227
submitted 11 months ago by DontMindMe@zirk.us to c/fuck_cars@lemmy.ml

Driving 8 hours round trip today to pick up one person, and I'll never understand why Americans think this is more convenient than my colleague taking a train.

#FuckCars #WarOnCars #TheWarOnCars #Urbanism #CarBrain #PublicTransportation #lightrail @fuck_cars #PublicTransit

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] verdigris@lemmy.ml 96 points 11 months ago

Yeah it's not that we don't want to use the train, it's that the train has been successfully turned into an objectively worse option in every way thanks to decades of lobbying and underfunding. If there even is a reasonable train route between your destinations, it would likely take 2-4x as long as driving, be 4-10x more expensive than the gas for the drive, and would be an uncomfortable and unpleasant experience that would still require a pickup and decently long drive (or further use of the barely functional public transit system) to get to the final destination.

If you're not a shipping container, there basically is no public transit infrastructure in the US. It only exists in cities that have chosen to make significant investments in it, and even then in most places it's like one arterial light rail and then some busses with crappy coverage. For anything between cities or states, it's nearly the same price as flying to get a charter bus or train ticket.

The only thing that would solve this problem is extremely aggressive and unpopular legislation, or some benevolent trillionaire to actually do a hyperloop type project without immediately coopting it into just a shittier highway. Market forces and city governments will never create real interstate transit networks. Less aggressive legislation making it more expensive to keep and especially buy/make new cars would help, but it's political suicide to say "I'm going to tax the good that almost every voter, and especially the ones with money and influence, have and use every day".

[-] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 18 points 11 months ago

Intercity rail is being built and improved on in CA, TX, FL, and the north east. The main issue is the terrible city planning in every city. City planners need to be brave enough to build non-car-dependent neighborhoods, and zoning restrictions need to be brought into the 21st century to allow that.

[-] squaresinger@feddit.de 6 points 11 months ago

Intercity rail is only really useful if you have good public transport in both cities. It does defeat the purpose if you need a car to get to and from the train station.

[-] bluGill@kbin.social 13 points 11 months ago

@verdigris

@fuck_cars @DontMindMe Market forces cannot give you a good transit network as the market needs to compete against roads which are essentially free. Adding insult to injury, if you try you will discover that your taxes are going to support the road network you are trying to compete against.

Private transit did very well in the US until regulations (NYC didn't allow subways to charge market rates and thus they went bankrupt) and the highway system messed things up. So long as things like that are a risk you would be a fool to invest in private transit.

[-] Gabu@lemmy.ml 7 points 11 months ago

NYC didn’t allow subways to charge market rates and thus they went bankrupt

Simple solution: full statization of public transport infrastructure. Look at Europe (or even Brazil, ffs) - the state can afford to freeze prices or make the service free, if taken as a priority (which it is).

[-] bluGill@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

@Gabu

@fuck_cars @DontMindMe @verdigris NYC did that, but they didn't invest at all into maintenance beyond the minimum. Thus their subways are over crowded, and use obsolete systems that are unable to run modern service.

[-] CommunityLinkFixer@lemmings.world 1 points 11 months ago

Hi there! Looks like you linked to a Lemmy community using a URL instead of its name, which doesn't work well for people on different instances. Try fixing it like this: !fuck_cars@lemmy.ml

[-] autumn@beehaw.org 12 points 11 months ago

there happens to be a great train from my town to the next that:

  • is a lot cheaper than a ride share (only $7 for 30-40 miles)
  • your bike rides for free
  • is quicker or at least the same amount of time as driving
  • picks you up and drops you off downtown

my only complaint is that it only runs 4 times per day, and it can’t really be used as a commuter train or getting home late because of the hours. most people here (raleigh and durham) don’t even know it’s an option.

[-] Caradoc879@lemmy.world 53 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

In America the train costs as much as a plane ticket. Driving is cheaper. We also have very little in the way if trains. Most of our long distance travel is by bus. Tiny, dirty, cramped busses where if someone takes a shit in the toilet everyone smells it for hours. I would rather drive.

[-] DontMindMe@zirk.us 9 points 11 months ago

@Caradoc879
True, but it's a bit more than that. They seem to think that cars are always the ultimate in convenience. I know a couple that opted to drive in central London instead of taking the tube. 🙄

[-] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 21 points 11 months ago

That's because there's a weirdly narrow subset of our population that have both experience with public transportation being available, and it being nice.
If your only experience with public transit was a slow, infrequent and unreliable bus that reeked of piss and came by once every two hours with no way to know if it's running late or cancelled, you'd also come to the conclusion that a car was more convenient.

It's one of those self fulfilling prophecy things. People expect public transportation to be awful, so they don't use it, so usage numbers drop making sure funding gets cut further.

[-] bluGill@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago

@DontMindMe

@fuck_cars @Caradoc879 People - including you - are creatures of habit. I've seen people drive to a neighbor's house even though they had to park in the street and thus the total walk was more than if they had just walked - when the only option for almost everything is to drive you don't think of alternatives when/if they would be viable.

[-] CommunityLinkFixer@lemmings.world 0 points 11 months ago

Hi there! Looks like you linked to a Lemmy community using a URL instead of its name, which doesn't work well for people on different instances. Try fixing it like this: !fuck_cars@lemmy.ml

[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 8 points 11 months ago

In America the train costs as much as a plane ticket. Driving is cheaper.

Damn, is it that bad in the states? I just did a quick lookup for Toronto to Montreal by train, and it's about the same price as driving (maybe less, depending on the cost of gas that day).

But the convenience, and not wasting two people's lives, makes it totally worth taking a train.

[-] ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social 7 points 11 months ago

Bruh it's that bad here. Eastern Canadians are lucky, in Western Canada within cities it's barely acceptable in some cases and as bad as the average US city in many others. You will not find an inter city train in BC, Alberta, Saskatchewan or Manitoba that actually connects you to where you want to go. Via Rail is an absolute JOKE and I'm literally hundreds of kilometers away from the nearest station.

[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago

Man, that sucks :(

[-] dankm@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago

It's worse than that. The SK government used to run a bus service all over the province. They shut it down, expecting a private company to take over. To the surprise of absolutely nobody now we have no transportation at all between cities and towns that isn't the occasional plane or cars.

[-] Delusional@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I'm glad to be living on the west coast where we have Amtrak. Amtrak round trip from sac to SF and back is only like $20. Busses pretty much run everywhere in the city too so you don't absolutely need a car/uber to get around.

[-] bluGill@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

@Showroom7561

@fuck_cars @DontMindMe @Caradoc879 Pretty much or worse. If you have a family it gets even worse - I'm trying to take my family - 3 kids and driving is the only reasonable option - gas is cheap, 3 nights in hotels on the way, and a few restaurants along the way. We save at least $3000 vs flying - I gave up on Amtrak when I realized it was going to take even longer than driving and was at least $1000 more (I'm not sure if I gave up at one-way price or the round trip price) At that price I can afford to spend a few days in a car. We will just make sure to see something on the way - though having done the trip before I'm not sure what is left.

[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago

No doubt!! You have to consider several factors, and sometimes, taking a car is the best option. But as you say, it works out better when you have an entire family.

The OP only described one colleague who could have used the train on their own, rather than a single car for two passengers (one of which wasn't part of the travel). I guess in the OPs case, you'd have to also consider whether they were being paid work hours for that drive.

So in this case, I think a train (assuming it was accessible and economical) would have been the better option for the OPs colleague. LOL

[-] CommunityLinkFixer@lemmings.world 1 points 11 months ago

Hi there! Looks like you linked to a Lemmy community using a URL instead of its name, which doesn't work well for people on different instances. Try fixing it like this: !fuck_cars@lemmy.ml

[-] overzeetop@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Mostly. If your locality is served by Amtrak - and only a few dozen cities are out of the 3 million square miles of ConUS - then it can be somewhat convenient and cost effective if you plan your travel more than 2-3 months in advance. It’s about 2/3 the speed of car travel, but more comfortable, generally. If you buy tickets less than 3 weeks ahead the prices are about 4x what they are for booking at 3-6 months out. Also, unless you live in one of the 2-3 hub areas, trains run only once or twice a day. For comparison, Last time I checked it’s like £70 to go from London to Aberdeen and takes 7 hours and trains leave every hour or two. From Roanoke to New York - 80 miles closer than the UK route I know of - it’s $200, 9 hours, and only two trains run per day - the first departs at 6:20am, the second at 4:15p (and gets in around 2am). It’s only a 7.5 hour drive and $40-50 in gas to go from Roanoke to NYC, and it’s pretty easy to park outside the city and take a commuter train in.

Oh, and there’s no workable hub and spoke system due to the few trains and long travel times. My daughter is just 300 miles away at school and the city has a train stop. It’s a 5 hour drive one way. It takes two days and 3 train changes to get from her city to the closest station to me, about a 45 minute drive away. It’s ridiculous.

load more comments (16 replies)
[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 7 points 11 months ago

Holy shit 8 hours is terrible. When I pick someone up from the airport is a 1 hour round trip. There's a reasonably conveniently-located train option, except that its inconveniently infrequent off-peak, costs $20 per person, and takes an hour. All of which unfortunately makes driving kind of a no-brainer. The ridiculous cost is one thing that could be easily fixed and frequency wouldn't be too much of a problem given the political will, but travel time is a little trickier. It sucks that under current conditions, driving is so much more convenient.

[-] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 months ago

You might be better off having him rent a car where he is and then return it where he's going.

[-] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 2 points 11 months ago

Because to them being able to drive 4 hours one way in a day is somehow more "liberating" than taking a train. Even going the same distance, they for some reason think its better to drain multiple tanks of gas (at $4.50 a gallon where I am) to go that distance than to purchase a $20 dollar train ticket and do the same distance while being able to read, play games, whatever.

[-] DontMindMe@zirk.us 8 points 11 months ago

@scrubbles
I think it also has something to do with sharing space with other people, which they're not used to.

[-] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 4 points 11 months ago

I have midwest friends who have admitted this, that they don't like sharing a space. This is generally just a problem with rural people, they shut themselves out from the general public for so long that they get fearful of anyone outside of their social norms.

Which of course I say "Get tougher and deal with it", your fear of other people shouldn't drive society. (But that's human history - aint it)

[-] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Is it a strange thing to admit to? I spent half my childhood in New York City (including taking the subway every day) and I still don't like sharing a space with other people. It's a common preference and I don't see why it should be respected less than, for example, a preference to avoid loud noises and noxious odors would be when choosing how to live.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] greenhorn@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

Not as a "well actually" but just a different example: I regularly see Mennonites on Amtrak, which is maybe out of necessity, but their norms are very different from the diverse people on the train. I don't like sharing space on the road. I'm generally a calm pacifist until I'm around other drivers

[-] VelvetStorm@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Hey bud, almost no one thinks that. Idk where the hell you are pulling that info from but most people would love to not have to own cars and pay so much of their income on it. Also how much do you think train tickets cost in the usa cuz its not 20 fucking bucks. It can be several hundred dollars like just as much as plane tickets depending on where you are and where you are going.

[-] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 1 points 11 months ago

I actually was agreeing with you? Maybe I worded it wrong? I'm in the PNW and coach from Portland to Seattle is about 20ish, probably more like 30, and it's 4 hours away, so that's my example

[-] RattlerSix@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Where are you picking them up from, the train station? Because the closest one to me is an 8 hour round trip away.

[-] version_unsorted@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago

That is the problem. Need more trains, stations and routes.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
227 points (93.5% liked)

Fuck Cars

9818 readers
60 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS