1005
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 68 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[-] db2@lemmy.world 31 points 10 months ago

GPT you mean. Linux can boot in a non-EFI machine that has GPT disk partitions.. Windows can't because it's dumb.

[-] Max_P@lemmy.max-p.me 33 points 10 months ago

Yes but by doing so you're using the same principles as MBR boot. There's still this coveted boot sector Windows will attempt to take back every time.

What's nice about EFI in particular is that the motherboard loads the file from the ESP, and can load multiple of them and add them to its boot menu. Depending on the motherboard, even browse the ESP and manually go execute a .efi from it.

Which in turn makes it a lot less likely to have bootloader fuckups because you basically press F12 and pick GRUB/sd-boot and you're back in. Previously the only fix would be boot USB and reinstall syslinux/GRUB.

[-] taladar@sh.itjust.works 10 points 10 months ago

I just had a bug on both of my EFI computers where they wouldn't boot any more and a grub-install fixed it, apparently the regular update processes do not update the version on the ESP for some reason and my assumption is that it became incompatible with the modules in /boot

Adding an EFI Boot Entry for netboot.xyz after it happened on the first one really helped fix the second one though.

[-] frokie@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago

I’m not having an AI boot my computer!

[-] droans@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

GPT is a partitioning table. EFI is a bootloader firmware interface.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 10 months ago

No I mean EFI. It is a much simpler than MBR.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] pryre@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago

Start using and efistub and never worry about boot loaders again!

[-] vox@sopuli.xyz 32 points 10 months ago

systemd-boot is a reasonable compromise. i like it

[-] pryre@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

The reality is that a bootloader will seemingly always be needed to account for difficult BIOS' and legacy setups (I'm looking at you, dual-booted Ubuntu 20.04).

[-] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 7 points 10 months ago

Naah I just disable secure boot altogether, then you don't have to worry about all that TPM security theatre.

[-] Vash63@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago

You don't need secure boot to use EFI. It's better all around regardless of SB.

[-] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 months ago

Fair enough I don't miss the old BIOS.

[-] 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yeah, but Windows 11 needs it.

Can be disabled though. Easiest way - use Rufus when burning the USB.

Fun fact, you can also install Win11 in MBR mode, no UEFI needed whatsoever.

[-] Crack0n7uesday@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

Do we really ever fix the bootstrap, or does the bootstrap fix us?

[-] krnl386@lemmy.ca 16 points 10 months ago

Ah yes, simplicity. MBR, with all its limitations had one killer feature: it was extremely simple.

UEFI, as powerful as it is, is the opposite of simple. Many moving parts, so many potential failure points. Unfortunately, it seems like modern software is just that: more complex and prone to failure.

[-] 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 months ago

Exactly why old devices are so hard to break - they're incredibly simple.

To be honest, I see nothing wrong with MBR boot, it does the job, I'll use it till I can or till it doesn't do the job I want/need.

[-] rab@lemmy.ca 6 points 10 months ago

I work in IT for many years and I think your last sentence is very true. And is also why the industry is so lucrative haha

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] zaart@lemmy.tedomum.net 15 points 10 months ago

I once fucked up my grub.cfg, wrote over the part needed to unencrypt. Had no idea what had happened. Was a fun night :)

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 14 points 10 months ago

Was upgrading Devuan and something happened with grub-update, could be my btrfs subvol setup?

Anyway a rescue boot, chroot and grub-update later, and it's running great again.

[-] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

Nuke the boot loader and burn your compiled code directly onto the bare metal the way the designers intended.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] prettydarknwild@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

i prefer EFI, MBR breaks easily and dual booting with it is horrible

[-] 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I have litelarly never broken MBR boot while dual booting and I have done it for at least a decade now. Windows updates and everything, not once has MBR boot been broken for me.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Classy@sh.itjust.works 8 points 10 months ago

I've been struggling with the boot loader for four days now and now my laptop boot loops and I can't even access my primary OS (still windows) and can only access Ubuntu via flash drive. So yeah this meme is too fucking on.

[-] 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago

Chroot into the main Ubuntu partition from the live USB and update GRUB.

[-] WalJT@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Honestly can't remember the last time I had a bootoader issue. Don't get me wrong, I've broken plenty of other things.

[-] themelm@sh.itjust.works 12 points 10 months ago

Windows 7 used to thunderfuck grub at random every few updates just to keep everyone on their toes.

[-] flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 months ago

Nice new verb you got there. Thunderfuck, indeed!

[-] okamiueru@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Did it stop after W7? I feel like it still does this at every opportunity, be that W10 or W11

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] onlinepersona@programming.dev 7 points 10 months ago

MBR is so easy to understand. UEFI, has so many things to understand EFI, ESP, MOK, signing procedures and signing chains, ... it's just so darn complicated.

[-] cley_faye@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago
  • Disable secureboot
  • Things just work

And in the end you just remove the need for a physical attacker to use whatever vulnerability there is in your EFI implementation anyway.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] wooki@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I cant be the only person who noticed the Arch user dating a fury!?

I wouldnt go to bed either…oh yes “bootloader”.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] spez@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 months ago

Can't relate to be honest, I have a life and use Fedora

[-] not_again@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

I feel this.

Although my last bootloader is adventure was pretty easy...installed a completely separate drive for Linux and wanted to boot off of that drive (sdb). A bug in the Linux mint installer put the bootloader on my the windows drive instead (sda).

Was fairly straightforward to switch over though (change in fstab then installing grub). I use the bios boot selector (F11) for me to select either the win loader or my Linux mint efi.

Am switching over to Linux as primary driver. So tired of nags, ads, "switch to Edge", long updates, etc. love being able to ssh+x onto that (relatively beefy) box from my laptop and run ides and such.

[-] SameOldInternet@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Started using UEFI booting with secure boot. Much easier to fix and work with.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2024
1005 points (97.7% liked)

linuxmemes

21281 readers
240 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS