints for a radar system stationed on a U.S. military base in Okinawa, Japan.

The intelligence officer allegedly directed Zhao to conceal their relationship and to destroy evidence of the unlawful and corrupt scheme.

In exchange for the sensitive information Zhao provided – information Zhao accessed as a result of his position within the U.S. Navy – the Chinese intelligence officer paid Zhao approximately $14,866, the indictment alleges.

“By sending this sensitive military information to an intelligence officer employed by a hostile foreign state, the defendant betrayed his sacred oath to protect our country and uphold the Constitution,” said U.S. Attorney Martin Estrada for the Central District of California. “Unlike the vast majority of U.S. Navy personnel who serve the nation with honor, distinction and courage, Mr. Zhao chose to corruptly sell out his colleagues and his country.”

If convicted, Zhao faces a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison.

The FBI Los Angeles Field Office’s Counterintelligence and Cyber Division and NCIS investigated the case. IRS Criminal Investigation provided substantial assistance.

Assistant U.S. Attorneys Annamartine Salick, Sarah Gerdes, Christine Ro and Kathrynne Seiden of the Terrorism and Export Crimes Section for the Central District of California are prosecuting this case. Trial Attorney Adam Barry of the National Security Division’s Counterintelligence and Export Control Section is providing substantial assistance.

An indictment is merely an allegation. All defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

Updated August 3, 2023

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Arotrios@kbin.social 115 points 1 year ago

They committed treason for less than $15k a pop. This indicates to me that either the CCP was threatening their family members in China, or that they're just dumb as rocks.

[-] spankinspinach@sh.itjust.works 45 points 1 year ago

I'm always stunned by the numbers that ppl sell out for. I always think it's hundreds of thousands or millions, but its often like 60k... It's nuts.

But then, the CCP is very happy to bully their citizens. Until recenlty in Canada, they were having the Chinese police service muscle ppl under the guise of "diplomatic offices" for "drivers license renewals and other domestic Chinese matters."

[-] blivet@artemis.camp 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I’m always stunned by the numbers that ppl sell out for. I always think it’s hundreds of thousands or millions, but its often like 60k… It’s nuts.

Even the recent scandals about the Supreme Court are surprisingly penny-ante. Thomas sold himself for perks like a ride on a yacht.

[-] jscummy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

Hey now, give him his fair shake. He sold out for perks like multiple rides on a yacht

[-] tryptaminev@feddit.de 40 points 1 year ago

i dont know. We had members of parliament in Germany sell themselves out as political prostitutes to the regime in Azerbaidschan for as little as 8000 € (also around 8000 $ at the time). That was about a month and a half salary for them.

Some people in general are just easy sellouts.

[-] Aquagrunt@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

We're historically cheap when it comes to espionage

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] demvoter@kbin.social 91 points 1 year ago

Guess who is going to be held in jail pending trial for illegally sharing classified documents? Not trump.

[-] nuachtan@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago

This is the part that pisses me off. It should be same crime same time.

[-] tryptaminev@feddit.de 24 points 1 year ago

i am most certain that it was not the same crime for Trump. Dude stole classified docs from the white house. That is magnitudes more severe.

[-] evatronic@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

I really hope the trial is televised. I want to see the evidence, in real-time, about how and who he sold these documents to.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] WtfEvenIsExistence@reddthat.com 22 points 1 year ago

Trump is white and rich so he gets a free treason pass... Unfortunately 🤦‍♂️

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 83 points 1 year ago

They're both Chinese-American, so I hope this doesn't turn into a racist purge.

[-] money_loo@1337lemmy.com 54 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

America try not to be racist challenge.(Impossible)

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] soviettaters@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago

They are distinctly not Chinese-American, at least one of them isn't. One of them received their citizenship while selling secrets to China. He became a citizen to destroy us easier. These men were purely Chinese.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Ertebolle@kbin.social 45 points 1 year ago

This shit absolutely makes life worse for Chinese-Americans and the PRC absolutely doesn't give a fuck about that.

[-] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago

PRC: "Chinese-American? No such thing."

I feel bad for people whose country considers them a possession.

My hyphenated-american country doesn't give a shit about me in any way, and I like it that way.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] WtfEvenIsExistence@reddthat.com 29 points 1 year ago

As an American with Chinese Ancestry, I would never even think about giving information to China. As long as I hold US Citizenship, this is home to me.

(Meaning, if the US for whatever reason turn their back on me and revokes my citizenship, there's no guarantee I won't be giving secrets to whoever offers me a new home. Afterall, I don't have any duty to a country if they no longer recognizes me as a citizen. But hopefully, that doesn't happen. Such as how twice in history they've done so. Eg: Chinese Exclusion Act and Japanese Internment Camps)

[-] GameGod@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Maybe don't tell your employer this lol

[-] WtfEvenIsExistence@reddthat.com 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Lol I don't work for the government. And as I said, I'm not going to betray the US for as long as I'm a citizen. Of course, I'm not bringing up this in a job interview. But remember, corporations arent countries. If you, say, defect from a country, your new country can protect you from the former one. With corporations, you are still bound by law to not violate any non-disclosure agreements. I mean if it were legal to betray Coca-Cola and sell the Coca-Cola formula, I might actually consider it. There's nothing morally wrong about betraying corporations. But countries are different. Betraying a country endangers everyone's lives. Betraying Coca-Cola isn't gonna affect anyone except maybe a few shareholders.

I like the Constitution just fine, maybe need some amendments, but overall, the core principles are fine. Corporations? Fuck them, I couldn't care for a corporate trade secret. Who wouldn't sell a coca-cola formula if it were legal?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Szymon@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 year ago

China sets up shop in western countries to keep tabs on/utilize/threaten Chinese living and working abroad into pushing forward things beneficial to China. A few "police stations" were just identified and shut down in Canada.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

What does that have to do with what I said?

[-] Talaraine@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

That these police stations are there to put pressure on Chinese-Americans, and there's no job description or security clearance that will stop this influence.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (37 replies)
[-] EnderWi99in@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

Based on their actions, I'd say just Chinese. Not very American.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] somedude@lemmy.ninja 36 points 1 year ago

I wonder how they were caught when they were "using encrypted methods of communication." Also $14k seems like a small amount to risk ruining your life.

[-] cybersandwich@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

People sell out for so little.*

*Often these amounts are the super easily/slam dunk provable amounts. It doesn't mean they didn't get more. It means they have the receipts for these.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jcit878@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

there's "encrypted" and there's "encrypted".

And I would wager that both kinds are trivial to the intelligence committee particularly when it comes to treason

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Mikey_donuts@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago
[-] Llewellyn@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Only if allegations are true, punishment is valid. And even then death penalty is too much.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] thessnake03@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

Only a few grand per document. US needs to pay our people better, so that's not a tempting offer

[-] lemonh3ad@kbin.social 22 points 1 year ago

You’re the only user I ever followed over on reddit, glad to come across you once again.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] NegativeLookBehind@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago

“The FBI and our partners remain vigilant in our determination to combat espionage, and encourage past and present government officials to report any suspicious interactions with suspected foreign intelligence officers.”

Unless you’re a president who’s committing treason, then we just don’t know how to handle it.

[-] Furball@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

Does everything have to be about trump? Half the comments in this thread are about trump even though this has absolutely nothing to do with him.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] EnderWi99in@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
710 points (98.6% liked)

World News

38955 readers
1661 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS