280
Legal organ trafficking, because why the fuck not?
deleted by creator
Well, Buck v. Bell was never overturned, so the US government still has the right to sterilize citizens without consent. So I'm not sure this is much of a leap.
deleted by creator
Respect the dead but not the living until we make them dead.
Their argument is that the harvesting WAS with consent
deleted by creator
There's also some Black Mirror-esque things they could be trying.
Shit, I watched a Polish movie with exactly this theme
https://m.imdb.com/title/tt2627146/
Highly recommend
I'm looking forward to Alabama's argument that a woman doesn't have a right to control her fetus, therefor an inmate doesn't have a right to control their organs.
Lot of profit in selling body parts
The family wasn't convicted of a crime. Even if they were, this is not how we punish or rehabilitate people.
Well they weren't gonna eat the organs. Can't let that all go to waste.
Sweet home Alabama
What the fuck
Why take the brain? That can't be trafficked.
Perhaps as an anatomical specimen for study? There’s a market for that. It’s usually where someone ends up when they legitimately donate their body to ‘science’.
I saw they found the brain:
Nah that's Abby Normal. Says it right on the label.
I read it as the warning is directed at Abby.
Do not use this brain, ABBY
That little shit.
Legitimate uses of brains often aren't relying on the black market though.
I suspect that somebody sold it to an obscura collector, film production, or pervert.
I think you are blissfully unaware of the current scope of clinical trial fraud in the US right now.
That is not a joke. There is so much cash changing hands that "medical" practices are getting into patient care just to be able to enroll them in lucrative trials -- and when the studies are double or quadruple blinded, there may not even be any real patients at all.
And if you do happen to be aware of just how widespread clinical trial fraud is, don't forget about where the first study cadavers came from, purchased by very respectable schools of higher education. So many that throughout the 19th century graves had all manner of anti-theft devices, watchmen, and story material for Edgar Allan Poe.
Maybe someone did sell these organs to a private collector; even Harvard got caught selling parts of parts last year. But it's just as likely to be a seemingly "legit" organization as not, one with targets to meet and not able to recruit volunteers (or volunteers with the correct anomalies) in enough numbers to meet their needs.
EDITED TO ADD: I only linked one part, but this is an eight-parts series by Reuters, and an excellent read for anyone who really wants to understand how widespread this is (may I suggest not reading it anywhere near bedtime):
Do you know how someone goes about getting set up to donate their body to science? I want that done with my body, but have no idea how to get it set up and put in a will.
Sorry, no, I am not a lawyer. But it should be pretty simple, like just putting a directive to that effect in a will, I guess.
They have to feed the zombies in administration something
So it's Squid Game without the cash prize, got it.
Looks like America is starting to follow China’s lead with regards to organ harvesting…
Did they at least ask before dismembering then?
"May we have your liver?"
"Might as well throw in the intestines, liver, brain and pancreas while you're at it"
Once again: prisons in the USA south are fucked. Worst in America. The brutality of christian states is horrifying.
this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2024
280 points (99.0% liked)
News
24554 readers
1289 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS