Tommy Tuberville Proclaims Ukraine ‘Can’t Win’ Over Russia: ‘It’s a Junior High Team Playing a College Team’ (www.mediaite.com)

submitted 1 year ago by FlyingSquid@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

33 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Stupidest man in the Senate.

top 32 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The United States, my country, is a gold plated shithole. A garbage country and society in name only with a sociopathic culture of "whether I got mine or not, fuck you."

That being said, we are the absolute best, God like relatively speaking, at one thing and one thing only: Warfare. The killing lots of humans in high volume business. We have no peer in that one respect.

In this tortured metaphor, that high school team has the advantage of being aided in technology, tactics, and intelligence by the entirety of the NFL.

[-] paddirn@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

And that high school team has absolutely ran up the score board against the college team, making them look like chumps. So in retaliation, the college team tackles the high school teams cheerleaders and fans on the sidelines.

[-] Shrek@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

So eloquently put.

[-] LarryTheMatador@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

I'm sure there's a ( R )eason.

[-] ATQ@lemm.ee 30 points 1 year ago

Tommy Tuberville the military hating Putin sycophant? That Tommy Tuberville?

[-] bauhaus@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 year ago

meanwhile, Russia is pulling its 80-year-old Soviet war machines out of mothballs just to keep up with Ukraine’s “Junior High Team"

[-] I_AM_CORNHOLIO@startrek.website 18 points 1 year ago

Oh look, another republican traitor publicly fellating putin.

[-] potterpockets@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago

Alone? Probably not. But that doesnt mean it isnt worth fighting. And they dont stand alone either.

Weird how that kinda also applied to 13 colonies facing the British circa 1776 Tommy, eh? You smooth-brained cock-wipe of a half-wit.

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Proclame here proclame there...

Seems to me Russia is getting its butt kicked severely!

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Now I’m convinced Ukraine will win.

[-] Digital_man@lemmy.one 7 points 1 year ago

By that logic we would have lost the American Revolution.

[-] Pratai@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

It’s a junior high team paying against a college team that never learned how to play football.

[-] Reptorian@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 year ago

Meanwhile, Russia are losing artilleries, areas controlled, and had over 250K killed as a result of combat. That being said, Ukraine can defeat them and we will continue supporting them.

[-] Vlhacs@reddthat.com 5 points 1 year ago

So because one country is weaker we should allow the stronger nation to simply take it over?

[-] ganksy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Why do we even take any of this B's for face value? He's just a shill teeing up the narrative for his financers.

[-] yata@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

We aren't taking them at face value. His voters probably are though.

[-] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago

Mitch McConnell is barely with it and Lindsey Graham is paralyzed by fear of getting named in Georgia's case against Trump, so Putin has had to put his 3rd string on the field.

[+] K1nsey6@lemmy.world -25 points 1 year ago

This war isn't meant to be won, it's meant to be continuous. And the US is killing Ukrainians and Russians in the name of protecting MIC profits.

[-] Deceptichum@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago

Yeah, nah.

This war is Russia killing Ukrainians. Russia made the decision to invade a foreign country. Russia has all the blame.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

I'm not an expert on these things, but I'm pretty sure Russians and Ukrainians are doing a fine job of killing each other without direct U.S. intervention.

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Funny how the war would end tomorrow if Russia went back the fuck home.

[-] Pratai@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago

Lol… whatever you say, Ivan.

[-] EnderWi99in@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

You're hilarious.

[+] jwiggler@sh.itjust.works -9 points 1 year ago

Don't forget that it's politically advantageous to have a big bad enemy country to unite your party. For Democrats, it's Russia. For Republicans, it's China.

Obviously both Russia and China are authoritarian as all fuck, but Israel is an authoritarian occupier as well, and we're perfectly fine with them.

[-] Reptorian@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Democratic Party are also against China.

- Signed, a millennial Democrat against China.

[-] jwiggler@sh.itjust.works -5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sure, but who isn't "against" China in the West? They commit atrocities left and right.

But I think it'd be more difficult to find many who'd support military conflict with China, proxy or otherwise.

Edit: honestly, scratch that. I think it would be pretty easy to get popular support for a conflict with China, in the same way it was easy to get popular and unwavering support for a conflict with Russia

[-] Ersatz86@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Hard to tell, is that a double, trifecta, or grand slam of whattaboutism?

In any case, hats off. Your skills are on point.

[-] jwiggler@sh.itjust.works -5 points 1 year ago

I mean, there's really only one whataboutism in my comment (what about Palestine and Israel), but sure, you can say there are four in there.

And honestly I think it's a fair point. The US is not purely interested in defending nation states from authoritarian occupation, because if we were, we'd not support the state of Israel in their oppression of Palestinians. So there must be other factors behind our support for Ukraine, some might be legitimate (protecting Ukrainian exports to keep global economy stable) and others not so much (protecting profits for private arms companies). And I think it's more likely the latter, considering the size of our "defense" budget.

What do you have to say to that? I'm interested in your take, not in you just accusing me of whataboutism.

load more comments

this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2023

96 points (93.6% liked)

politics

19120 readers

2105 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News