Thinking more on this, you don't need to even have autism or ADHD or any other form of diagnoseable neurodivergence. You could just be an introverted person who doesn't do well in such situations.

And then there's the nationality issue. Different nationalities and cultures have different body languages. It is disrespectful to make eye contact in Japan and expected in the U.S. So what does this AI do with a Japanese hiree?

Suddenly, viciously reminded of that quote: "If a machine cannot be held accountable, it cannot be allowed to make a management decision" (paraphrased)

...should prooooobably start legislating that shit

Just like return to office, relocations, and the overwhelming majority of performance metrics.

Cheap excuses for shit managers that can't or won't handle their employees (and firing of them) properly.

BTDT, and seen it a number of times with other tools.

Using an AI to grade someone's body language seems like a horrible thing.

Although I will say there is some validity to being careful about who you hire company culture wise and I'm not talking about race gender or disability.

We've turned down the 'best programmer' numerous times, some people that really had some solid skills, because they came in aggressive and brash.

The one guy got his "sorry but no thanks", said look at my resume I'm an absolute master at everything you do, and he wasn't kidding he was very good. We told him we recognize his skills but said that socially he was difficult and abrasive just in interviews and that there's no way that they could subject him to the rest of the company. He unleashed a string of profanities and said couldn't we just have him work somewhere else on his own separate projects. No, that wasn't going to be an option.

Nobody wants to hire somebody that's going to make a workplace toxic. That means that sometimes you turn down some of the better skilled opportunities, but you can always find somebody nicer and train/educate them.

As far as race, gender, quirks, we have you meet with everybody, a group takes you out to lunch. You can be shy, flighty, uncomfortable, awkward, the basic test is, can you mostly do the job and would other people want to work with you. And if the people come back with the answer of no, we don't bring you on. We've done that since the very beginning, so everybody there is already pretty much a tolerant nice person.

I had this one guy interview for my department, He made it through the morning interviews no problems. Gold star. The lunch crew took him out to lunch. He turned it into a people watching affair and started making horrible comments about all the people coming in the door. One of the strongest personalities I know was the lunch came back to me and said he makes me very uncomfortable. I sent him packing.

I hope we don't get to the point where all jobs are using AI to weed people out without humans checking behind it.

Funny. That sounds exactly like how they tried to use "intelligence tests" to prevent Black people from voting. The questions didn't explicitly exclude Black people, but we're written in a vague and subjective way so that the test-giver could claim that any answer was right/wrong and thereby exclude anyone they wanted.

This is lemmy's, sir.