86
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 89 points 7 months ago

I'll believe it when I see it.

Motherfucker didn't even get in trouble covering up multiple rapes.

[-] Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

when you're a star, they let you do it. You can do anything.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

Birds of a feather...

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Is that true though? Could you, I dunno...maybe like...grab 'em by the pussy?

[-] normanwall@lemmy.world 63 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Lol, this guy Alexander Smirnov is going to get on a fucking boat and sail away, he's a flight risk and he'll end up back in Israel.

He's an ex-FBI informant that has been accused of ties to Russian spies, and has been successfully spreading these stories across conservative media in America, sowing more chaos and creating division while smarmy fucks like Sean Hannity thrive on repeating the lies.

Putin will give this guy a reward like he did to Maria Butina after she compromised the NRA and the Republicans.

The justice department says that he disclosed his intelligence contacts to his FBI handler, saying he could use those connections - which prosecutors described as " extensive and extremely recent" - to leave the US.

https://news.yahoo.com/alexander-smirnov-fbi-source-accused-234853250.html

Gym Jordan will ultimately end up with a slap on the wrist after it's determined that this was Russian propaganda.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 22 points 7 months ago

Funny how all of these people are allowed to go back to Russia or Israel while Assange (yes, I know he's a piece of shit, but that's beside the point) wasn't allowed to go to Ecuador.

[-] SamsonSeinfelder@feddit.de 22 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

"may"... that guy and half the republicans are foreign agents. Some paid, some just as usefull idiots.

[-] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago

"We have determined that the whistleblower is extremely credible" - James Comer, Fox interview

[-] Jaderick@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago

What kind of news site uses a pre-law student at a university for a quote? Article was alright until that point. That’s some Fox News level garbage.

[-] lettruthout@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

That and doxing a national security journalist. Newsweek used to be considered a decent news source.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 7 points 7 months ago

Newsweek has been on a right-wing bent for a while. Has to do with its more recent owners.

It's barely better than Fox News, now, and about on par with The Hill.

[-] aniki@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

No! Not the Pre-Laws! - No one, ever.

[-] Fapper_McFapper@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago

It’s Gym Jordan to you plebes.

[-] PhAzE@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 months ago

Exercise Jordan

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 6 points 7 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Ohio congressman Jim Jordan could face major repercussions over the Republican attempt to impeach Joe Biden after a former FBI informant charged with making false bribery claims against the president was accused of using Russian intelligence, legal experts suggest.

The highly disputed claims that Biden financially benefited from his son's foreign business dealings while he was vice president, including accusations of taking bribes, have been cited by House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jordan and other Republican figures in their impeachment proceedings.

A number of legal experts and Democratic figures have now suggested Jordan and other Republicans could face consequences if it is found Russian intelligence was the source of the alleged false bribery claims they said justified the impeachment of Biden.

Maryland rep. Jamie Raskin, the top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, had previously called on the GOP to drop their impeachment case against Biden following news of Smirnov's indictment for allegedly lying about the bribery claim.

The court filings about Smirnov's apparent dealings with Russian intelligence officials were submitted as the government tried to argue he should remain in custody following his arrest on February 14 at Harry Reid International Airport in Las Vegas, Nevada.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Daniel Albregts allowed Smirnov to be freed from custody on Tuesday with pre-trial conditions, including that he must remain in Nevada's Clarke County and that he must not try to apply for a new Israeli passport after volunteering to hand his current one over to authorities.


The original article contains 681 words, the summary contains 245 words. Saved 64%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

The republican traitor filth must be crushed under the heel of justice.

this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2024
86 points (88.4% liked)

politics

18870 readers
3857 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS