200
submitted 10 months ago by robocall@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

The 118th Congress will be remembered for many firsts: Electing the first Black leader in the House, that 15-round speaker’s vote, and then removing that same speaker. The latest: Leadership swapped their apple-green members’ pins for deep navy ones mid-cycle at a cost of $40,000, according to one source familiar with the decision.

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 50 points 10 months ago

So, like... you know how these freaking boomers bitch at "kids these days" for their participation trophies??

This. This is a participation trophy. Try telling them they can't have it. I dare you.

[-] Copernican@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago

A participation trophy for participating in a group made almost exclusively of election winners of various congressional districts?

[-] Copernican@lemmy.world 33 points 10 months ago

40,000 bucks for 540 people is like 75 bucks a person. It's only a big deal if folks make it a big deal to spend time debating discussing. The biggest waste is spending significant time debating this given the salaries of all members involved.

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 14 points 10 months ago

It's still congress carving out a special perk for themselves. Give them a basic badge like all the support staff, and make them provide their own lanyard/case like they likely do for everyone else.

[-] Copernican@lemmy.world -2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It’s still congress carving out a special perk for themselves.

It's part of the job. It is a special privilege to be a member of congress. And the tradition of a congressional pin goes back a long time. I don't think it's uncommon for members of government to have some trinket the is a physical display of their position.

https://rollcall.com/2005/01/20/for-members-of-congress-traditional-lapel-pin-serves-as-more-than-just-a-form-of-identification/

[-] JustUseMint@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago
[-] CraigeryTheKid@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

Still sounds high though, right? Are they made of tantalum?

[-] Copernican@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Just think of all the tech bros and finance bros with their branded Patagonia vests and backpacks. $75 for federally elected leaders to have a pin that doubles as a security badge is a nothing burger, and shouldn't distract from passing of a budget which I am actually scared about.

[-] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf -1 points 10 months ago

It could have been one tenth as much and still be a gigantic waste of money AND it demonstrates how they're a bunch of gigantic hypocrites.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago

I wish I could just find $40,000 under the couch.

[-] voracitude@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Be the US government and you'll find a lot more than that, in much stranger places.

[-] numberfour002@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Stranger even than a live armadillo in the anus?

[-] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

That's strange?

[-] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 1 points 10 months ago

Moscow Mitch doesn't like carrying a wallet. Ruins the lines of the suit he'll hopefully soon be buried in.

[-] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 17 points 10 months ago

Needed new participation trophies

[-] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

My 13 year old budgets her money better than grown ass humans.

“Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely”

[-] AnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 10 months ago

Well, I'm going to go find out how many they bought. I doubt it will improve my opinion of the situation.

[-] Zitronensaft@feddit.de 13 points 10 months ago

There are 435 voting members from states and 6 non-voting members who represent US territories like American Samoa, so likely at least 435 pins and maybe a handful more. That comes to a little over $90/pin.

[-] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

That’s an expensive pin.

[-] sramder@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Doesn’t fit on thicker chains because the clasp is to small??? How does this apply to a pin or broach or whatever this ugly turd of a government collectable is.

[-] oDDmON@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

“Thicker chains”. What, like Mr. T?

[-] sramder@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Maybe Madison Cawthorne, dressed as Mr. T… that’d be a cool costume ;-)

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The federal government operates on a scale of millions or billions of dollars. This is a 0.04 million dollar purchase. Nobody should care.

this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2024
200 points (96.7% liked)

politics

19145 readers
1672 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS