241
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

The Supreme Court on Friday rejected a request by special counsel Jack Smith to fast-track arguments on whether Donald Trump has any immunity from federal prosecution for alleged crimes he committed while in office – a move that will likely delay his trial.

The court did not explain its reasoning and there were no noted dissents.

The court’s decision is a major blow to Smith, who made an extraordinary gamble when he asked the justices to take the rare step of skipping a federal appeals court and quickly deciding a fundamental issue in his election subversion criminal case against Trump.

Both sides will still have the option of appealing an eventual ruling by the DC Circuit Court of Appeals up to the high court, but the court’s move is a major victory for Trump, whose strategy of delay in the criminal case included mounting a protracted fight over the immunity question, which must be settled before his case goes to trial.

top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Cuttlefish1111@lemmy.world 111 points 11 months ago

They don’t even feel the need to explain themselves either. We truly need a revolution, French style, to fix this situation. It won’t happen until the grocery stores are empty

[-] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 32 points 11 months ago

Or until the porn gets shut off.

[-] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 18 points 11 months ago

The amount of Republicans that would go on killing spree because they don't have their porn would be insane. Better they can't eat than denying them hypocrisy.

[-] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Especially the repressed, projecting Republicans that need their porn to get off on their LGBT stuff

[-] blargerer@kbin.social -2 points 11 months ago

Given there were no dissents, its likely above board.

[-] PugJesus@kbin.social 19 points 11 months ago

All of the court ascribes to "We don't want to look political despite being very political", and this is a cheap win in that area for them. 'Above board' is a strong term.

[-] ook_the_librarian@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

There were no noted descents. This wasn't a ruling. We don't have 9 voices. It means that less than 4 justices wanted to take the case. It's rare any desents in this type of decision would be public.

[-] Rusticus@lemmy.world 73 points 11 months ago

Fortunately the Colorado Supreme Court gave the SCOTUS a deadline of Jan 5 to rule or STFU. This will go a long way towards determining whether we continue to have somewhat of a democratic-ish country or we run full steam into fascism.

[-] transmatrix@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I don’t think that’s how they worded it. The stay holds if the Supreme Court picks it up. That means that all they have to do is not rule on it and he still gets put on the ballot because of the stay.

ETA: https://www.vox.com/scotus/2023/12/20/24009521/supreme-court-donald-trump-colorado-ballot-insurrection-fourteenth-amendment-anderson-griswold

And it also ruled that this “stay shall remain in place” if Trump or another litigant seeks US Supreme Court review of this case prior to January 4.

[-] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 37 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I'm reading this as Biden should just start locking the traitors up, due process be damned. Firing squads on fifth avenue. If a president can't be tried while they're sitting, and they can't be tried after they leave, none of it matters and I see no problems here. That sound right, SCOTUS?

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago

The rightwingnuts already accuse him of similar crimes.

[-] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 11 months ago

This is why I never feel bad about taking government aid to which I am entitled.

After all, republicans already say I, and those like me, are taking it (despite the fact that red states receive far far far more aid than blue), so I might as well just use it and actually benefit from the programs, since the negative perception exists whether I do or not.

Maybe this is the same…🤔🧐

[-] AnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 11 months ago

The court’s decision is a major blow to Smith, who made an extraordinary gamble when he asked the justices to take the rare step of skipping a federal appeals court and quickly deciding a fundamental issue in his election subversion criminal case against Trump.

It doesn't sound like this is a surprise.

[-] bedrooms@kbin.social 15 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

a major victory for Trump, whose strategy of delay in the criminal case included mounting a protracted fight over the immunity question

Yes, but it also means that Trump successfully used his bad-faith delay tactics.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago
[-] ExLisper@linux.community 9 points 11 months ago

A rapist, a sect member and a sexual harasser deciding if another rapist can be a judge. What could go wrong?

[-] PugJesus@kbin.social 5 points 11 months ago

Of fucking course.

this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2023
241 points (96.5% liked)

News

23360 readers
1700 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS