315
submitted 10 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

AI spam is already starting to ruin the internet::We're starting to see one prediction come true of how artificial intelligence will affect the internet: AI-generated spam is flooding the web.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] abhibeckert@lemmy.world 88 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The web was already flooded with human generated spam, adding AI spam to the mix hasn't really changed anything meaningful - you still can't find useful content on the vast majority of webpages.

What we really need is a better search engine, one that doesn't include low quality content... that might be something AI can help with.

[-] evatronic@lemm.ee 73 points 10 months ago

That used to be Google, when they were interested in providing quality results and showing ads alongside those results, instead of just.. being an ad company.

Before that, it was Yahoo, when they were interested in providing quality results, and showing ads, instead of just being an ad company.

Before that, it was AltaVista, when they were...

...Ask Jeeves...

We'll see who's next.

[-] tias@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 10 months ago
[-] I_Miss_Daniel@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago
[-] prex@aussie.zone 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)
[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago
[-] frunch@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] podperson@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

Mid late nineties, WC was my favorite. Felt like it had the best results.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] frunch@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

I've been hearing Kagi is very good but i don't know if I'm ready to start paying for a search engine. Given the direction things are headed through, it could be worth considering

I can say that kagi is really good, yes. I don't know if google search was actually ever this good on its own, but I'm finding it a real breath of fresh air

[-] GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk 6 points 10 months ago

It's a lot better value for families, too. Much like spotify. I wouldn't pay £8/m for myself, but I would pay £16 for 6 people.

I've been looking at those plans, yeah... Currently on the lowest tier for myself, and it is pricey but personally worth it, and I want to support the project

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago

Time to bring back web rings lmao

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] lorty@lemmy.ml 36 points 10 months ago

Yes, but the sheer volume of trash these AIs can generate will be an even bigger problem that needs addressing.

[-] greybeard@lemmy.one 14 points 10 months ago

Plausable sounding trash, specifically. More plausable than what extremely low paid humans can put out.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] beardown@lemm.ee 11 points 10 months ago

The web was already flooded with human generated spam, adding AI spam to the mix hasn't really changed anything meaningful - you still can't find useful content on the vast majority of webpages.

"The river was already flooded with human generated pollution, adding truckloads of nuclear waste to the mix hasn't really changed anything meaningful - you still can't go swimming or eat the fish in the majority of waterways."

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 5 points 10 months ago

that might be something AI can help with.

No it can't.

And also it's already a solved problem. Once again - web rings, web directories, communities and acquaintances. The Web is not deus ex machina. It's a system to be used to make your hands longer, your memory bigger, your eyes sharper etc.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jet@hackertalks.com 43 points 10 months ago
[-] wikibot@lemmy.world 48 points 10 months ago

Here's the summary for the wikipedia article you mentioned in your comment:

The dead Internet theory is an online conspiracy theory that asserts that the Internet now consists mainly of bot activity and automatically generated content that is manipulated by algorithmic curation, marginalizing organic human activity. Proponents of the theory believe these bots are created intentionally to help manipulate algorithms and boost search results in order to ultimately manipulate consumers. Furthermore, some proponents of the theory accuse government agencies of using bots to manipulate public perception, stating: "The U. S. government is engaging in an artificial intelligence powered gaslighting of the entire world population.

^to^ ^opt^ ^out^^,^ ^pm^ ^me^ ^'optout'.^ ^article^ ^|^ ^about^

[-] arin@lemmy.world 45 points 10 months ago

How ironic, but i still love this bot

[-] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 6 points 10 months ago

I think that some bots are like, exceptions that prove the rule in a way. Like when we find one that's convenient and useful and facilitates human understanding and communication, it sticks out.

[-] jet@hackertalks.com 25 points 10 months ago

Yeah like this. Bots talking to bots. Some of them use llms, but it's not necessary.

I'm here for the human element.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] essteeyou@lemmy.world 40 points 10 months ago

Only fair that AI gets a turn now we've been ruining it for so long.

[-] JeffKerman1999@sopuli.xyz 39 points 10 months ago

"starting"? The net was ruined when yahoo directory failed and Google with their stupid algorithm and SEO and AdSense and monetisation came along

[-] infeeeee@lemm.ee 49 points 10 months ago

Google had to happen, manually updating a registry of all site was unsustainable with the growth of the internet.

And the concept of SEO is actually older than the internet, "AAA Plumbing" from yellow pages was also optimized for the algorithm of the the telephone registry, which was simply alphabetical order. Just different algorithm and different scale.

[-] oDDmON@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

Ppphhht.

The internet ended the day AOL threw open its doors and allowed their users out of the walled garden.

I know, I was there.

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Me too!

(if you know, you know)

[-] XTL@sopuli.xyz 4 points 10 months ago

I remember there used to be Octobers.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

The Eternal September.

[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 28 points 10 months ago

I've seen countless palworld articles climb to the top of Google. They are awful... They don't even have correct information about the game. Google really is imploding before our eyes.

[-] Diurnambule@jlai.lu 13 points 10 months ago

Yeah agreed on that you can't Google thing anymore. People were speaking of enshitification, I was thinking they were exaggerating, but seing the results around palworld that crazy. Try to find a site with egg combination base don parents. Good luck I got a good one in page 4-5.

[-] LiamMayfair@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 10 months ago

I rely on Google Search far less now than I used to for this reason. People had already gotten Google SEO down to a science and were poisoning search results very effectively. This AI-generated bullshit is taking it to a whole new level.

I've decided to use alternative search engines like DDG, SearXNG, etc. hoping their indexing criteria will be different enough current SEO techniques won't affect them as much... For now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 2 points 10 months ago

The irony of some of the articles being clearly written by AI while also being about "Palword because someone said AI" is rich.

[-] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 26 points 10 months ago

Lately I've been seeing more ai articles and videos on youtube. Sometimes, I look up tech issues and there's a video, I check it out and some of these videos are just forum posts uploaded text on the screen. There are whole channels taking popular online forum posts and gathering views that way.

[-] Badeendje@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago

Yes, so annoying. You read an article and later find the (steam) forum, reddit post or tweet that was turned into a whole article, just with more words.

Don't even get me started on having to watch a 10 minute video on YouTube that could have been a 3 sentence forum post.

[-] GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk 8 points 10 months ago

Or something that could have been explained in 3 paragraphs becoming a 20 minute, overproduced video complete with someone making a stupid face in the thumbnail, and SOMETHING ALLCAPS in the title.

[-] Nommer@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago

What's really annoying is I'll search for something in DDG, Google, bing, etc, like palworld for example, and I'll see the top 10 results be different web pages with almost identical wording that don't even answer my questions. I hate the Internet these days. SEO and advertising is cancer that kills off anything good.

[-] Yewb@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

Who knew the black wall from cyberpunk would end up being real but with adds!

How long until we get internet 2.0 walled garden for humans?

[-] otp@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago

Seems like there are more minuses than adds

[-] jeena@jemmy.jeena.net 14 points 10 months ago

The irony of that this post is done by @L4s@lemmy.world

[-] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 18 points 10 months ago

Bots and AI aren't the same thing. Bots are just automations, not necessarily making use of machine learning.

[-] 9point6@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I saw someone unironically last month call Excel spreadsheet formulas "AI".

The term is rapidly approaching meaninglessness when used by anyone remotely non-technical. I'm probably going to miss an edge case here, but basically:

Classic AI = mostly search algorithms (Dijkstra, A*, etc), simple neural nets (e.g. perceptron) and prolog (to trivialise logic languages)

Modern AI = Machine Learning and the utilisation of those models trained by it. (Tensorflow, LLMs, etc)

Everything else = not AI, just technology.

[-] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 8 points 10 months ago

I would include "video game AI" since semantically it is pretty well-accepted, even though it's not really AI. Things like goal-based behaviour as well as the pathfinding algos you mentioned.

[-] 9point6@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

There's the edge case haha, yeah I agree, game AI is a pretty accepted and understood concept

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] xenoclast@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

Meh. Email was going to implode before someone came up with baysean filters and Gmail became a thing. Last time I checked (once in a blue moon), email still works.

Certainly 99.999% of SMTP traffic is garbage but my inbox is still usable.

[-] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 2 points 10 months ago

A web crawler is not comparable to an e-mail inbox.

[-] zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 10 months ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 6 points 10 months ago

So, someone can look at this festering putrid hellscape we call the internet in the past 5 years and still see a way down?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2024
315 points (95.1% liked)

Technology

59670 readers
2927 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS