219
If conservatives become convinced that they cannot win democratically, they will not abandon conservatism. They will reject democracy.
The truth is they haven't believed in democracy for a really long time.
Possibly ever.
- David Frum
I firmly believe they don't see voting as a way for a people to pick their representatives, but rather a way to test the loyalty of the population to their "Rightful Masters"
The fact that a Republican can lose an election is seen as a bug, not a feature.
Proposing something like that should automatically get you banned from all government jobs.
This really comes accross as a party that is beginning to realise it is in deep shit.
And their supporters will let it happen or cheer it on.
And their supporters will let it happen ~~or~~ and cheer it on.
Ftfy
To me it comes across as a party of actual fascists realising the jig is up, they’ve been spotted, and they can no longer sneak their fascism into democracy under the radar.
Historically, shit gets dangerous when this happens, because there’s often a latent 30% of society who’re actually fine with open fascism if they get what they personally want. Fascists are more than happy to weaponise that.
If it is put on the ballot, I really hope everyone shows up to vote it down.
Both sides are not the same. Trump is running for dictator. They don't care about who won the elections anymore. Republicans want to rule us from a minority.
It's legislation. The dem governor will veto it, and the courts would laugh at it.
Would the courts laugh at it? I believe it is up to the states to decide how they want to choose their electors, and it is just tradition that dictates they go to the popular vote. In fact, this is the way the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact is designed to get rid of the electoral college.
I would bet they WANT to courts to come in and decide that a state MUST deliver their delegates to the popular vote so that the NPVIC is dead in the water.
I hadn't realized how well the NPVIC was doing. It's currently at 205 Electoral votes with legislation pending in other states that would bring it past the 270 vote trigger that would end the Electoral Collage. In theory, if enough of the pending states come through before July, it could go into effect for this coming election. That is amazing!
Why even bother with an election at that point? It wouldn't make any difference because obviously they would overturn any results they don't like, even if they themselves were elected on the same ballot
That’s the point?
Precisely
Um. Please tell me this will never fly. Please. Someone. Pls….
Unless Arizona governors aren't allowed to veto, it'll never happen
They are and she’s a Dem so she will. Not sure on the lay of the land if it came to an override. Also AZ voters can, with enough signatures, get an item on the ballot bypassing the legislature. So even if it doesn’t go through there it could still end up on a ballot. But at least then in total we are skewing more blue than red.
All in all, very unlikely to see this happen.
I'm less concerned with the likelihood of such a bill passing than I am with the fact that Republicans are being this brazen about it.
If this initiative ended up on the ballot, no way would AZ voters vote for something that would kill their future ability to vote for a president.
AZ State legislature leans red, but not by nearly enough to overdrive their Dem governor's vetoes.
Republicans want to rule you and they are getting really bold about it. Ohio Republicans are doing the same.
You take my vote away and we’re going to have a problem. Ok republiQans? A. Problem.
You’ll find out how tolerant this left is.
Far as I have been able to tell there are two things stopping a good portion on the left from actually rioting:
-
Hope that voting will do what we need it to do
-
Lack of agreement on what to do
The third may be apathy, though that's been a constant, and basically a given at this point. I expect a loss of hope and general apathy over time if this went through. However, I also expect that the removal of 1 will cause 2 to no longer be an issue.
Who knows though.
If I can - in my sole judgement - safely cast a ballot and my wife can do the same, I’ll back down.
If however there are difficulties with that…. Just wait until you see what a liberal who believes in the Constitutiom and 2nd and 4th/5th handling that.
Wanna watch drop boxes w obscured tags? Yeah we can do that too, and report every instance of threats and violence.
I can’t do 24/7 anymore, but a lil vid while I nap seems totally reasonable.
"If conservatives ideals are rejected by the people Republicans will not abandon Conservativism, they will abandon democracy"
That guy looks like he just realized he left his dick at home.
Democrats are STEALING our Elections!
Every accusation is a confession
Lol, Arizona doesn't understand democracy. Can they succeed as well?
I know you meant secede but I'm imagining you are just a super positive person 😁
Oh Arizona... you don't need a law to do that.
Just ask Missouri. Those sacks have found ways to override constitutional amendments.
My god, someone tell this chud already that Trump isn't going to fuck him.
The thirst for Trump's dried shriveled aprocot dick by the right is way past creepy at this point.
this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2024
219 points (97.4% liked)
politics
19159 readers
4573 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS