"He added that South Africa was complicit in Hamas' crimes against Israelis, without elaborating."
Idiot. Without elaborating.
On the plus side, Netanyahu 's government still doesn't understand that this stopped working a while ago
They don't believe the accusations they're making, they're just counting on 80 year old world leaders like Biden still falling for it.
Sadly, it seems to be working.
Now it's on citizens to try and hold their elected officials accountable.
Unfortunately Americans don't get much say in it due to the two party system. Regardless of who wins, the winner is going to support Israels genocide.
Which is going to depress turnout, and that helps Republicans become presidents more than anything else.
Biden would rather support genocide than prevent trump from taking office.
So it stopped working a while ago but sadly it seems to be working?
An unrelated paper, but this can still be used to estimate how old are world leaders now:
So this statement may be correct, e.g. if we draw a line at 60 and all the leaders that are older fall for it while all the younger don't, it will be more than half of the leaders that fall for it.
But really, I'd rather see the median age of state governments of countries, because nothing is usually decided by a leader alone.
And it’s up to people to vote, but voting doesn’t work because two party system.
“no u” -Israel
Same as Trump. Or debates on Fox News. Classic angry right-wing yelling lol.
"We assure South Africa's leaders, history will judge you, and it will judge you without mercy," he added.
Oh the irony
They intend on writing history, it's meant to be a threat.
If you don't support Genocide against the Palestinians you're basically Hamas already.
Every accusation is an admission.
Wow, something to be said for someone with such a hateful response to an accusation, almost as if they're trying to prevent discussion by labelling any potential questioning of tactics as racist to be "judged harshly by the world". Gaslighting and projecting on full display here.
The tactics lose power when you see and understand them. Spread knowledge.
Not almost. Netanyahu has spent the last two decades getting a definition of Anti-Semitism that includes criticism of the government of Israel put in place all over the world. He's been depressingly successful. There's artists and academics losing government funding just for criticizing the Israeli government in social media.
Zionists are the new Nazis.
They don't argue in good-faith and they know it.
"We assure South Africa's leaders, history will judge you, and it will judge you without mercy," he added.
Starting the defense with a menace ... anyway, let's see who is judged by history first
The good thing about the history judgement is, it doesn't matter much how they dance around laws technicalities and definitions of words.
"The State of Israel will appear before the International Court of Justice at The Hague to dispel South Africa's absurd blood libel," spokesman Eylon Levy told an online briefing.
This guy's response is antisemitism buzzword bingo.
Like, seriously, blood libel?
I haven't read the legal documents, but I'm going to go out on a limb and assume they don't mention Israel poisoning Palestinian genes with interbreeding.
I chuckled but blood libel has a specific meaning. Throughout history there was a nasty lie that kept getting brought back. It accused Jews of commiting blood sacrifices of Christians. Most recently by Nazis.
So he is putting any accusation of war crimes on the same level as Nazi propaganda about Jews.
When South Africa accuses you of genocide, you know you fucked up.
What I don't get is, from all the countries that could have done this (i.e. accuse Israel of genocide in The Hague), why South Africa? Am I out of the loop? Is there a reason they came forward?
Like, I see the irony with genocide and apartheid and so on, I just wonder why South Africa even cares this much about Gaza/Israel (I mean we all do, but no one did what they did, not even Turkey).
A. The ANC really needs some good press.
B. They're fairly independent in the global stage but lean towards Russia/China/India. So they may be doing this partially to egg the US' face.
C. They have personal experience with Apartheid.
How come?
He means Apartheid
That one went so far that south Africa is the only country to voluntarily unilateraly give up its nuclear arsenal when a minority risked getting to power
The marginalised and persecuted majority*
Though I'm fucking glad they disarmed, I wouldn't trust the ANC to find it's way out of a glass room covered with doors, never mind look after nukes. It's bad enough the state power utility has a nuclear reactor.
Who were the minority?
Yeah, it's actually backwards. The minority was in power and was at risk of losing it.
Oh no the white Afrikaaners did lose power. The ANC came to power in 1994. The other commentators post doesn't make sense for that reason.
South Africa used to be an apartheid state so if they're callling you out...
The more Israel speaks, the deeper the hole gets.
“…but they’re God’s chosen people! surely they would never…”
Jews maybe. But if Israelies specifically are Gods chosen people then god fucked up.
If this fails to have any effect, I wonder how many more local wars will be started soon on the ground of international law becoming some kind of joke as of lately
Isn't that how WW2 started? Germany basically broke the Versailles Treaty and kept getting away with it so just kept going.
Warfare's back in style, just in time for the climate to really start straining resources.
Israel to The Hague: "Nuh-uh."
Israel is going to blame the US for enabling them
Presumably the US will agree, given that's the line they take with Israel historically.
Tell me you're a terrorist without telling me you're a terrorist.
If in the next few weeks you hear of an agreement between Germany and Israel to allow the IDF use of an airforce base within reach of The Hague, it will have to do with this.
an agreement between Germany and Israel to allow… use of an air force base within reach of The Hague.
absolutely wild timeline.
"they're coming right for us, Ned!"
-Israel, probably
*in The Hague
It's likely shortened from "At The Hague court", so it works.
I'm highly doubtful they would send an official representative to the Hague Court. Even sending somebody to say you're wrong, implicitly acknowledges the court has jurisdiction over you.
A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/