287

• Controversial game The Day Before will have servers shut down in January 2024, just 45 days after its troubled launch.

• Developer Fntastic has closed down and the entire project will cease to exist, leaving players unable to purchase or play the game.

• Steam will automatically refund remaining players and Mytona, the investor, has been collaborating with Steam to facilitate refunds for all purchasers.

all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] RaincoatsGeorge@lemmy.zip 176 points 11 months ago

This was a scam from the start. They fucked themselves because their trailer was popular and they promised the world. Their goal was to create a shit early access game with pre-made assets, get lots of buy in when it was released, endure some bad reviews, promise to fix things but then slowly dump support for the game. I've watched this exact thing happen probably ten times now.

What killed them was the hype and popularity. They were called out immediately for what they were doing and got stuck having to now make an actual game or face legal repercussions.

At the very least these cash grabs are getting spotted early and they're not getting to sneak by without facing consequences.

[-] PrettyLights@lemmy.world 56 points 11 months ago

Due to the way Steam refunds work I feel this wasn't their end goal unless they really didn't think it through at all.

The theory i subscribe to is that they intended to release a "decent" game but had no experience or intent to make it themselves. The marketing hype machine was to build community hype, which would drive investor funding so they could pay for new talent or to just outsource most of the work. I'm guessing that either didn't materialize or they mismanaged that plan.

[-] thoughtorgan@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I don't think they intended to release anything ever. But there was so much attention an them they had to release something.

They got funding from a Kickstarter right?

[-] PrettyLights@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Nope, no Kickstarter or obvious public funding before the early access "release".

There's a chance some people weren't able to get refunded but due to Steam's refund policy I suspect most got their money back.

If it was always intended to be a total scam and never release they'd likely have used their own launcher to bypass the Steam revenue share and refund policy.

[-] LinyosT@sopuli.xyz 1 points 10 months ago

They’ve got a history of releasing games and abandoning them.

So I believe this was an attempt at doing the same thing just that TDB ended up getting far more attention than their previous game.

[-] osprior@lemmy.world 49 points 11 months ago

Is it still a scam if everyone gets their money back?

This just feels more like incompetence rather than malice.

[-] loobkoob@kbin.social 54 points 11 months ago

I don't think consumers were the target of the scam; if they were, I don't see a reason why they wouldn't have accepted pre-orders for the game. In fact, I think they know that accepting pre-orders would have left them open to false advertising lawsuits which is why they didn't go for them, and I think they were well aware that people could just refund the game so trying to scam consumers (in this instance) was probably not worth attempting.

Instead, I think the investors were the target. The brothers who own(ed?) the studio have been living off investor money for the last few years, and which how suspicious their finances are (their ludicrously high travel expenses, in particular) I'm sure they've hidden away a bunch more money.

The game that exists is a shameless, cheaply-made asset flip that I suspect only exists at all because it makes it much harder for investors to sue for fraud when there's an actual product. If they'd just tried to take the money and run without releasing anything it'd be obvious fraud, but now they can claim they tried their best, expectations were too high, etc, and it's difficult for the investors to prove otherwise.

[-] LanternEverywhere@kbin.social 5 points 10 months ago

This makes the most sense by far. Owners of a company always pay themselves a salary, and for a tech company with investors I'm sure these people were able to give themselves an extremely high salary. That salary money is legally their money forever no matter how crappy or failed the company's output winds up being. Unless you can prove that an actual crime was committed to acquire that money, then it will remain legally theirs.

[-] Carighan@lemmy.world 24 points 11 months ago

This just feels more like incompetence rather than malice.

Yeah although I would argue one does not preclude the other. As in, of course with Hanlon's Razor, this is because of incompetence not malice. But it's also a scam, just one born out of not being any smarter/better.

[-] RaincoatsGeorge@lemmy.zip 9 points 11 months ago

I'd agree with you but then you hear about all the sketch shit with the discord and the volunteers. I think they intended to make a game but planned for it to just be a quick cash grab and then they could just slowly dump it. It's honestly a great strategy, just look at every game the atlas devs have made. They've basically mastered the strategy.

[-] OwlPaste@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Scam is still scam, they could have been realising true gameplay trailers instead of wasting time on rendered false gameplay that does not reflect a game at all

[-] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 2 points 11 months ago

I mean, it still would represent an attempt at a scam

[-] LanternEverywhere@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago

Yeah a failed scam is still a scam.

[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Technically yes it's still a scam. It's just one that didn't pan out for them. In this one particular instance anyways. It will continue to work for others.

[-] WashedOver@lemmy.ca 5 points 11 months ago

I get the impression there is a lot of this bait and switch in the mobile gaming circuit with great game play shown on IG ads but the actual gameplay is nothing like advertised?

[-] EuroNutellaMan@lemmy.world 63 points 10 months ago

Lasted less than Liz Truss lmaooo

[-] ReasonablePea@sh.itjust.works 36 points 11 months ago

I was so confused by the headline, kept waiting to see what the name of the game was

[-] pulverizedcoccyx@lemmy.ca 13 points 11 months ago

All it needed was to not have all the words capitalized, just the game name.

[-] uvok@pawb.social 6 points 10 months ago
[-] EmergMemeHologram@startrek.website 3 points 11 months ago

The should have been “Servers For Game The Day Before Shutting Down After Just 45 Days”

[-] AnActOfCreation@programming.dev 18 points 11 months ago

That's still confusing lol. I think the only thing that would've helped is quotes around the game title.

[-] LunchEnjoyer@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

Refund the game while you still can, if you were silly enough to buy it... Don't let these scammers get away with such nonsense.

[-] flauschke@kbin.melroy.org 4 points 10 months ago

Everybody will automatically refunded

[-] LunchEnjoyer@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Was not aware, that's great

[-] B0NK3RS@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

Nobody should be surprised and everyone who bought this shit should honestly be thankful they are getting their money back.

[-] blazera@kbin.social 11 points 11 months ago

Howd this game get so much attention in the first place? Theres so many fraudulent mobile games flooding app stores every single day.

[-] Lanusensei87@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Well, for one, they probably used bots to garner the "Most Wishlisted Game on Steam" accolade, they also used shill accounts to counter negative reviews and press.

[-] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 3 points 10 months ago

Thats just blind guessing.

People just liked the concept pitch, its not an entire smoke and mirror show.

[-] mrfriki@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

Well, that’s 43 days longer than I expected.

[-] JackDark@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

I thought it wasn't an MMO? Why does it require servers?

[-] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

You know that extraction shooters still require servers to host the people that are in a match, right? MMO's aren't the only genre that use servers.

[-] momocchi@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

Its still online just 32 people per server

[-] Tarkcanis@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

It's an MO game they just lied about the massively bit.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago

In a way it's great that people get their money back, in another way maybe people would learn to not believe the hype if they didn't...

[-] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 10 months ago

Skill Up had a very good video describing the whole history of this debacle.

[-] ekZepp@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago
this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2023
287 points (98.3% liked)

Games

32540 readers
623 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS