34
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Flaky@iusearchlinux.fyi 7 points 10 months ago

I'm skeptical on whether this will be a hit with the audience, but at least they're releasing something I guess. I remember when Microsoft announced HoloLens, which then fizzled out.

[-] alecto@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

I’m pretty excited to see unfiltered reviews of this thing. It will be really interesting to see what apps get released and how people actually end up using it.

[-] Fades@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

I can’t afford it but I am so excited for it to hit the market and hopefully spur competition and usher in more innovation and lower price options.

The tech looks really promising

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

There is too much wasted wealth in this world. An AR headset is a great idea. Not at that price. Anyone who is spending that much on a first-generation AR device is too rich.

[-] thehatfox@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago

It's a big ask for an unproven platform. But then the same could be said for the original Mac, which launched in 1984 at $2500, which would be $7000+ today.

I suppose the question is will Vision Pro be the next Mac or the next Lisa.

[-] HollandJim@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago

Like the Mac or the iPhone, you can’t tell until you start using it.

Never forget how much everyone balked at the phone because it didn’t have buttons or that it was too expensive. And then they used it.

[-] thehatfox@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

The iPhone was a still more natural progression from previous mobile phones people already owned and understood though.

There's no precedent at all for using a headset for most people however, so it's much harder sell to get them to take the leap.

[-] HollandJim@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

There are plenty of headsets out there already, and by “most people” can I assume “not gamers”? Headsets are in use for most people and architectural work or design or gaming… Just not for people in general. It’s a niche.

The only reason for that is that there designs are based upon WHO they think their public IS and what they think the public can afford to buy. Their market defines the product, not the other way around.

But like the iPhone, Vision is going to redefine what you can do with a headset, and in that it will redefine who the market CAN BE.

When the price comes down enough maybe it will be for everybody, but for now, it will still be in niche item. It’s just that you’re gonna get a look at what a real headset can do, and I look forward to having my mind blown.

[-] DAlpha@mastodon.social 1 points 10 months ago

@HollandJim @thehatfox perhaps I’m old, but when people say headset I automatically think over ear headphones. Are you talking VR or AR?

[-] HollandJim@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

@DAlpha - I’m not sure it matters these days. Apple Vision is both.

Edit: Am way old too, and yet I want to try it out badly.

[-] Petter1@lemm.ee 11 points 10 months ago

I think it’s that expensive, because it is really hard to mass produce and so they want to reduce number of sales needed while still get the project costs back. If there one thing that apple has mastered, it is the calculation of expected number of sales depending on price. They will adjust margin accordingly and will never gift you anything. That is why the price is so high, they know there will be few buyer, but those who buy whatever they ask.

[-] garretble@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

And also just 256GB of storage at that price.

They want you flying on a plane watching a bunch of movies or playing a bunch of games and give you 256GB.

[-] RotaryKeyboard@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 10 months ago

Don’t forget spatial video. A minute of spatial video is approximately 130MB. 256 GB is going to fill up fast.

[-] bamboo@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

Just have an external hard drive hanging off your face, duh!

[-] RotaryKeyboard@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 10 months ago

Readers will be available for $99

Has anyone here used a different VR headeset who also needs reading glasses? I use readers (I had laser eye surgery, which made me need reading glasses much earlier than usual). I tried the Meta Quest 3 over the holidays and was surprised to discover that I didn’t need reading glasses to see things “up close.”

[-] Grass@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago

Is Apple's most yeah right price to date?

[-] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago

The pricing is insanely aggressive for the tech in it.

[-] FurtiveFugitive@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

I would argue there's a lot of cool, new, tech in this headset to justify some of the price premium. Not $3500 but certainly some of it.

The most ridiculous Apple tax is still either with the$1000 pro stand for the monitor. Or the Apple Mac Pro wheels at $700.

[-] Grass@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

Oh yeah I forgot about those...

this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2024
34 points (87.0% liked)

Apple

17484 readers
34 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS