221
submitted 10 months ago by SecurityPro@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

The Bill includes no definition of hate and is wide open to abuse by bad actors. Defend free speech – say no to this legislation, and any legislation of is kind... Anywhere!

https://x.com/FreeSpeechIre/status/1746854766032846910?t=g8nSn9maY3dX0v76oHa9Cg&s=09[https://x.com/FreeSpeechIre/status/1746854766032846910?t=g8nSn9maY3dX0v76oHa9Cg&s=09](url)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 76 points 10 months ago

Not clicking on a Shitter link mate

[-] otter@lemmy.ca 37 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Cleaned and redirected link

https://nitter.net/FreeSpeechIre/status/1746854766032846910

Still, the news link below is probably a better source. I don't know what 'FreeSpeechIre' is

[-] kbal@fedia.io 46 points 10 months ago

It's too bad you couldn't find a link to somewhere other than x.com. Just going by the headline though, this could lead to great new career opportunities for Irish black market contraband meme dealers.

[-] SheeEttin@programming.dev 14 points 10 months ago
[-] Kissaki@feddit.de 14 points 10 months ago

Freedom of expression is a protected right under both the Irish constitution and the European Convention on Human Rights.

So not at all what the post title claims?

[-] SecurityPro@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

Freedom of expression?

[https://extra.ie/2021/02/21/news/irish-news/gardai-tell-woman-to-take-down-social-media-post-after-she-identifies-herself-as-child-abuse-victim(url) https://extra.ie/2021/02/21/news/irish-news/gardai-tell-woman-to-take-down-social-media-post-after-she-identifies-herself-as-child-abuse-victim

[-] AutomaticJack@beehaw.org 4 points 10 months ago

Thats a completely different scenario and frankly, you're being dishonest putting that forward as an example of freedom of expression being blocked.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] otp@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

Freedom of expression generally doesn't mean you can say anything without limitation

[-] SecurityPro@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

So an adult victim of a crime can't admit that they were the victim of a crime?

[-] otp@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

I'm not familiar with the laws of Ireland, but considering that article you linked, I guess I'm that specific instance, the answer is "No".

They still have freedom of expression.

[-] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 10 months ago

It's fucking hilarious how x.com still redirects to twitter.com

[-] andyburke@fedia.io 34 points 10 months ago

honestly the lamest and funniest bit.

Perfectly ties the whole thing up in a bow: can't even technically manage a domain name change.

[-] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 23 points 10 months ago

Willing to bet some motherfucker has hardcoded twitter domain on the backend in one (or many) link generation process(es) on the basis "it's not like they're going to change the name" and now it borks occasionally if they use x.com

[-] Murdoc@sh.itjust.works 11 points 10 months ago

For some reason I'm now thinking about a video game called x.com where you have to fight aliens who have infiltrated and taken over a major social media site and are trying to TAKE OVER THE WORLD Wide Web.
(Actually, that kinda sounds like a sequal to x-bill.)

[-] andyburke@fedia.io 7 points 10 months ago
[-] andyburke@fedia.io 10 points 10 months ago

of course, switching it back might not be so easy... 😂

[-] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 9 points 10 months ago

Oh god. You've probably hit the nail on the head both directions all the same, how many methods/classes/variables are going to have twitter in the name somewhere. Or random bash scripts that pass an arg to something else from a job scheduler. This shit gives me the heebeejeebees just thinking about it.

[-] Balthazar@sopuli.xyz 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Oh, shit. x.com = twitter, it's not Xcom (the game series) xD | That took me waaay to long to realise lol

[-] Rozz@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 10 months ago

How does one possess a meme?

[-] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 21 points 10 months ago

Possession is nine-tenths of the meme.

[-] Rozz@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 10 months ago

That doesn't clear up anything!

[-] Infiltrated_ad8271@kbin.social 10 points 10 months ago

Receive it in an ad and keep it on your disk as a cache?

[-] admiralteal@kbin.social 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

And you all thought NFTs were dumb.

[-] SecurityPro@lemmy.ml 6 points 10 months ago

Post it on social media.

[-] khannie@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Friend sends it to you on WhatsApp for example

[-] KpntAutismus@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

again, literally 1984.

[-] Facebones@reddthat.com 8 points 10 months ago

It's an Unpopular opinion but free speech as it gets translated in modern society can suck a dick.

Shit only applies to the left anyway, the right can call for violence against their enemies and be fine but if you say you'll defend yourself it's a ban on Le socials

[-] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Free Speech Ireland on twitter

You need to take a crash course in media literacy. This is little more than a propaganda account and you're posting it uncritically wholesale.

[-] FrankTheHealer@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

I'm.irish and this is the first I'm hearing about this.

I'm doubtful such a thing would be a priority for this government since they are very unpopular given the housing crisis and cost of living increase. They will do everything to scrape votes ahead of the next election.

[-] khannie@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I'd never heard of it either but apparently it's already passed through the dáil. Seems like it's coming. I believe it's well intentioned and I generally agree with it but my concern is around a future potentially authoritarian government that might abuse it to silence dissent.

I'm just about to add a top level comment with my digging. Will link it here in a minute.

https://lemmy.world/comment/6751657

[-] khannie@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

I'm from Ireland and had never heard of this so did some digging and used bard to summarise (it did a very solid job)

Can you tell me about the proposed hate speech legislation that's proposed for Ireland

The proposed hate speech legislation in Ireland, known as the Criminal Justice (Incitement to Violence or Hatred and Hate Offences) Bill 2022, aims to strengthen existing laws against hate speech and introduce new measures to tackle hate crimes. The bill has been through several stages of the legislative process and is currently awaiting final approval in the Irish Parliament.

Key Provisions of the Bill

The bill proposes several significant changes to the current legal framework on hate speech and hate crimes:

Expansion of Protected Characteristics: The bill expands the list of protected characteristics from five to seven, including gender and disability.

New Offense of Incitement to Violence or Hatred: The bill introduces a new criminal offense of incitement to violence or hatred. This offense would apply to any communication or behavior that is likely to incite violence or hatred against a person or group of persons on the basis of their protected characteristics.

Hate Crime Provisions: The bill introduces new aggravated forms of existing criminal offenses, such as assault, where those offenses are motivated by hatred against a person with a protected characteristic. This would mean that such offenses would be punished more severely.

Protection Against Hate-Motivated Harassment: The bill also includes measures to protect against hate-motivated harassment, such as stalking, intimidation, and discrimination in employment or housing.

Proposed Timeline for Implementation

The bill has already passed through the Dáil (Irish House of Representatives) and is currently at the stage of committee discussion in the Seanad (Irish Senate). If approved by the Seanad and signed into law by the President, the bill would likely come into effect in late 2024 or early 2025.

Debate and Controversy Surrounding the Bill

The proposed hate speech legislation has been met with both support and opposition. Supporters argue that the bill is necessary to protect vulnerable groups from hate speech and to deter hate crimes. They believe that the current legal framework is inadequate and that the new offenses will provide greater protection for victims of hate-motivated violence.

Opponents of the bill argue that it is an infringement on freedom of speech and that it could be used to stifle legitimate criticism of religious or political groups. They also express concern that the definition of hate speech is too vague and that the bill could be used to prosecute individuals for expressing unpopular or offensive opinions.

The debate surrounding the proposed hate speech legislation highlights the complex and sensitive nature of this issue. While there is a clear need to protect people from hate speech and hate crimes, it is also important to safeguard freedom of expression and ensure that the law is not used to stifle legitimate debate.

What ways could this legislation be abused by an authoritarian government?

Authoritarian governments could abuse the proposed hate speech legislation in a number of ways, including:

Silencing political dissent: The vague definition of hate speech could be used to prosecute individuals for expressing unpopular or critical views of the government or its policies. This could create a chilling effect on free speech and prevent people from speaking out against the government.

Suppressing minority groups: The bill could be used to target and silence minority groups, such as religious or ethnic minorities. This could create a climate of fear and intimidation and prevent these groups from exercising their rights.

Spreading propaganda: The government could use the bill to silence journalists and activists who are reporting on human rights abuses or corruption. This could allow the government to control the flow of information and maintain its grip on power.

Stifling public debate: The bill could be used to prevent people from discussing sensitive issues, such as the government's role in human rights abuses or the role of religion in society. This could prevent the public from engaging in open and honest debate about important issues.

It is important to note that these are just a few of the ways that an authoritarian government could abuse the proposed hate speech legislation. The potential for abuse is significant, and it is important to carefully consider the implications of this legislation before it is enacted.

In conclusion, the proposed hate speech legislation in Ireland is a well-intentioned bill that aims to protect vulnerable groups from hate speech and hate crimes. However, there is a risk that this legislation could be abused by an authoritarian government to silence political dissent, suppress minority groups, spread propaganda, and stifle public debate. It is important to carefully consider the potential for abuse before this legislation is enacted.

[-] governorkeagan@lemdro.id 4 points 10 months ago
[-] xilliah@beehaw.org 1 points 10 months ago

Also I've always felt that distribution is the problem, if you can call it that.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2024
221 points (90.2% liked)

Privacy

31987 readers
462 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS