47
submitted 11 months ago by mateomaui@reddthat.com to c/politics@lemmy.world

Ah, yes, people at Walmart, the trusted demographic known for often being completely oblivious to their own brand of obstruction.

all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 50 points 11 months ago

"Why are you going to impeach Biden? What has he done?"

"People at Walmart don't cotton to him."

[-] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago

That actually lines up as their best reason so far.

[-] dandan@lemmy.world 48 points 11 months ago

Lmao. Tell me this is satire.

[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 34 points 11 months ago

The GOP? Yeah, pretty much.

[-] Redhotkurt@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago

But if it's satire, then what does GOP mean? Gross Old People? Oooh I like that, we should make it a thing.

[-] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago

Gaslight

Obstruct

Project

[-] xenomor@lemmy.world 42 points 11 months ago

Nothing says ‘very serious impeachment inquiry’ quite like creating a logo and printing it on the front of your podium.

[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 21 points 11 months ago

Sort of “do you have a flag?” vibes.

[-] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

"The obese man in the mobility scooter, buying 10 cases of soda really doesn't like Biden"

[-] zeppo@lemmy.world 26 points 11 months ago

This guy is working a new record for saying particularly dumb things.

Comer responded that moderate House Republicans are more willing to vote for a Biden impeachment inquiry now because they went home over Thanksgiving and heard from their constituents at Walmart.

I'm sure that's a representative sample of the population, people who go to see their Republican rep at Walmart, and also, they couldn't have guessed that of course dedicated Republicans would be happy to see Biden impeached for anything. Not as if "let's go brandon" could have tipped them off.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 16 points 11 months ago

Republican politicians going to Walmart? Lol. They wouldn't piss on that subset of constituents if they were on fire.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

If they knew news cameras would be there to film it, they would rush down to Walmart as quickly as they could.

[-] zeppo@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

For members in rural or the weird suburban-rural districts, it might be the only reasonable place to have a political gathering.

[-] Zorque@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

Considering some of the more outspoken reps, you may actually find one (or more) in the musicals aisle giving out handjobs.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago

Confident he'll have the votes, if course, they don't have any high crimes or misdemeanors, but they'll have the votes! LOL!

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

They don't even have any traffic citations.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Taking the train pays off!

[-] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 20 points 11 months ago

Conservatives are both the joke, AND the punchline.

[-] Tikiporch@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

What, exactly, is he referring to when he says "smoking guns" have been revealed?

[-] TheJims@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

James Comer will never tire of embarrassing himself.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 2 points 11 months ago

GOP: James, quick! We need you to say something stupid to distract people from our inability to govern!

Comer: Stupid...? How about I say the smartest thing I can think of?

GOP: ...uh, yeah! That's what we meant... 👀

[-] DemBoSain@midwest.social 11 points 11 months ago

How many of these constituents do you suppose used the term "Biden Crime Family"?

Also, I can't get my rep to give me the time of day. He only invites his supporters to his "public" meetings, and doesn't publicize them before hand. It never occurred to me to wander around Wal-mart looking for him.

[-] iBaz@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

Ah yes, spend 2+ years trying to find evidence of any form of crime without success, but one visit to Walmart and now it’s time to move ahead.

[-] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

Walmart 🤣😂🤣😂🤣 They didn't not fucking step a foot in to a Walmart. That is way too close to the unwashed masses for them.

[-] Cobrachickenwing@lemmy.ca 7 points 11 months ago

House Republicans will find that this will not be another Clinton impeachment. They will find a very hostile opponent and will end Congress with nothing to show the voters in 2024.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The allegations have been denied by the White House and Hunter Biden's lawyers, with Democrats criticizing the GOP's impeachment inquiries for failing to find any meaningful evidence against the president.

Comer responded that moderate House Republicans are more willing to vote for a Biden impeachment inquiry now because they went home over Thanksgiving and heard from their constituents at Walmart.

So they heard from their constituents, 'Yes we want you to move forward, we want to know the truth and expect the Bidens to be held accountable for public corruption,'" Comer said.

Labeled as a loan repayment, the check was issued on the same date in 2018 when Americore Health LLC wired $200,000 into James Biden's bank account.

Comer maintains that the loan repayment raises questions about whether the president personally benefited from his family's business ventures.

"Even if this was a personal loan repayment, it's still troubling that Joe Biden's ability to be paid back by his brother depended on the success of his family's shady financial dealings," he said in his video statement announcing the discovery in October.


The original article contains 869 words, the summary contains 180 words. Saved 79%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 0 points 11 months ago

Good! It's about time they investigated Biden for doing the EXACT same thing as Comer in paying back a hefty family loan!

this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2023
47 points (72.0% liked)

politics

19144 readers
1190 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS