Toward the end of the hearing, Moskowitz pointed out that if the issue is that Biden won’t testify, it could be easily resolved then and there. After all, Biden was at the hearing.
But when Moskowitz asked for a show of hands from people who wanted to hear Biden’s testimony, almost no Republicans raised their hand.
"We want you to testify, but not like that!"
Every challenger of every one of those Republicans should be showing that footage in their campaign ads. They are admitting they just want to fool the American people.
And before that, one of the Democrats (I forget which one) pointed out that the chair of the committee said that Hunter could choose to testify in public or private as long as he testified. Hunter chose in public. The chair disputed this and the Democratic Representative said "I really don't want to play the video, but I have your exact words here."
The guy was trying to change the offer after the fact from "public or private, your choice" to "you can testify publicly, but only after you testify in private."
What are Republicans scared of that they don't want Hunter to testify in public? Of course, we all know the answer. They're afraid that their imagined giant conspiracy theory will be revealed to be based on nothing. (Well, revealed even more than it currently is.) They're also afraid that they can't misquote Hunter if his actual quotes are on public video. It's a lot easier to say "Hunter replied 'my dad used his influence to get me a job'" when there's no video showing that his answer was actually "at no point did my dad use his influence to get me a job."
In the past, she's displayed pornography. Are pornographic photos allowed to be displayed in this room?
— Rep. Jamie Raskin (MD-8) Objecting to Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (GA-14) entering items into the record.
It's not pornography.
— Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (GA-14)
Oh okay well you're the expert.
— Rep. Jamie Raskin (MD-8)
That part, I was done. I just couldn't seriously watch it any longer. That whole thing from start to that point was a complete shit show.
I mean, like, how much porn can one really watch any way?
That’s not a good question to pose to the internet.
BRB, gonna watch all of it
I woulda thought Looney Boobert would be the porn expert
This one made me laugh way too hard. Jesus Christ.
Mace: You're the epitome of white privilege, coming into the oversight committee, spitting in our face, You have no balls to come up here and --
Moskowitz: We can hear from Hunter Biden right now
Mace: Are women allowed to speak?!? Hunter Biden should be arrested right here
But this one made me wake up my family from howling.
When You Elect MAGA Clowns, You Get a MAGA Circus.
Look at the two gross people in that photo. 🤢
I have trouble finding humor in and laughing at the signs of our fall from democracy. But this had me in stitches
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News