262
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by Theprogressivist@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Churches campaigning for Trump? Take away their tax-exempt status.

Non Paywalled Link: https://ghostarchive.org/archive/x2zrw

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Botanicals@lemmy.world 94 points 10 months ago

Remember, if you see or hear a church actively campaigning for any sort of politics you can report them and get their tax free status taken away. 👍

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago

That’s the brilliant thing about the making politics about cultural issues. Churches can campaign for culture shit all day long. They just can’t say “vote for _____.”

[-] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 29 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

But Trump has made clear he won’t punish churches that violate the Johnson amendment in 2024, even vowing on a Christian nationalist broadcast last May that he’ll abolish the prohibition if reelected.

But that's exactly what they're doing.

[-] Jaysyn@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago

Even when they do, and I have sent in photo of a local church with "Trump 2020" on their placard, nothing at all happens to them.

They aren't even contacted as far as I can tell.

[-] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 10 months ago

I didn't know that was a thing that could happen

I've got to do some research because my grandparents church has been doing this since Bush Sr.

[-] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Not a single church ever has had their tax status taken away for politics. It doesn't happen

[-] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 1 points 10 months ago

It happened in 92, but that's the only publicly known instance.

[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 9 points 10 months ago

I mean, it’s supposed to work that way but that's extremely rare.

[-] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 33 points 10 months ago

If enough get reported, especially since now it's been vocalized and reported. They're going to be forced to do something about it. I acknowledge it is wishful thinking, though, but don't give up. Report these fucks either way.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 16 points 10 months ago

Doing something about it has a non-zero chance of success.

Doing nothing about it has a guaranteed chance of failure.

[-] Hyperreality@kbin.social 13 points 10 months ago

Can I report a church I don't attend, just so they become paranoid about who snitched?

[-] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yup, as long as they're campaigning for Trump or campaigning for political figures in general, have at it.

[-] admiralteal@kbin.social 10 points 10 months ago

Someone with some cyberintelligence background could have a lot of fun setting their software to search for social media posts from pastors/churches looking for explicit political messaging.

[-] knobbysideup@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago

Maybe talk to the local news about it.

[-] PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 months ago

Record it happening so you have evidence to back it up. Get it onto social media so everyone can help report it, too!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] IHasAHat@startrek.website -1 points 10 months ago

you can report them and get their tax free status taken away

And remember, that report will go nowhere and you'll accomplish nothing! The IRS has never gone after a church for this. Never. Reporting them is just as effective as quietly whispering "please tax them" into your pillow at night.

I wish people would recognize the failures in our system and stop suggesting others do shit that doesn't actually work.

[-] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Then what do you suggest? You obviously have better ideas? Or do you prefer to just bitch about things and not try to make a change?

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I also wish people would stop saying there's no hope so do nothing.

No, record them and send it to the IRS. If nothing happens then fine. Nothing was lost. Along with that work towards change. Telling people the system is broken so do nothing is not going to get you the change you want.

[-] eestileib@sh.itjust.works -1 points 10 months ago
[-] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

So your answer is to do nothing and be apathetic?

[-] Jaysyn@kbin.social 0 points 10 months ago

I've reported a church, with photo evidence from multiple angles. Literally nothing happened.

That law has never been enforced against a "legitimate" church.

[-] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

We totally believe you random internet stranger. Totally.

[-] IHasAHat@startrek.website -2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It's more pointing out how the suggested action is bullshit. It's like if you had a leaking roof and someone said to blow soap bubbles on it. And then when you point out that's a nonsensical solution that has no chance of working, they reply "oH, so YoU juSt waNT to Do NotHinG anD bE apaThEtic?"

Pointing out that someones suggestion is a non-solution is not an endorsement of doing nothing. It's pointing out that the suggestion is not helpful and distracts from actual solutions.

Pretending the IRS would actually go after a church is ignoring the reality of the situation. I don't want suggestions that would only work in some deluded made up fantasy world.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 5 points 10 months ago

It takes little effort. You're saying to not do it, while also not suggesting anything to do. Your suggestion has an even lower chance of success than the OP, so if anyone shouldn't be listened to it's you.

Collect evidence and submit it. Also work on getting better elected officials, unionizing, protesting, and whatever else you can do. If your suggestion is to stop doing something and not replacing it with something more effective then you should just keep your mouth shut.

[-] IHasAHat@startrek.website 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

How about we throw a bunch of birthday candles in the nearest lake?

And remember, you can't tell me that's stupid and unproductive because by your logic, that would clearly mean you are advocating for doing nothing.

Are you starting to see how nonsense your argument is?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Fapper_McFapper@lemmy.world 31 points 10 months ago

Yes, violate your 501c status. We’re watching and ready to report you.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 15 points 10 months ago

Effectively 1/3 of the US is Nones (and growing). I don't have the breakdown in front of me, but a sizeable number are "switchers," people who left their childhood religion.

I'm personally now an ex-fundigelical antitheist, so I would relish the opportunity to report them!

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

I'm a currently exvangelical Christian and I would also relish the opportunity to report them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago

Christofacists are the fucking worst

[-] Untitled4774@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

I hate Illinois nazis

[-] thesprongler@lemmy.world 25 points 10 months ago

Fine, as long as they have their tax exempt status removed.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

They won't, because the politicians they elect will defend their base of support.

This isn't like when Obama/Pelosi went after ACORN in 2009. Or SCOTUS struck down the right of unions to fund raise for candidates under the Janis decision. Or FOX News spent months freaking out over the Ground Zero Mosque. Or Midwestern governors tried to cancel Sunday early voting in order to undermine "Souls to the Polls" black Evangelical turnout. These are people with real money and influence who aren't to be fucked with.

Conservatives will tap that reserve whole heartedly. Liberals will just shrug and say they can't be taxed because of The Norms.

[-] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 25 points 10 months ago

If anyone finds any especially with video evidence I am more than happy to take a minute to report the shits to the IRS.

[-] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Why? The IRS never does shit about it. Churches get away with this shit daily

[-] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 6 points 10 months ago

Do the churches get reported? Because I doubt the people going to them are doing it.

[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

This makes me want to go back to church. Just a little though.

[-] NABDad@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago

Someone commented a while ago that "Nationalist Christians" is a better name for these groups because it conveniently reduces to an easy to remember abbreviation: NatC's

I really think we should push that.

[-] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 1 points 10 months ago

Cnat isn't a hard to remember abbreviation, though.

[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

Say NatC out loud. You may find it sounds a lot like another term that applies to Christian Nationalists.

[-] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 1 points 10 months ago

Ah, I see now

[-] DarkGamer@kbin.social 10 points 10 months ago

Enforce the Johnson amendment

[-] grue@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

This is what you get when you consistently don't crack down on churches abusing their tax-exempt status starting a decade (or longer) ago.

[-] taanegl@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Ah yes, a false prophet parade. You'd think Christians would do something about that.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 1 points 10 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


It’s a brazen effort to transform religious congregations — which are technically supposed to keep electoral politics out of the pulpit — into a campaign powerhouse for the former president.

He spent much of the recent holiday weekend attempting to trash the legacy of a storied Christian reverend, Martin Luther King, Jr.)

The law is rarely enforced, and has been skirted by churches of all political orientations — whether by pastors who make their personal endorsements public or by congregations organizing turnout-boosting efforts like “souls to the polls.”

But Trump has made clear he won’t punish churches that violate the Johnson amendment in 2024, even vowing on a Christian nationalist broadcast last May that he’ll abolish the prohibition if reelected.

During his podcast, Wallnau insisted that the Courage Tour will also be working with right-wing women’s groups including Moms for America — which touts “truth, family, freedom and the Constitution” — and Concerned Women for America, a group dedicated to “Biblical values and Constitutional principles.” Wallnau insisted: “We’re creating a broad net.”

The movement poses a danger to democracy because it “sees no room for compromise,” Andrew Whitehead, author of Taking America Back for God: Christian Nationalism in the United States has told Rolling Stone.


The original article contains 1,120 words, the summary contains 205 words. Saved 82%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

religious congregations — which are technically supposed to keep electoral politics out of the pulpit

Why would large, well-organized, ideologically unified groups of people stay out of electoral politics?

Aren't these exactly the kinds of organizations you'd expect to be hip deep in political organizing and activism?

The movement poses a danger to democracy

I have to say that I think their views are often shit. But they are fundamentally popular shit. Hardly antidemocratic.

Liberals would do well to fight fire with fire. Attend big social groups. Organize with your neighbors. Raise money, run candidates, and enforce ideological orthodoxy as a condition of membership.

Hoping that some rules lawyers at the IRS are going to make Houston's Second Baptist Church go away seems both foolish and unproductive.

[-] white_shotgun@aussie.zone 1 points 10 months ago

Screwed up i tell ya it's all farked

[-] eestileib@sh.itjust.works -1 points 10 months ago

It's not like the IRS would do anything about it.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2024
262 points (98.5% liked)

politics

19144 readers
1551 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS