155
submitted 1 year ago by lntl@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

Get those construction contacts signed!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And Hinkley Point was such a roaring success, let's pour more money down the bottomless barrel!

[-] Ooops@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

It's an obvious distraction pushing the topic of nuclear power again, just days after they prepared to open massive new oil and gas production sites while stifling the well-going UK wind industry.

But there are enough people out there brain-washed by decades of anti-renewable propaganda that it will work. And in the end we have just another country failing to build the proper amount of nuclear base load AND the proper amount of renewables... but at least someone smart "thought ahead" and worked for enough fossil fuels to compensate.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

The conservatives just operate on the assumption that everybody else doesn't have a clue what's going on because they don't.

I bet they were told that the nuclear commission were going to open another power plant and just ignored them and gave out the oil drilling contracts anyway.

[-] lntl@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Burning coal is cheap, that's why we're here. I'll pay more for electric today to leave a planet for our children. Wish my parents did that for me.

Only a fool would consider the cost in dollars alone.

[-] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Only a fool would advocate for paying way more for nuclear when renewables + storage are substantially cheaper.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] jabjoe@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

Actually coal energy is expensive. Renewable energy is cheap energy.

[-] Ooops@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Nope, burning coal was cheap a long time ago and allowed the people to accululate enough wealth to push for more coal (and brain-wash people to believe coal is cheap; and also how expensive renewables are). Just like the nuclear producers did decades ago to tell the tale of how there's no alternative to nuclear.

The actual reality looks like this. And if you think that you need to pay more for electricity to not destroy the planet that's already their propaganda having done their work.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Wirrvogel@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Also it works so flawlessly for the French (not*), why not do it too?

*France is slowly overcoming stress-corrosion problems (35 out of 56 reactors were down, drought is another problem), and Finland celebrates the commissioning of a new reactor (albeit 14 years late), while on the other hand monthly German nuclear generation will be zero for the first time in over 50 years.

[-] Meowoem@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago

The real thing is the cost, the cost per kWh is falling so going nuke and locking in to a price that's already above market makes no sense at all.

The Tories are ideologically opposed to renewables because of some weird culture war thing, plus they hate the idea of locally sustainable communities not being totally under the control of billionaires - people are a lot easier to scare into obedience when you can tell them their power might be shut off. The main reason though is huge projects can only go to huge companies, they don't want lots of little solar farms they want their oil baron buddies to maintain their monopolies, that's the only reason we still hear so much about this now allbut obsolete technology.

[-] Wirrvogel@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

I totally agree and it is the same for Germany. That's why especially wind energy for South Germany was held back for so long, how dare communities go energy independent. It seems the resistance there is broken now, at least I hope it is and not just an election promise that gets broken after the Bavarian election.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Ya know, wind and solar are independent too, and much cheaper.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2023
155 points (94.8% liked)

World News

32317 readers
551 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS