309
submitted 10 months ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 211 points 10 months ago

Genz can't afford a car. Even used cars cost too damn much

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 88 points 10 months ago

Same shit as when Millennials were killing home ownership.

[-] Foofighter@discuss.tchncs.de 55 points 10 months ago
[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 46 points 10 months ago

Though I admit, part of the reason I don't buy diamonds is specifically to fuck the diamond industry. Because fuck those scammers.

[-] ericisshort@lemmy.world 29 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Maybe they’d have money for cars and homes and diamonds if it weren’t for all that damn avocado toast!

[-] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

Yeah, but then the headlines would be blaming millennials for killing the avocado market.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Moneo@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

AFAIK similar articles (about driving less) were also penned about millennials and genxers.

[-] ares35@kbin.social 33 points 10 months ago

yea. it's not entirely by choice.

[-] Iampossiblyatwork@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

Millenials can't afford cars...

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 114 points 10 months ago

Years ago when my Gen Z nephew was turning 16 (minimum driving age in USA), the conversation went like this:

  • "Are you excited to start driving and do you want car?"
  • "Nah, not interested"
  • "Why not?"
  • "Where would I go?"
  • "Wherever you want!"
  • "Everything I want is right here at home"

I thought about my own Gen X early driving experience with the freedom to go to the mall or the movie theater whenever I wanted and to drive to school or work.

  • His school (and eventually job) were both within walking bicycling distance.
  • He had streaming services I never dreamed of when I was his age piping a flood of big budget movies right to his TV whenever he wants
  • malls are dead

I couldn't really argue with his logic. Years later he did get a car when he moved out and lived farther away from work. However, it was many years after the minimum driving age which was a big departure from generations prior.

[-] Graphy@lemmy.world 35 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

For me the appeal of a car was having somewhere private to do drugs, awkwardly make out with girls, and hide from my parents.

I feel like those things are somewhat timeless?

[-] Moneo@lemmy.world 30 points 10 months ago

All of those things can and always have been accomplished without the use of a car.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Evotech@lemmy.world 113 points 10 months ago
[-] YeeterPan@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago

Gotta package wealth disparity as a feel-good environmentalist story :)

[-] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 78 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

"Gen-z is choosing to be homeless."

These crazy kids are forgoing the tradition of having a roof over ones head in favor of urban camping. It definitely has nothing to do the kleptocracy that made housing unaffordable by converting it into a speculative market for Wall Street and foreign nationals to park dirty money.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] dhork@lemmy.world 69 points 10 months ago

Don't forget insurance, either. A new driver will pay sky-high rates for the first few years. And while one can technically have a license but not pay for insurance if they don't own a car, if they ever do get a car insurance may end up even higher, since they dont have a history of good driving under insurance while their peers do.

[-] admiralteal@kbin.social 28 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I found out one of my 22-y-o coworkers, with no accident history or the like, pays as much quarterly as I do annually for car insurance.

It's just nuts. Used vehicle prices are through the roof in no small part because new vehicles are now ABSURDLY big and expensive.

AAA is now rating the cost of a new car to be something like $0.50-$1 per mile to operate. Or an average of $12k per year. When you carefully do the math, a lot of people are finding that the rideshares aren't much more expensive -- plus now they don't need to deal with the non-monetary costs of car ownership (maintenance, parking, fear of accident/theft, etc). And you can get blackout drunk to try and tune out the chaos of a dying planet and still be able to get home.

Not to mention car accidents are still, last I checked, the main killer of young people.

[-] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 11 points 10 months ago

This is why I think owning a self driving car won't be a thing. Uber and such will just have a fleet driving around all day

[-] admiralteal@kbin.social 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yep, and the technology to operate that fleet is only 5 years away. Just like it has been for the last 15.

Anything to make communities think it is safe to refuse to invest in any other transportation mode.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] meep_launcher@lemm.ee 62 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

In the article they noted this was the same for millennials and gen x before them. I'm going to assume the standard for youths purchasing cars was with the baby boomer generation. I know my dad told me when he was young, you would purchase a cool car that didn't work for the equivalent of $100 dollars, get a friend to tow it home, then work on it for a few weeks to get it running. He told me how much he missed his MG Midget, which let's recognize as a cool ass car for a kid to have. He could fix that car with a wrench, a stick of butter, and a deck of cars*. All his friends would be doing the same.

Nowadays it would be a $1k junker, and you'd need to have a computer science degree to fix the onboard computer while having all the specific tools to get into their proprietary parts. There are older cars too, but the standard of fixing a car has increased, all the while each generation has less time and money to do it.

  • This was a typo, but I love this typo. You say deck of cards, I say deck of cars, Thank you @otp@sh.itjust.works !
[-] otp@sh.itjust.works 10 points 10 months ago

_He could fix that car with a wrench, a stick of butter, and a deck of cars.

Well yeah, having a whole deck of other cars would make it pretty simple!

[-] trackcharlie@lemmynsfw.com 45 points 10 months ago

Is it really a choice if they fundamentally cannot afford to do so?

[-] Moneo@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

Many can and choose not too. Fuck cars.

[-] trackcharlie@lemmynsfw.com 16 points 10 months ago

Don't disagree with you but north american infrastructure is not set up for public transit

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Witchfire@lemmy.world 40 points 10 months ago

I'm a millennial, but I fucking hate driving and gave it up a while ago. My eyesight is really bad due to misformed corneas so I have trauma from being forced to drive at a younger age. I eventually moved to a major city and got rid of my car the first chance I could (fun fact, leases are scams!). I love being able to walk/take public transit anywhere I want now, but unfortunately leaving the city is incredibly hard.

Fuck cars.

[-] mechoman444@lemmy.world 33 points 10 months ago

Well how the fuck are they supposed to drive when car payment at 500+, gas is 3+ a gallon and car insurance is 1500 per premium! Not to mention potential repairs.

I make 80k a year and I can barely afford my car!

[-] cybersandwich@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

These articles are so bad. There is no actual research behind them. It's all "it could be this"...well fucking dig into that maybe and get back to us with actual journalism.

Not to mention it's all based on ba consulting firm findings. It's McKinsey so they probably just want to lay people off and are using this research to support that recommendation.

[-] chowdertailz@lemmy.world 30 points 10 months ago

Millennial chiming in. Donated my car to the humane society a couple years ago. Thankfully I live close enough to walk to work, have plenty of amenities near by, and a bus line a block away when it runs. I've saved so much money about it. If I need a car for a couple of days I rent and it's still less than owning. Do not regret it at all.

Every now and then I think about buying a used car and the prices are absurd on top of all the maintenance, insurance, registration.

[-] tunetardis@lemmy.ca 29 points 10 months ago

Ah, so it's not just my kids (I'm Gen X). Neither has expressed any interest in driving. One's a starving student, so I guess there's that. But the other's graduated and scored a cushy job where he could certainly afford wheels if he wanted. I asked him about it and he's like nah. I'll just take a lyft or whatever if I need it. And he's a software dev so he spends the time on his laptop. I guess if he were driving, his time would be less productive? I dunno.

We actually went to the same tech convention last fall in Denver and shared a hotel. I knee-jerk rented a car thinking Denver sounds like a driving town. But parking at the convention was exorbitant and we wound up ride-sharing there anyway, so I am beginning to see the merit in his way of thinking? The only time we got any use out of the rental was the last day when we had a little free time before the flight and drove up to Red Rocks. But seriously, for that one trip, the rental was hardly worth it.

[-] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 37 points 10 months ago

There's been a big boom in interest in urbanism in recent years and increasing awareness of just how the US got so car dependent. Toss in a quick trip to Europe at some point, add in people explicitly saying "the reason you liked these old cities so much was because of transit and lack of cars", and it's an idea that spreads itself.

[-] tunetardis@lemmy.ca 12 points 10 months ago

Yeah I hate urban sprawl and how the city planners where I live keep wanting to perpetuate it. I commute most days on an ebike and try to drive less. The only major exception is in my side-gig as a musician in a band. Just too much gear to carry around without 4 wheels.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 20 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Cars are expensive and driving really isn't that fun outside rare circumstances that are quickly disappearing. I love cars, and I love a nice drive on a mountain road, but everything else isn't nearly as nice as it used to be when there were fewer people driving, and less dependence on it.

Not to mention, cars are pretty boring these days. The vaguely cool ones are just remakes of old models, and even Ferrari is making SUVs.

[-] admiralteal@kbin.social 28 points 10 months ago

The greatest enemy of good driving conditions is and always will be other drivers. The people who really care about being able to drive should be enthusiastically supporting getting others off the roads because congestion is inevitable.

Especially since it costs less total taxpayer money that way (the classic is Houston vs NYC vs Amsterdam, which spend something like 20%, 10%, and 4% of their municipal budgets on transportation respectively). You're less likely to have congestion AND potholes in a city with trams and bike routes.

[-] Jrockwar@feddit.uk 8 points 10 months ago

I love cars, love driving, and I work in self-driving cars because I'm convinced the only people doing it should be the people who see it as a hobby, just like riding horses. You have so many people on the roads who hate it, and drive horribly because they don't care and it's an absolute pain for them. Why should those people drive, other than the fact that we don't have the technology yet to allow them not to?

(Even better, infrastructure to support them not to need cars at all, but that's a different topic. And before we get the "trains are the solution to every problem" crew, I think self driving shuttles are a cool way to diminish vehicles vs cars, that can cover at the same cost more routes than buses, achieve a higher occupancy rate, and would need next to no infrastructure changes.)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 10 months ago

The best time to drive a car was during the pandemic.

I had never seen so few cars on the road. The world felt positively idyllic.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago

Gen z earns like $15/hr.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago
[-] hglman@lemmy.ml 15 points 10 months ago

The signal of a less enthused Gen Z when it comes to driving could affect the car industry. But McKinsey analysts point out that previous generations of Americans had also appeared less interested in driving but went behind the wheel of cars eventually.

It's like a threat

[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It’s like a threat

Welcome to America. This is how it's done.

Nobody is really interested in the way things work here, it's literally about forcing you to accept that you have to live this way to even begin to survive. It's about making people make choices they wouldn't otherwise make, based on a system of requirements that is always changing.

It was the same way with homeownership until it wasn't. Americans turned more conservative as they aged and got more "skin in the game" in the markets. They started seeing their homes valuation as something important, and so businesses and stocks doing well was also suddenly important. It's interesting (not) that their children who are not able to be similarly invested because they can't even begin to afford a house are not growing up conservative.

Cars will be forced on the populace, the people that run this country have no imagination and refuse to budge because they're making too much stinking money with how it works right now and they're going to drive this sucker into the ground, drain every last penny out of the economy, and then the rich will fuck off to Europe or Australia or Honduras or somewhere they can ignore how they hollowed out one of the largest nations, which is quite an achievement.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Those scooters are pretty cool though. If you told 10 year old me there would be electric scooters just sitting around on the street in the future you could just scan and ride, I'd have called you a big fibber.

Sometimes my dog gets a surprise run, while I just get to ride a scooter.

[-] hawgietonight@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

Keeping people that don't like to drive off the roads is only a good thing.

I don't see a problem here.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Blackmist@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

Gen Z can't afford £3k a year on insurance.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] 520@kbin.social 11 points 10 months ago

From the UK, now in Europe.

There has been basically one time in my life that actually necessitated driving. Almost everything else can be covered by public transport or bikes/e-scooters/walking

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] aniki@lemm.ee 11 points 10 months ago
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Lath@kbin.social 9 points 10 months ago

Have a license, don't drive. But for me it's mostly trauma from all the times I've almost been in a crash with various drivers, myself included.
Cars are fucking dangerous and not enough drivers understand that.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2024
309 points (95.0% liked)

News

23424 readers
1530 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS