Manifest v3 is Worse than I Thought (tube.kockatoo.org)

submitted 10 months ago by ozoned@lemmy.world to c/firefox@lemmy.ml

19 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/11081020

A great video about the Manifest v3 and how Google is trying to make you view ads.

all 21 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] BM_Bourguignon@mastodon.social 21 points 10 months ago

@ozoned
Switch to #Firefox NOW !
@firefox

[-] risencode@lemmy.ml -2 points 10 months ago

Firefox will be using Manifest v3 or was this just posted in the wrong community?

[-] clgoh@lemmy.ca 11 points 10 months ago

Firefox will be compatible with V3, but keeps compatibility with V2, unlike Chromium.

[-] walthervonstolzing@lemmy.ml 7 points 10 months ago

Firefox is already compatible with v3, by the way, since version 109: https://extensionworkshop.com/documentation/develop/manifest-v3-migration-guide/

[-] cmgvd3lw@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 10 months ago

Please Firefox, when mass migration happens, dont let browser monopoly get into your head and change your policy.

I know the Ff code is open source and others can create forks. But still

[-] white_shotgun@aussie.zone 7 points 10 months ago

I'm running with the fox

[-] vox@sopuli.xyz 2 points 10 months ago

yt link:
https://youtu.be/JeTp0khnWgo

[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 7 points 10 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/JeTp0khnWgo

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[-] 1984@lemmy.today 0 points 10 months ago

No thanks.

[-] moreeni@lemm.ee 0 points 10 months ago

I haven't watched the video, but judging by the thumbnail, it's complete bullshit:

https://adguard.com/en/blog/adguard-mv3.html

[-] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 3 points 10 months ago

I'm not sure on your take of the link you posted but it quite clearly states the limitations placed on these extensions and how they can be rendered useless by the new rules.

[+] Albinjose1231@lemmy.ml -66 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

[deleted]

[-] corytheboyd@kbin.social 31 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I can assure you that Google, an ad tech company with a near monopoly on web browsers, has an interest in eliminating ad blockers in the browser that they have direct control of.

[-] backhdlp@iusearchlinux.fyi 26 points 10 months ago

Actualpy manifestV3 is awesome as they reduce the permissions of extensions on the browser.

That's literally what kills the ad-blockers. You should watch the video that's conveniently linked in the post you commented on, it's only half an hour long and well researched.

[-] the_q@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

So it won't kill ad blockers?

[-] fuzzzerd@programming.dev 10 points 10 months ago

Yes. Technically, no, you will still be able to have a very simple ad blocking addon, but for all practical purposes, mv3 will kill ad blockers as we know them today.

[+] Albinjose1231@lemmy.ml -24 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

[deleted]

[-] moody@lemmings.world 18 points 10 months ago

One of those permissions allows the extension to display the website differently from how it is received. This iterally prevents ad blockers from doing their thing.

[-] MrOtherGuy@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Indeed, but what I don't get is why on earth do people spew this damn crap about manifest v3 as a whole, when the actual issue is just the removal of "webRequestBlocking" feature that Google is about to bring along with their implementation of mv3. Why the hell aren't folks mad about the actual issue but instead just want to be mad about the whole bloody thing, which actually also does bring some very real privacy improvements among other nice things.

[-] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 5 points 10 months ago

It's like passing a bill called "protect the people" that has had an add-on that bans porn nationwide. It's easy to blame the bill.

[-] Lazarus@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago

Which are those dangerous permissions? It doesn’t change any of the permissions that allows extensions to read all site data, so it doesn’t increase privacy/eliminate data theft concerns

this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024

87 points (92.2% liked)

Firefox

17302 readers

123 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

k_o_t@lemmy.ml