585

Senator’s bid to make US military support conditional on whether Israel is violating human rights in Gaza fails by 72 votes to 11

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] PugJesus@kbin.social 167 points 8 months ago

Unsurprising. Thank you, Bernie, for trying.

[-] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 95 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Every time America is about to/in the process of making a mistake there's a video of Bernie Sanders warning everyone not to do it.

[-] PugJesus@kbin.social 30 points 8 months ago

Our very own Cassandra of Troy.

[-] Rootiest@lemmy.world 21 points 8 months ago

Bernie is a national treasure, we don't deserve him

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 74 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Anyone got a list of who supported it?

Edit: so far I found that it was Sanders (duh), Rand Paul, and 9 democrats. Not sure who

Edit 2: per https://www.businessinsider.com/which-senators-voted-bernie-sanders-resolution-israel-human-rights-violations-2024-1?amp

Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky

Democratic Sen. Martin Heinrich of New Mexico

Democratic Sen. Jeff Merkley of Oregon

Independent Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont

Democratic Sen. Chris Van Hollen of Maryland

Democratic Sen. Ed Markey of Massachusetts

Democratic Sen. Laphonza Butler of California

Democratic Sen. Ben Ray Lujan of New Mexico

Democratic Sen. Mazie Hirono of Hawaii

Democratic Sen. Peter Welch of Vermont

Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 24 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Anyone got a list of who abstained? I want to do the math so I know how large the Senate Genocide Caucus is.

EDIT: I was trying to do math and kept overlooking how the article said that it was 72-11, which would mean 17 abstaining or absent. The Senate Genocide Caucus is 72 members wide.

[-] Deceptichum@kbin.social 15 points 8 months ago
[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

If my arithmetic is correct, the Senate Genocide Caucus consists of 2 Independents, 32 Republicans, and 37 Democrats.

[-] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 7 points 8 months ago

=71. You're short 1. (vote was 72-11)

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

I see what I did. I subtracted from 48 Republicans instead of 49. The Senate Genocide Caucus has 2 Independents, 33 Republicans, and 37 Democrats.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Grassley is in hospital

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 10 points 8 months ago

Rand Paul accidentally stumbles into the correct opinion.

[-] Deceptichum@kbin.social 8 points 8 months ago

Rand (and Ron) Paul always confuses me.

[-] chaogomu@kbin.social 25 points 8 months ago

What's there to be confused about?

Ron is a soft-spoken man who stood firm in his convictions, and was quietly friendly with white nationals and other horrible people. He's retired now.

Rand is a bit of a blow hard with no convictions, and is loudly friendly with white nationals and other horrible people. He's a sitting senator.

[-] Deceptichum@kbin.social 18 points 8 months ago

Because compared to other nameable Republicans, he occasionally votes in ways that are agreeable with many leftists. But like you said, he's also still a massive piece of shit.

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 months ago

Even a stopped clock is right twice a day...

[-] verdantbanana@lemmy.world 49 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Sanders is proof the US is working on a rigged system

he has had the people's interest at heart since he first started his political career in the 60s and not just the US citizens

[-] TrippyFocus@lemmy.ml 49 points 8 months ago

Voting List for Anyone Interested

Fuck everyone that continues to support this genocide.

[-] BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago

Important to note that this is a motion to table - so the "Yea" vote means they disagree with Bernie's resolution.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DuckOverload@lemmy.world 45 points 8 months ago

Bernie Sanders is obviously a raging anti-Semite.

[-] BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world 28 points 8 months ago

The ADL just declared that Jewish Voice for Peace are antisemitic so Bernie probably isn't far behind.

[-] foggianism@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

I hope you are being sarcastic.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SpiceyDejarik@lemm.ee 39 points 8 months ago

The measure was a first-of-its-kind tapping into a decades-old law that would require the US state department to, within 30 days, produce a report on whether the Israeli war effort in Gaza is violating human rights and international accords. If the administration failed to do so, US military aid to Israel, long assured without question, could be quickly halted.

Those senators must be pretty confident that a report would find human rights violations. Why would they oppose it otherwise?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] verdantbanana@lemmy.world 29 points 8 months ago

if only democrats actually stood for what they say they stand for

we could of had eight years of bernie instead of eight years of further decline with trump and biden

[-] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 27 points 8 months ago

Sigh, the US government never fails to disappoint.

[-] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

if you think israel didn't do anything wrong, why oppose an investigation?

(also milosevic did the same thing in the 90s and was prosecuted for it by the icc - the us supported that then)

[-] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Serbia bad, Israel good. Realpolitik

[-] oDDmON@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago

Doesn’t look like there are many scruples left in DC.

[-] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

There weren't any in the first place.

[-] nothingcorporate@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago

This is the stupidest timeline.

[-] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

During the Sheikh Jarrah incident I contacted everyone who politically represents me and told them to re-evaluate how freely they fund Isreal, they all gave me lots of lip service telling me they will consider it when opportunities arise and every last one of them voted against this. I don't think I've ever in my life been accurately represented politically on a federal level, and the only reason that's not true locally is because I've testified to local government committees on things that actually made it to the state house floor.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 13 points 8 months ago

It sometimes feels like Bernie Sanders is the only American leader with an actual heart.

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 9 points 8 months ago

I knew he was "my guy" when I finally realized who he was in 2016. There was a time I watched a lot of documentaries, and every time this scraggly haired old dude was shown in some random clip of Congress doing their thing in relation to the documentary, he was always on the right side of the argument. So I see Bernie Sanders running and I said "oh shit, it's that guy!"

No wonder the media demonizes him...

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago

Well, at least it was the right method. They didn't hide behind Biden.

[-] trackcharlie@lemmynsfw.com 12 points 8 months ago

What did anyone expect? Both sides take military industrial complex money

[-] PugJesus@kbin.social 4 points 8 months ago

Don't think the MIC is the deciding factor here, nor that the MIC particularly cares whether aid is attached to human rights scrutiny.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I'm supposed to believe the Dems that voted against this also care about saving democracy? They don't even care about basic human rights. We're going full speed into the worst timeline.

[-] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

Warren also voted with Sanders.

[-] dan42O@infosec.pub 6 points 8 months ago

Is this an active coup that’s been playing out since 60s or when ever this shadowy government does? Is this the same thing like how one president get 1 free murder, no questions asked but like on large scales?

[-] ooli@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Isnt that a proof that Israel dont respect human rights?

[-] Guy_Fieris_Hair@lemmy.world 22 points 8 months ago

It is more proof that the US doesn't give a shit.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

It's more proof that the US does give a shit, and that the US prefers that human rights not be respected.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 5 points 8 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


US senators have defeated a measure, introduced by Bernie Sanders, that would have made military aid to Israel conditional on whether the Israeli government is violating human rights and international accords in its devastating war in Gaza.

“We must ensure that US aid is being used in accordance with human rights and our own laws,” Sanders said in a speech before the vote urging support for the resolution, lamenting what he described as the Senate’s failure to consider any measure looking at the war’s effect on civilians.

Sanders wrote on Twitter/X that his resolution directed the state department “to report on any human rights violations that may have occurred using US equipment in the Israeli military campaign in Gaza”, adding: “It should not be controversial to ask how US weapons are used.”

It would have forced the state department to provide a report within 30 days – and aid to Israel would be cut off if human rights violations were found.

Amid anti-war protests across the US, progressive representatives including Rashida Tlaib, Ilhan Omar, Barbara Lee and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez have called for a ceasefire.

Speaking from the Republican side before the measure was introduced on Tuesday evening, South Carolina senator Lindsay Graham said that Hamas, the Islamist group, has “militarized” schools and hospitals in the territory by operating amongst them.


The original article contains 597 words, the summary contains 220 words. Saved 63%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] YeetPics@mander.xyz 3 points 8 months ago
[-] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 8 months ago

Geopolitics overrides morality.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2024
585 points (98.7% liked)

politics

18909 readers
3556 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS