68
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Prospect Medical Holdings, a chain that owns hospitals, as well as more than 165 outpatient facilities, said ransomware hackers had breached its system.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

I used to work in social services and a suburban Philly county got attacked. I had to delay services to people with disabilities because funding couldn’t come through. These people are disgusting.

[-] MarsAgainstVenus@fedimav.win 13 points 1 year ago

Not saying these hackers are good in the least. But the sheer lack of basic security in a lot of hospitals and health services is enough to piss you off. Maybe THIS incident will encourage them to make some improvements.

[-] Nommer@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I feel bad for the poor nerd who draws the short straw and has to teach a class of doctors basic IT security practices. Going to have to rent out a football stadium in order to make room for their egos.

[-] MicroWave@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

The Prospect hack is the 157th cyberattack on a U.S. health care organization this year, said Allan Liska, a ransomware analyst at the cybersecurity firm Recorded Future. Liska said it is also the largest since October 2021, when a ransomware attack prompted CommonSpirit Health, a chain of more than 140 hospitals, to temporarily halt computer operations across the country.

[-] itsyourmom@artemis.camp 5 points 1 year ago

What the hell? That’s terrible news. I don’t understand why they’d target a hospital system at all. Seems cruel.

[-] sebinspace@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Because it’s valuable.

Have to think, these people don’t have moral codes like you or I, so trying to find the logic in morality isn’t going to get you anywhere.

Now that we’re past the obstacle of morality, we can get to the meat of it:

  1. Hospitals have valuable data and a lot of essential systems. The users of those systems would pay a lot to keep it functional and accessible.

  2. They have massive attack surface. There’s so many vulnerable points in a hospital that one could imagine, with a few insights, a few attack vectors just walking around one and being observant.

  3. The staff often aren’t educated in proper practices, the dos and don’ts of infosec, and are also often overworked and very tired. This leaves them vulnerable to phishing attacks, tailgating, you name it. Trained about tailgating? A lot of them use RFID cards to access specific areas, and cloning those is trivial.

TL;DR hospitals are valuable and (sadly) easy targets.

[-] resurrexia@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Information to ransom, among other things that sebinspace said.

HIV diagnosis? STD diagnosis? Someone on hormones for gender-affirmijg purposes? Abortions? In places where these may or may not be legal or safe for such knowledge to be public, victims aren’t likely to think twice before panicking and paying up to not have their data leaked.

[-] Infiction@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

This is awful. Sick kids hospital in Toronto got attacked earlier this year but the group apologised and gave the decrypt key without payment. This is the least they could do here too.

this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2023
68 points (100.0% liked)

News

23305 readers
3590 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS