426
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

More 128TB SSDs are coming as almost no one noticed this launch — another SSD controller that can support up to 128TB appeared paving the way for HDD-beating capacities::Phison quietly revealed an updated X2 SSD platform at CES

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] db2@lemmy.world 146 points 1 year ago

as almost no one noticed this launch

That's because we're having trouble just getting food. A shiny new and expensive SSD isn't even on the list at this point.

[-] greybeard@lemmy.one 55 points 1 year ago

At that size they are certainly targeting enterprise and cloud servers. Cool that they are getting that big, but they probably cost as much as a house.

At that size they are certainly targeting enterprise and cloud servers

Dunno, have you seen the new Medal of Honor?

[-] WarshipJesus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I haven't. Was it just announced? I loved that series as a kid.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 52 points 1 year ago

I read 128GB SSDs and thought "who cares"

impressive.

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 47 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That’s cool and all, but the only reason I would want that capacity is to store stuff that I would want to store for much longer than a lifespan of an SSD. Only HDD’s have that kind of lifespan. Like a gigantic video library/archive. I guess these aren’t for me.

But if they drive down the price of high capacity, HDDs, all the better. 

[-] falkerie71@sh.itjust.works 43 points 1 year ago

Correct me if I'm wrong here, but I remember that SSDs lifespan mainly depends on how much you overwrite the drive. For 128TB, it should take you a very long time to overwrite the entire drive, let alone couple hundred or thousand times to kill the drive. I know that bit rot also happens on SSDs, but that applies to HDDs as well, and good drive maintenance practices should alleviate the issue. Though for archival purposes/cold storage, tape drives are probably better.

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

The lifespan of your data isn't nearly as long as the lifespan of the cells storing your data. Due to leakage of of power from the cells, and the more and more dense these cells are being packed (leading to smaller differences between what voltage maps to what binary value), SSDs have issues with bitrot. With a disk this size you would need to have data regularly checked and refreshed (rewritten) to ensure the data being stored was still correct and not corrupted.

[-] linearchaos@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

All storage has issues with bit rot. There haven't been any studies to show that SSD is disproportionately affected.

[-] blurg@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

In 2016, HDDs were more reliable (MTBF).

In 2022, for the first 5 years, SSDs are looking more reliable. With more of a constant failure rate (1%/yr), than the increasing failure rate of HDDs after 5 years.

(Caveat: not just bit rot, but general failure data.)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ridethisbike@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago
[-] Plopp@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

When bits of data on a storage medium goes bad for seemingly no reason. If you've ever had a library of files and all of a sudden there's a file that won't open even though you haven't touched it.

[-] grte@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago

If they are loading the drive up with media for archival purposes how much overwriting are they going to be doing, anyways? Theoretically the drive should last a very long time for that purpose.

[-] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Right, but if the point isn't for the drive to be actively used, and instead just hold data for archiving, then there's little reason to spend more money to get an SDD for that purpose when an HDD will hold that data just as well and for much cheaper.

The benefits of SSD over HDD are almost entirely in performance, so if SSD can develop further to provide a tangible benefit over HDD for long term storage, and do it for cheaper, then we can fully move away from it. But I don't think we're quite there yet.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ANIMATEK@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

It’s not for you. It’s for enterprises, but I can drive down the prices of shit you would use. No noise, better performance, less energy; it’s a win-win.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

HDDs typically don’t last as long as SSDs due to their mechanics failing. Data is there but it just won’t spin. I’ve yet to have an SSD actually fail. Every HDD I’ve ever owned, save one, has.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] LightDelaBlue@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago

I care about affordable stuf not luxury .

[-] lud@lemm.ee 40 points 1 year ago

These are not intended for you anyways. They are designed for servers.

It's still interesting though and server hardware eventually makes it way down to normal people.

I’m holding out upgrading for the holographic nano dark matter drives that have infinite storage capacity and RAID data into 3 alternate universes for security.

[-] archchan@lemmy.ml 33 points 1 year ago

Some high tech alien's porn stash is embedded in the fabric of our universe and that's the reason we exist.

[-] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Are we the porn? Some alien's weird fetish?

[-] helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

If we are, the story's gone to shit.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

This is why I feel like an interdimensional cumshot all the time.

[-] KingofHearts615@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Damn, Interdimensional cumshot sounds like an obscure metal band.

[-] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 year ago

I may have just jizzed in my pants

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 57 points 1 year ago

Maybe the price will dry you off.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HeavyDogFeet@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

Realistically, a couple of 10TB drives would have me covered for like a decade at least. If these massive drives bring down the price of much smaller ones, I'm a happy boy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] randomaside@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 1 year ago

That's some nice density you got there. While you're at it...

Can I get a 12.8TB drive 1/10th the physical size (m.2 2230) and has a steady transfer rate of 2.4GBs that costs <$200 dollhairs? Pretty please 🙏

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago

How expensive are they, $100,000 or maybe more?

[-] Abird1620@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

$4.5k from a quick search.

Edit: I HAVE NO CLUE WHERE THAT NUMBER CAME FROM LAST NIGHT

https://www.tomshardware.com/news/samsung-128tb-petabyte-storage

This states that a 32tb ssd costs roughly $7000

[-] cordlesslamp@lemmy.today 17 points 1 year ago

≈$35/TB or ≈3.4¢/GB Actually not a bad deal at all, consider the current SSD prices.

[-] BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

That's actually pretty reasonable.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 7 points 1 year ago

I'm going to need a source for that, as it's well below even regular consumer SSDs.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] D_Air1@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

Still can't afford it.

[-] Harbinger01173430@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Do you think the normal consumer would care? All that matters is for SSD to become as cheap or cheaper than HDDs or nothing

[-] frezik@midwest.social 8 points 1 year ago

Capacity that high is for servers.

[-] Eezyville@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago
[-] Raab@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Servers full of porn

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] csm10495@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

What's the biggest HDD out there? I mean at sizes this big it's a lot of data to lose in one go if it dies. Even if you have backups or whatever that's a lot to have to restore.

[-] QuadratureSurfer@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Are we including magnetic tape?

Looks like they hit 580 TB a few years ago: https://www.pcmag.com/news/fujifilm-and-ibm-set-world-record-with-580tb-magnetic-tapes

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] jenny_ball@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2024
426 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

69112 readers
2382 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS