668
submitted 1 year ago by livus@kbin.social to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

A joint U.S.-Mexico topographical survey found that 787 feet of the 995-feet-long buoy line set up by Texas are in Mexico.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] venusenvy47@lemm.ee 183 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sounds like Mexico can just take down most of this thing.

Edit: As a US citizen, I support Mexico's immigration services to detain any Texas construction workers that illegally cross the border to service this thing.

I also would support the governor of this region of Mexico to put these construction workers on a bus and drop them deep in the heart of Mexico somewhere.

[-] comedy@kbin.social 91 points 1 year ago

They should. Send Abbott a bill for polluting their waterway too, while they're at it.

[-] venusenvy47@lemm.ee 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Probably the only reason Mexico hasn't already pulled it out is because they don't want to waste money that they know will never be reimbursed to them.

Maybe the US will take it down and bill Texas themselves.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] wheresmypillow@lemmy.one 104 points 1 year ago

Every state’s geography has different challenges. Texas is blessed with natural resources and rich farmland. It is a rich state. Spending that money on murder buoys instead of immigration services is a crime against humanity.

[-] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 57 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

LOL CBS! There is no such thing as "technically" in Mexico. The barrier is in Mexico and Mexican authorities should just cut it up and remove it.

[-] stu@lemmy.pit.ninja 27 points 1 year ago

And make America pay for it! That'd make me laugh every time I think about it for now and forever after Donald Trump tried to get Mexico to pay for his dumb fucking wall.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] poprocks@beehaw.org 31 points 1 year ago

They should sell it back to Texas at a huge markup. Then when it floats back over to their waters, sell it back again, and again, and again. Endless money stream.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

Can we just wall off Texas at this point? Let them have their own shitty country

[-] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago

Let's give it back to Mexico, the Republicans were screaming that we should let Russia have Ukraine because it used to be part of Russia, and as it turns out Texas used to be part of Mexico. Problem solved.

[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

Throw in Florida as a tip.

[-] Kungolicious@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

Damn, you really hate Mexicans don’t you?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] GlendatheGayWitch@lib.lgbt 21 points 1 year ago

I thought that the treaty from the Spanish-American War made the Rio Grande neutral territory. Any land that appears in the middle of the river doesn't belong to either country.

Unless there have been other treaties that I didn't learn about in my history classes, the buoys technically are infringement on neutral territory.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] rgb3x3@beehaw.org 14 points 1 year ago

US: "Everything on this side of the line is ours, those are the rules."

Mexico: "But you can't keep moving the line into my side, that's not fair!"

US "Yeah huh, mom said that's how it works."

Mexico: "No she didn't! You're lying!"

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 13 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Nearly 80% of the controversial floating barrier Texas state officials assembled in the middle of the Rio Grande to deter migrant crossings is technically on the Mexican side of the U.S.-Mexico border, according to a federal government survey released on Tuesday.

The river barrier, assembled near the Texas border town of Eagle Pass, has come under national and international scrutiny, including from the Mexican government, which has strongly voiced its objections to the buoys.

But Steve McCraw, director of the Texas Department of Public Safety, said preliminary information indicated that the first person found dead had "drowned upstream from the marine barrier and floated into the buoys."

Abbott and other Texas officials have insisted the buoys are necessary to stop migrants from entering the U.S. illegally, and the state has refuted claims it violated federal law and international treaties when it set up the floating barriers without permission from the Biden administration or Mexico.

The survey could add a new legal dimension to the Biden administration lawsuit, which argues that Texas violated a longstanding law governing navigable U.S. waterways when it set up the buoys without federal permission.

Unlawful crossings along the southern border fell to the lowest level in two years in June, a drop the Biden administration attributed to a set of asylum restrictions and programs that allow migrants to enter the U.S. legally.


I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
668 points (98.0% liked)

World News

32352 readers
467 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS