I think now is the best time in all of human history to be alive

Europeans Negotiate the Conflict Behind Ukraine's Back: Lavrov

The Russian foreign affairs minister described the situation as an act of hypocrisy and cunning.

On Friday, Russian Foreign Affairs Minister Sergey Lavrov stated that several European leaders have attempted over the past six months to negotiate with Moscow regarding the Ukrainian conflict without involving Kiev.

"Certain well-known Western leaders, particularly one, through three different channels, have sent signals for us to meet and discuss what to do about Ukraine and European security," he said during a press conference alongside his Belarusian counterpart, Sergey Aleinik.

Lavrov, who stated he neither wanted nor had the right to "mention names," described this situation as an act of hypocrisy and cunning.

Western politicians "have five Fridays every week and lie shamelessly. When they declared and continue to declare by inertia that they will not negotiate anything about Ukraine without Ukraine, this is nothing but hypocrisy," he noted.

The Russian diplomat indicated that the contacts were not direct leader-to-leader, despite politicians having "direct access" to their Moscow counterparts. "But these are the tricks we have observed over the last six months," he added.

"If someone is interested in ending attempts to ensure their security at the expense of others' security, ending attempts to restrict Russia's legitimate interests and the legitimate interests of Russians living in many countries on our continent, then welcome. We are always ready to seriously discuss these issues," Lavrov affirmed.

However, he ruled out Moscow being willing to negotiate with those who condition future contacts on Russia's defeat in Ukraine.

Russia has declared multiple times that it is open to negotiations with Ukraine and blames Kiev for rejecting dialogue under the decree of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, prohibiting any dialogue with President Vladimir Putin.

Lavrov also accuses the West, particularly the United Kingdom, of persuading Zelensky to reject the Istanbul Agreements reached between Russia and Ukraine in April 2022.

The Council of the Organization of American States approved the resolution proposed by the United States, which condemns the actions trying to block the transition of power in Guatemala.

https://archive.is/BNY7Q

(Additional words of satire have been grafted onto the article by me.)

Slimes of Isra-hell say

Army in response to white phosphorus report: IDF only uses legal weaponry

By herr EMANUEL von FABIAN

In response to a report by the Washington Post earlier today, which says the IDF used white phosphorus shells during an attack in southern Lebanon, the military says, “The IDF only uses legal weaponry.”

So did the nazis

“The main smoke shells used by the IDF do not contain white phosphorus. Similar to many Western armies, the IDF also has smoke shells that contain white phosphorus, which are legal according to international law, and the choice to use them is influenced by operational considerations and availability compared to alternatives,” the IDF says.

We don't use whisky pete, but we have a shitton of it and it's totally legal to use. But we don't use it, of course.

“These shells are intended for smokescreens, and not for an attack or ignition, and they are not legally defined as incendiary weapons,” it continues.

Smokescreen for burning civilians alive

The IDF says that under its existing procedures, white phosphorus shells are not to be used in urban areas, “except in certain exceptional cases.”

Which means they're totally used in urban areas

“These restrictions are in line with international law, and are even stricter than [the latter],” the IDF says.

Strictly pencil-whipping the legal mumbo-jumbo so it's in compliance on paper

The Washington Post report wrongly claims Israel pledged in 2013 to stop using white phosphorus, while in fact the military said it would limit the use, largely moving to use other means to create smokescreens for troops. However, it has reserved the right to use such shells in certain, undisclosed cases that have been approved by the Supreme Court (the uses were not detailed to the public for reasons of security).

The zionists do not lie except when they're caught mid-lie, then it is the whistle-blower that's lying. Zionists are always on the right side of history no matter what the truth is.