191
submitted 2 years ago by ghostBones@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Justice comes calling for the fourth time this summer.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago

I'll believe that "justice comes calling" when he's wearing clothes that match his skin color (not his natural gray "corpse twice warmed over" pallor, the John Boehner tribute one).

Not saying that it's not good that they're trying, but since he's rich and powerful in an extremely corrupt system,actual justice for his many crimes will probably come in several years, if ever..

[-] mrbubblesort@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago

I understand your cynicism, but if there's a silver lining it's that this is a state level charge so he couldn't pardon himself or get it dismissed if he were to somehow win the election. So this trial gonna happen no matter what.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

I mostly agree, but then again, the risk of a Georgia judge being another Aileen Cannon is not insignificant, which could not just delay the trial but also unduly influence the outcome..

[-] REdOG@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

What's to stop Republicans from installing a governor and pardoning him at the state level?

[-] ozamataz@lemm.ee 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Georgia is one of five states where pardons come from an independent board and not the governor.

https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-georgia-indictment-pardon-board-2023-8

[-] ALilOff@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago

I could be remembering wrong entirely but, wasn’t Georgia and their government one of the main leading charges of making false election claims. So, they’ve now scapegoated themselves and pinning it on the Trump advisors.

Like “hey we only did this cause these advisors were the ones that motivated us to do this”

[-] onionbaggage@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 2 years ago

You did hear the call where Trump was literally telling the Governor to find him votes right?

[-] ghostBones@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yep, remembering wrong. Georgia was targeted because of a narrow race which made it a crucial battleground state. Why is that relevant? Well, it would not make sense to dispute the outcome in a state where it would not benefit. Qui bono. Who benefits? In this case, targeting Georgia would benefit Trump by being a bigger beneficial result, with the least amount of effort (easier to hide); because the vote count would be much closer. The legal question here is how did he try to win the benefit of victory in Georgia, after the election was over? Ex post facto means after the fact. Is there evidence that this effort was done in an illegal manner?

this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
191 points (98.5% liked)

News

36642 readers
555 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS