168
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by PugJesus@kbin.social to c/historyporn@lemmy.world
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Maruki_Hurakami@lemm.ee 23 points 10 months ago

This picture really puts in perspective just how big these were.

[-] PugJesus@kbin.social 10 points 10 months ago

Right? I always think of submarines as small and cramped, and while they are certainly cramped, they're not generally small. Lot of machinery goes into those beasts.

[-] Maruki_Hurakami@lemm.ee 6 points 10 months ago

I might be misremembering, but I thought U-boats were known for speed and maneuverability. So I thought they'd be smaller for sure.

[-] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Not really that U-boat had a surface speed of 14kn and a submerged speed of 7km. Think of them more of ambush than quick strike.

[-] Maruki_Hurakami@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

That makes sense! Thanks for clarifying that.

[-] Redredme@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Are. Still.

[-] ganksy@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

I feel completely ignorant that I was not aware U-boats were around during WW1

[-] PugJesus@kbin.social 22 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Unrestricted submarine warfare was actually one of the causes that drew the US into WW1!

Continent-wide war over the future of civilization? We sleep

You sink our money-making ships? REAL SHIT

[-] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

They were the reason for Dazel camo that was seen on WW1 ships.

[-] niktemadur@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

One of the key events that gave the United States the politically-charged push into the war was the sinking of the Lusitania, and it was done by a German u-boat.

Here's another weird one you didn't expect: Germans used zeppelins to bomb London.

[-] AnalogJack@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago
[-] PugJesus@kbin.social 6 points 10 months ago

Corrected, thanks!

[-] Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net 5 points 10 months ago

You can't park that thing there!

[-] TubeTalkerX@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago
[-] TubeTalkerX@kbin.social 5 points 10 months ago

Too bad they couldn’t put it in a museum

[-] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Calm down, Dr. Jones.

[-] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 months ago

Im surprised the tech for submarines existed as far back as 1919

[-] Forester@yiffit.net 6 points 10 months ago

The first viable war submarine was used in the 1700s.

this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2024
168 points (100.0% liked)

HistoryPorn

4865 readers
212 users here now

If you would like to become a mod in this community, kindly PM the mod.

Relive the Past in Jaw-Dropping Detail!

HistoryPorn is for photographs (or, if it can be found, film) of the past, recent or distant! Give us a little snapshot of history!

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.
  9. No genocide or atrocity denialism.

Pictures of old artifacts and museum pieces should go to History Artifacts

Illustrations and paintings should go to History Drawings

Related Communities:

Military Porn

Forgotten Weapons

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS