Threads accounts will be available on Mastodon and other services that use the ActivityPub protocol. : fediverse

[-] DmMacniel@feddit.de 45 points 11 months ago

Let's not, okay? I don't want corpo shit in my free fediverse.

[-] themusicman@lemmy.world 33 points 11 months ago

So join an instance which shares that opinion...

[-] ElBarto@sh.itjust.works 12 points 11 months ago

No, only the people I like are allowed to play on this public playground....

But it won't matter once Lemmy brings in instance blocking for users.

[-] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago

It's an existing feature of Kbin and it;s quite cool

[-] ElBarto@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago

Yeah some of the apps I've used have it but can't wait to just have it linked to my account so I don't have to reblock them.

[-] Fitik@kbin.social 6 points 11 months ago

@DmMacniel Just be on instance that is defederated from them, done

@fossilesque

[-] mkhoury@lemmy.ca 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

That doesn't actually fix the issue. If Facebook is trying to set itself up like Chrome with the webplatform, or GTalk with XMPP, then they will drive the feature set of ActivityPub, whether you're federated with them or not.

Hypothetical example:

Want to see this picture/video from someone on Threads? You need Facebook's proprietary picture format, which has DRM baked in it. Even if you don't federate, Mastodon, Lemmy, etc now have to take energy away from their work to adopt the proprietary picture format. It depends on the proportion Threads takes on the network and how they can leverage that position to put pressure.

Threads currently has voice notes. Should all ActivityPub services support that? If so, do we adhere to Threads' standard or not?

[-] damon@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

They don’t have to take energy to adopt the format. You do realise that current ActivityPub services don’t support all services and features of the other platforms? You realise a great deal of Fediverse utilises Mastodon’s implementation of AP? So a lot of what people are worried about Threads doing has already been done by Mastodon.

[-] mkhoury@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It was just an example. The same can happen at the Mastodon-level instead of the Fediverse-level. Since there is some desired interop (e.g. between Mastodon and Lemmy), services do influence each other in their feature set.

I'm not sure what you mean by "a lot of what people are worried about Threads doing has already been done by Mastodon". Do you mean that the decisions that Mastodon make influence the rest of the Fediverse? If so, let's make sure we understand the difference here: Threads has a much more hostile disposition. Mastodon seems to have incentives aligned with the rest of the Fediverse services, and probably deserves the benefit of the doubt; Facebook has abused that benefit time and time again.

[-] damon@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

No, I'm talking about making extensions to the protocol that becomes the defacto standard

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 29 points 11 months ago

no thank you

[+] velox_vulnus@lemmy.ml 24 points 11 months ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

[deleted]

[-] 0xtero@kbin.social 51 points 11 months ago

Not more than it is now. Everything is already public so if they need it, they've already been collecting it. This doesn't really change anything.

[-] h3ndrik@feddit.de 16 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

And it's how federation is supposed to work. Either you want to send your content to other instances or you don't. But federation is the wrong tool if you want to stay alone. You can defederate and block them if you don't like their terms.

[-] DarkThoughts@kbin.social 11 points 11 months ago

Even without federation / specific protocols. You can just take about any sort of content on the internet pretty easily if you wanted to. Search engine crawlers do something similar, otherwise search results would just not work at all.

[-] PropaGandalf@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Couldn't instances or accounts just license their content? Like would it be legally binding if I write in my profile that all the content I wrote here is licensed under a specific CC license?

[-] 0x1C3B00DA@kbin.social 9 points 11 months ago

Genius (the lyrics company) tried to license the content on their website and a judge said that can't be legally binding because there's no guarantee the scraper read it. It seems like the same would apply here.

[-] h3ndrik@feddit.de 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Seriously doubt that. If I pirate a book, game or TV series and don't read the copyright, it's still illegal. Same should apply to other written text like on a website.

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 6 points 11 months ago

Copyright is a law. Everything is copyrighted, with or without the little (C). Licensing is a peer-to-peer contract. Unless you can prove the other side is aware of and agreed to a contract, it doesn't bind them.

Notably, licensing often is needed because general copyright exists. The license grants them the right to copy your full text or whatever, and if they didn't agree to it, then they had no right to copy it. There are exceptions for excerpts and search indexing and the like, but they can't (legally) just take all your posts because you put them online.

That all said, big companies have already been doing mass copyright violations for AI, so copyright or licenses don't necessarily mean anything unless you can force them to comply. There are lawsuits on AI scraping now. Because the end result is either making up some reason that copyright doesn't ban copying if you do enough of it or making LLMs effectively illegal and putting some massive corporations on the hook for mass violations against basically everyone online, I wouldn't personally bet the courts ruling against the corporations.

[-] 0x1C3B00DA@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago

It looks like I was mixing up some facts. The Genius case was denied because genius doesn't own the copyright to the lyrics they were publishing. I can't find the case now, but there was a case where a judge said scraping was allowed because it wasn't a given that the scraper had read a ToS.

[-] PropaGandalf@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

What if it was built into the website? Like included in the HTML or something?

[-] h3ndrik@feddit.de 7 points 11 months ago

We should open a feature request. An additional license selection field upon posting on Lemmy, or a default setting to license every post and comment from a user account would be awesome. And free/libre culture fits well within this ecosystem.

[-] PropaGandalf@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

That would be great. It would be similar to choosing a language for each post.

[-] Helmic@hexbear.net 9 points 11 months ago

It aleady has been. Anything, anything publicly posted and available will be harvested by, at a minimum, Google spiders. The only privacy benefits of any site can only be promises that they won't share the information that you don't publicly list.

And even then,.all it takes is the feds raiding a dipshit Kolektiva admin to get that information illegally anyways.

Do not organize serious actions over social media. At most, hold sensitive discussions over private, E2E encrypted chats like Matrix.

[-] spudwart@spudwart.com 7 points 11 months ago

Honestly. This is a social network platform. Assume all you post and share is being collected via web crawlers and data brokers pulling from the api.

[-] doleo@kbin.social 24 points 11 months ago

Oh, fuck. He's optimistic

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

that general purpose ai model is really coming along, aint it. i hear its got legs now

[-] HootinNHollerin@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

VR

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 3 points 11 months ago

this was a joke regarding the robotic nature of zuck. intimating his artificial origination. but now its not funny, cuz i had to say that.

[-] MajorHavoc@lemmy.world 22 points 11 months ago

I'm all for companies participating in open source communities... but this is the company that routinely blocks me from viewing my aunt's reposts of Russian state sponsored racist propeganda just because I don't install the incredibly invasive mobile app.

I can imagine a few ways that this could go wrong...

[-] 0xtero@kbin.social 15 points 11 months ago

Will be interesting to see how they deal with nazis and CSAM from all the Japanese servers.

[-] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 17 points 11 months ago

This is just posts on Threads being pushed out to Mastodon.

Still no way to publish to Threads users from outside the walled garden.

[-] 0xtero@kbin.social 9 points 11 months ago

Yeah will be interesting to see if they enable two-way federation. It's problematic for them

[-] h3ndrik@feddit.de 6 points 11 months ago

I think even the Fediverse as is, has done an alright job with that.

[-] Deceptichum@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago

It’ll fit at home with their users.

[-] Jaytreeman@kbin.social 14 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Anyone know of kbin or Lemmy instances that will insta de-federate from anything meta?

Edit: missed the 'de'

[-] azdle@news.idlestate.org 14 points 11 months ago

Assuming you meant de-federate, there are a few listed on https://fedipact.online/ that seem to be lemmy instances.

[-] Oha@lemmy.ohaa.xyz 5 points 11 months ago

I myself already did. Many big instances also do

[-] timconspicuous@lemmy.ml 9 points 11 months ago

I'm very curious how this will all shake out. I can understand all of you who want to block Threads and the only two instances that I am on myself are going to do exactly that, but it seems tremendously likely that the flagship instance of the fediverse, mastodon.social, will federate and it will have a massive impact on not just the culture, but also on the codebase. For example I wonder what services will go for feature parity and add features like voice notes which Threads added recently. Oh and culture-wise, with POTUS joining Threads, big institutions like the White House will suddenly appear on the fediverse.

Still holding out hope that a bunch of new users and new ideas will rejuvenate the fediverse, in any case 2024 should be a big year for it.

[-] PanArab@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago

I’m not against Threads joining fedi. That’s where most of the Arabic content is and it is nice that it will be easier to share.

[-] Delusion6903@discuss.online 1 points 11 months ago

I look forward to the additional people Threads could bring here. Once the conversations are both directions I think many people will migrate to this side to avoid ads and Meta.

[+] JoYo@lemmy.ml -9 points 11 months ago

no it won’t. yall dont read.