-50
submitted 9 months ago by ira@lemmy.ml to c/politics@lemmy.world
all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] aseriesoftubes@lemmy.world 27 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

“He did not remember when he was vice president, forgetting on the first day of the interview when his term ended (‘if it was 2013 — when did I stop being Vice President?’)

This was a five-hour interview the day after the October 7 attack in Israel. He was thinking about a brewing war in the Middle East and couldn’t recall a date. He also strikes me as the kind of person who thinks about things like this out loud. It doesn’t necessarily mean he didn’t know, just that he was processing it externally.

“He did not remember, even within several years, when his son Beau died.”

OK, fuck, that’s not great. Then again, I’m 40 years younger than him and I can’t tell you the exact dates when important people in my life died.

[-] rdyoung@lemmy.world 21 points 9 months ago

This right here. I'm 43 and don't remember birthdays or death days for most of my family. I also have to think things through to remember at times. I also have problems recalling specific words at random ass times, for example I wouldn't be able to bring up the word "table" but could tell you about fermis paradox, another time it would be "sidewalk" that my brain could be assed to remember.

Biden is old and should be retired somewhere on the beach. He chose to run again because he knew we needed to get rid of trump, remember that, he chose to run again. Now he is the only thing standing between democracy and another large step into fascism with a future dictator.

[-] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 9 months ago

Some days ago I was asked how old I was and I had to seriously think about it for some seconds. Some things are important to me, some aren't. Some memories are easy to access and others might be buried below grief and years of just not thinking about them.

And you're right. He's probably not running for himself but to keep that orange douche out. And that's a good thing.

[-] rdyoung@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Exactly. That's my point. He deserves our thanks and appreciation not our ire and constant judging of everything he does. I would take Biden drooling and staring off into space over anything the right has offered over the past few decades.

Even if Bidens 2nd term does nothing to move us forward that's better than moving backwards under trump or whoever putin wants installed as king.

[-] osarusan@kbin.social 5 points 9 months ago

“He did not remember, even within several years, when his son Beau died.”

This one just pisses me off. It's framed so dishonestly.

I can recall extremely specific things about when people I know died. What the weather was, what I was wearing, what video game I was playing when I heard the news, and so on. But I couldn't necessarily pull the right year out of my brain without checking. Or necessarily even the date for some people.

I promise that Biden remembers the death of his son in whatever specific way is meaningful to him. It might not be "on this day/month/year." It might be "on a Tuesday" or might be "a cold snowy day when I was baking bread." I have no idea. But this just isn't how memory works, and it's hurtful, evil even, to print something that dishonest. It boils my blood to read such dishonest reporting.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

Hey - AP News - where’s the shocking exposé that Trump is a demented, convicted fraud and rapist who organized a coup the last time you gave him a four year free ride without ONCE calling him a liar, or definitely guilty of collusion or violating emoluments or anything of the kind? Hm? WHERE IS THAT COMMON SENSE REPORTING WE’VE BEEN DOING FOR YOU FOR EIGHT YEARS.

Fucking Biden can’t remember things. You fucks. You republiQan-owned turd factory. Get the fuck outta here with your bullshit horserace clickbait. God damn you.

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 4 points 9 months ago

Well, that's not great.

Hur is Republican, but he doesn't have anything really egregious in his past to suggest he's a hardcore ideologue. But man does it sound like that report was constructed for political purposes. On the other hand, those are direct quotes, and lying about that would be a significantly worse act than trying to describe the president unkindly. And if he were a regular suspect, saying he's a kindly old man with memory problems wouldn't really be inappropriate, and would be relevant for whether he should be held culpable, so I guess it's plausible Hur's trying to be objective.

[-] ira@lemmy.ml -3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Hur was appointed as special counsel by Garland who was appointed by Biden.

[-] cranakis@reddthat.com 6 points 9 months ago

Hur is a Republican. Garland picked him to pacify the Republicans. His opinion of Biden doesn't mean anything to me.

[-] ira@lemmy.ml 0 points 9 months ago

On a scale of 1-10 how pacified would you say Republicans are right now?

[-] cranakis@reddthat.com 2 points 9 months ago

That was a stupid thing for Garland to do. Not defending that. Nothing pacifies Republicans.

[-] ira@lemmy.ml 0 points 9 months ago

This whole thing is McGovern 2.0. Biden is self-destructing his own candidacy in spectacular fashion. It's going to be a disaster in November if Democrats don't do something drastic to turn things around.

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 3 points 9 months ago

I don't get what you're trying to say here. Being appointed by Merrick Garland doesn't make him not a Republican or definitely not a ideologue. Centrist Democrats love picking conservatives for positions because it will demonstrate how enlightened they are and definitely (100%, for sure) defuse any criticism that an acquittal was political.

[-] ira@lemmy.ml -4 points 9 months ago

So the Biden administration is appointing fascist sympathizers to highly sensitive positions?

If there's a fascist at the table...

[-] ira@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago

MBFC rating for AP News:

Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER

Factual Reporting: HIGH

MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


WASHINGTON (AP) — The longstanding concerns about President Joe Biden’s age and memory intensified on Thursday after the release of a special counsel’s report investigating his possession of classified documents.

The White House pushed back on the characterizations of Biden’s memory in a Feb. 5 letter from the president’s lawyers that was published in special counsel Robert Hur’s report.

Biden noted in a statement issued Thursday that he had sat for five hours of interviews with Hur’s team over two days on Oct. 8 and 9, “even though Israel had just been attacked on October 7th and I was in the middle of handling an international crisis.”

The release of the report overlapped with recent Biden speeches in which he mistakenly claimed to talk with European leaders — France’s Francois Mitterand and Germany’s Helmut Kohl — who had, in fact, not held office since the 1990s and had died several years ago.

Joe Biden is unfit to lead this nation,” said Alex Pfeiffer, a spokesman for Make America Great Again Inc., the main super PAC backing Trump’s candidacy.

Shortly before the special counsel’s report was publicly released, White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre was playing down Biden’s gaffes at the daily news briefing.


The original article contains 926 words, the summary contains 203 words. Saved 78%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world -5 points 9 months ago

Seems like the Democrats want Trump in the office in 2024, running Genocide Joe instead of getting someone younger or just slightly better...

In an August poll by The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs, 77% of U.S. adults said Biden is too old to be effective for four more years. It was one of the rare sources of bipartisan agreement during a politically polarized era, with 89% of Republicans and 69% of Democrats saying Biden’s age is a problem.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

You do know Trump is only 3 years younger than Biden, right?

[-] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world -4 points 9 months ago

Yes, I knew they were close in age.

The people think it is an age problem, when it is really a mental health problem.

Donald was Born: Donald John Trump, June 14, 1946, Queens, New York City, U.S.; Age: 77 years

Joe was Born: Joseph Robinette Biden Jr, November 20, 1942, Scranton, Pennsylvania, U.S.; Age: 81 years

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

So you're saying Donald Trump is mentally healthy?

[-] Alto@kbin.social 4 points 9 months ago

Obviously, he knows what a whale is!

[-] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world -5 points 9 months ago

I am not a fan of Donald or Joe.

It just seems one of them has more mental health problems than the other.

They should both be retired and enjoy their vast wealth while they can...

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

It just seems one of them has more mental health problems than the other.

Yes. Trump. Very clearly.

[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

It just seems one of them has more mental health problems than the other.

Yes. The one who:

has Confused Nikki Haley for Nancy Pelosi

thinks that Obama is the current president

thinks he beat both Bush and Obama in elections

has on multiple occasions bragged about acing a "difficult" cognitive tests that doctors say are simple for people with normal function. As one doctor put it, “It’s a very, very low bar for somebody who carries the nuclear launch codes in their pocket to pass and certainly nothing to brag about.”

And this is just sample of the recent stuff. Would you like to go back to the time period where he was suggesting that people inject bleach to protect themselves from COVID?

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

Buy stock in alcohol. This campaign season and the debates… whew, it’s gonna be… something.

[-] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world -3 points 9 months ago

Yes, they will be way more interesting!

this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024
-50 points (24.5% liked)

politics

19148 readers
1835 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS