85
submitted 2 years ago by FlyingSquid@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Technically donkey skin. Used in health supplements. And I just don't know anymore...

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TubeTalkerX@kbin.social 14 points 2 years ago

And here I thought I was living in America, Land of the Free!!!

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

What about the freedom of donkeys to have skin? I'm pretty sure that's somewhere in the Constitution.

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 3 points 2 years ago

Maybe the Jackass Constitution.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Maybe it's because the symbol of the Democrats is a donkey and Democrats run California and if they get skinned, Republicans will take over because the Democrats will all be dead and put into herbal health products on Amazon.

In which case, I support Gavin Newsom and his plan to save the California Democrats from being flayed and used in bogus health products.

[-] NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

Because they are always rushing’ around!

[-] Rambomst@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

This isn't a product I am looking for but why is this an issue when other animal based products are being sold? Cow products fine but donkey products aren't?

I see there is a specific horse related law but why.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

I'm more concerned about this being touted as a health product, especial an "herbal" one. Because there's no evidence that it improves health and donkey skin isn't an herb.

But really I just posted it because I thought it was an interesting story.

[-] Rambomst@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Yeah, I just glazed over that part, there are so many "health" products that are complete bunk on Amazon.

[-] osarusan@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

there are so many “health” products that are complete bunk

FTFY

[-] Rambomst@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Thanks, my mistake

[-] iiGxC@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 years ago

Speciesists gonna discriminate arbitrarily, that's kinda the whole deal with speciesism 🤷

[-] speff@disc.0x-ia.moe 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

This 2007 document seems to do a pretty good job at going over the motivations when the law was made. It's a bit longer to read than I have time for right now, but it seems like it's worth the time judging by the intro and background

[-] Tremble@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 years ago

That’s okay I started harvesting my own

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

It just tastes better that way.

[-] Nerd02@lemmy.basedcount.com 2 points 2 years ago

My takeaway from this article is that, as it turns out, California has laws banning the consumption of equine meat. Man, what the hell? Horse is delicious and donkey is arguably even better. How is that any different than eating beef, sheep and so on?

this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2023
85 points (91.3% liked)

News

37770 readers
454 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS