672
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 116 points 8 months ago

While I didn't think that they would go after a dictionary, it's not surprising that fascists would go after a book full of definitions.

[-] Dreadnaught@sh.itjust.works 65 points 8 months ago

After reading a little bit, it's not that they banned dictionaries, but it seems the district got ahead of the curve. The law itself is the problem

[-] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 52 points 8 months ago

That's why they have an overly broad definition of what is prohibited. So they can pick and choose what they will allow.

[-] orclev@lemmy.world 72 points 8 months ago

In this case I think the district is doing this in protest. The legislators intended to pick and choose, but the district is applying it as written, so Dictionaries are out. They're highlighting how absurd the law is.

[-] CobblerScholar@lemmy.world 38 points 8 months ago

That was my impression, similar move to schools banning the Bible citing all the beastiality, rape and mass murder in there

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 14 points 8 months ago

They have already stated they want "their people" to be the deciders. It’s just textbook fascism.

load more comments (1 replies)

Check this bit from the end:

In a brief submitted by the State of Florida in support of Escambia, Attorney General Ashley Moody argued that the school board could ban books for any reason because the purpose of public school libraries is to "convey the government’s message," and that can be accomplished through "the removal of speech that the government disapproves."

[-] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 24 points 8 months ago

What in the absolute fuck?

[-] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com 10 points 8 months ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] catch22@startrek.website 15 points 8 months ago

They keep sayin' we're free, but we're all just loose.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Facebones@reddthat.com 9 points 8 months ago

The party of small govt (except for pushing christofascism)

[-] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

Ashley Moody is a fascist traitor

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 79 points 8 months ago

I'm not surprised. I haven't read the dictionary but people tell me it talks all about what homosexuals are and what transgender means and it actually defines the word 'lesbian!'

[-] A_cook_not_a_chef@lemmy.world 23 points 8 months ago

I hear it even defines "woke"!

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 8 months ago

It has all the banned things!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] medicsofanarchy@lemmy.world 60 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I hope they've alerted their groundskeepers that all trees, shrubs, bushes, and flowers must be mowed over, because pollen and flowers are Nature's pole-dancers and sluts. Not sure if they can have grass.

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 32 points 8 months ago

Grass is a euphemism for marijuana so they can't have that or it will give kids ideas

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 57 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Parents NEED to lodge formal complaints with the police and school boards in EVERY district that still has dictionaries and encyclopedias in the libraries.

Whittle down every district until they're only allowed to work on coloring books for every grade K-12, or as close as they can get.

Don't forget to target private schools with massive social media campaigns to inform all parents that dictionaries = grooming. If the private schools refuse to respond, convince the dumber wealthy parents to pull their kids and put them into a safe school, without books.

[-] j4k3@lemmy.world 27 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Conservative = Stupid

Coloring books in place of books is exactly how you grow the Republican voter base.

Mindless exploitable industrial scale human production is the end game of the Republican army of the Oligarchy. It's industrial cattle, but humans; eat garbage, consume everything you're told, ask no questions, and barely survive. If anything bad happens, use your gun to take yourself out and/or whatever other farm stock you feel oppressed and frustrated with inside your little pin.

[-] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Even if what you're saying is true, and I'm not going to take a position either way, it doesn't have any bearing on my suggestion.

DeSantis is a reply guy with power. This bill wasn't passed because a majority of FL voters want it, not even a majority of his voters. This bill, like many others, was simply him trying to ride the culture war to the White House, but it failed. The only thing keeping it in place in inertia and the desire to save face. That only changes if the political calculus changes.

I guarantee you that if these book bans were exploited to force the closure of ALL public school libraries, remove dictionaries and encyclopedias from all classrooms, and basically made to significantly impact ALL FL parents, or even just the wealthier areas, the public outcry from parents would be enough to reverse it.

[-] jzzvid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 8 months ago

Exactly, parents will care when their children who received a Florida education are not competitive enough to compete in a capitalist environment. They'll realize this soon enough when their children haven't learned anything in school aside from propaganda.

Let them sacrifice their own children to Mammon. It is what they said they wanted, after all. Maybe this will be the wake up call they finally need. They wanted to "stop woke" and didn't realize it meant "stay asleep, plebs."

As someone who train-hooped out of Florida years ago, I fucking warned y'all and now it's happening. I knew this was the trajectory when Jeb Bush got elected in the 1990s and I was in middle school at the time!

I think when parents realize DeSantis just sentenced their kids to fighting to be menial wage slaves for the local corrupt petty bourgeois of every little shithole county while they have to attempt to convince professionals to move to their state they will regret all this and unfortunately the only way they will ever learn is by once again screwing themselves.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] 000@fuck.markets 18 points 8 months ago

But that's their goal, they want kids to be stupid so they'll vote republican when they grow up.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 53 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

because it exposes students to "alternate sexual ideologies." Baggett said she was concerned "a second grader would read this book, and that idea would pop into the second grader's mind… that these are two people of the same sex that love each other."

This is the kind of people we are dealing with. They are literally trying to prevent children from developing accepting attitudes towards minorities. That is their stated goal. It's not often I read such blatant disgusting hatred coming from a teacher. The book she was referencing was And Tango makes three. Which is unbelievable in the context of her statement. Were the penguins, who were real actual penguins, somehow a part of an "alternate sexual ideology"? How badly rotten does your brain have to be to think "sexual ideology" when you see 2 penguins raising a baby together?

[-] slurpeesoforion@startrek.website 16 points 8 months ago

You see, tolerance is a slippery slope. First you tolerate the Irish. Next thing you know Italians are semi-ok. Then Polish?! Eventually Catholics and Jews are acceptable. So long as none of these marry across lines.

/s

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 45 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

That book defines "racism" and "slavery" and may contain examples. Conservatives definitely don't want white kids finding out their ancestors may have been conservatives.

[-] Witchfire@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago

Ancestors? I don't think you have to go that far back

[-] BlitzFitz@lemmy.world 33 points 8 months ago

Is no one else looking at this line the school district is at this point just pulling every possible book that could match the description of the law in purpose to make a point?

One teacher made a complaint about a couple of books so they said fine, well just remove everything else that this bill could possibly touch. Just to prove how ambiguous and far stretching this law can go?

Of course they shouldn't pull a dictionary but it matches the description. This is to test the law.

[-] piecat@lemmy.world 32 points 8 months ago

Pulling the dictionary accomplishes what they want: a dumber future generation.

Pull the Bible, that's what riles them up

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Jaysyn@kbin.social 31 points 8 months ago

/m/MaliciousCompliance is leaking :D

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

I don't think this was malicious in any way, just covering their asses since they have a fascist state government.

[-] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 25 points 8 months ago

Fantastic. Now those pesky kids won’t know what fascism means.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 16 points 8 months ago

Pesky Kid: I looked up the word "fascist" on my parent's phone, and it showed a picture of Ron DeSantis. Weirdly, it does the same when you lookup "dumbass..."

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 24 points 8 months ago

HB 1069 gives residents the right to demand the removal of any library book that "depicts or describes sexual conduct," as defined under Florida law, whether or not the book is pornographic.

I was going to ask how their bible gets around this, but then I found several instances of its removal in Florida.

These librarians. I like them. Assuming they're doing this as a statement.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago

Not sure I trust a librarian that writes "indefinately"

[-] ook_the_librarian@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

Cut the librarian some slack, they just had their dictionary banned. (I wish I were joking.)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] charonn0@startrek.website 18 points 8 months ago

The reality in Escambia County serves as a rejoinder to DeSantis, who has described concerns about book removals as a "leftist activist hoax" and a "false political narrative."

If Floridians had a dictionary to look up "rejoinder" with, they'd be very upset.

[-] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 17 points 8 months ago

Soon: "All books are now banned because they contain the letters L, G, B, T and Q. Any books containing these five letters will now be banned from public libraries."

[-] ray@kbin.social 7 points 8 months ago

Ernest Vincent Wright: "Hold my beer"

[-] PRUSSIA_x86@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)
[-] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago

Guess they got tired tired of hearing "words have meanings" in response to their mindless rambling.

[-] febra@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago
[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago

I thought this was an Onion article when I saw the title.

I wish I was right.

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 12 points 8 months ago

We should also ban math books, and history books. Full of sexual descriptions and imagery. Ban economy books too, full baabout advice on how to rape the poor, and the bible too with its incest and rape stories, and you know, let's ban all the books and then just go to school to hold hands and sing hallelujah and praise Jesus.

I see a number of Republican politicians getting very wet at this idea...

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] MeanEYE@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

They did keep guns though. Those are more important.

[-] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

DeSantis has a stranglehold on people here in FL because he kept stuff open during Covid. So people mindlessly co-sign everything he does and Dems pretty much have given up here. They are going after all forms of education and history they don't agree with.

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 7 points 8 months ago

With rights to request removal of books when they have descriptions of sexual activity, I'd say the bible is definitely a prime target. It has incest, rape, and even those are kind of fan favorites for republican politicians, they too must recognize that Bible's are evil and must be banned.

[-] batmaniam@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

lol to the bit about Atlas Shrugged. Although yeah there are a few passages in there that are basically erotica, forgot about that. It's been a long time but I remember them being "NC-17" not "R" rated.

(usual thing I have to say here about this book here: I'm aware it's badly written and terrible as philosophy excersize, I just liked my steam-punk sci-fi with trains)

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2024
672 points (99.0% liked)

politics

18894 readers
3232 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS