209
submitted 1 year ago by misk@sopuli.xyz to c/europe@feddit.de
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 27 points 1 year ago

It's pretty crazy that it was just flying there alone with apparently zero fighter jets accompanying it. AWACS are like aircraft carriers. They're never supposed to be alone. In the video you can see that it was deploying flares for minutes before the impact. They were probably tracking the missiles since they were fired and there was plenty of time react but all they could do is just hope for the best.

[-] JustUseMint@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I wanted to continue off of your well* written comment.

These planes are damn near irreplaceable for RU, they require very advanced electronics and sensitive equipment. They already had a very limited number of these planes in service, nevermind actually capable of doing their actual jobs. They are invaluable so far as providing top down radar of a battlefield for RU, and this is a massive, massive loss. Absolutely wreckless for this type of craft to not have a fighter wing with them.

Amazing job UA.

Edit: I a word

[-] EinfachUnersetzlich@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago

I'd argue that in this case it was reckless, but very wreckful.

[-] fne8w2ah@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Damn that's a rare piece of good news for UA.

[-] anlumo@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

I think there usually are also a few pretty important high-ranking generals on those planes.

[-] derGottesknecht@feddit.de 14 points 1 year ago

Not really generals, but specialiced and valuable operators which are also very hard to replace.

[-] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 1 points 1 year ago

The Russians have shitty air doctrine and they always have.

[-] Kissaki@feddit.de 24 points 1 year ago

AWACS stands for Airborne Warning & Control System (AWACS)

[-] ladicius@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Good. Now kill the rest.

[-] normanwall@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

It’s such a shame (that they haven’t shot down more)

[-] awwwyissss@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

So, approximately $1,000,000,000 worth of terrorist Kremlin jets taken down in the last few weeks.

[-] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Sorry to be a downer (no pun intended) but the news of Russian high value equipment being lost does not translate to victory in battlefields that is being sought after more by the public. The Ukrainians just lost Avdiivka (in part thanks to Republican stonewalling aid package to Ukraine) and there is reports of armoured assaults in Robotyne, a major village which Ukraine retook in their last counteroffensive.

Russia is willing to take more losses, because unfortunately the Russians are too steeped into Putin's propaganda.

[-] anlumo@feddit.de 12 points 1 year ago

This isn't about winning any particular battle, but to weaken Russia's awareness of the battlefields all over Ukraine. It's a slow-boiling long-term success.

[-] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Public morale and perception is as important. If Western public feels that results are not worth the money, they will demand or elect politicians who will withdraw support to Ukraine. American public perception is the major reason why US withdrew from Vietnam after all, in spite of body count that Pentagon touted. This is propaganda war as much as martial.

[-] Badeendje@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ukraine has been targeting Russia's radar and early warning capabilities, allowing them to fly drones into occupied territory and into Russia proper to hit high value military targets, refineries, factories and more.

The A50 was in part to coordinate airstrikes on the front, and in part to fill the radar gap.

Now the gap needs re-filling... Again...

In the mean time, refineries and fuel depots burn, airfields get hit, ships get sunk. It's getting harder every day.. for both sides.. but the loss rate for Russia is only sustainable as long as their enormous reserves last... But they are dwindling...

This is the attritional warfare Zalushni was talking about. It's like 2 boxers beating the crap out of each other untill one has had enough, can't raise his arms anymore, or goes KO. And neither is KO just yet.

[-] crazyCat@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago

They got those F16s yet? Hope so. Slavi Ukraini

[-] petrescatraian@libranet.de 5 points 1 year ago

@crazyCat I think they're still training on them.

@misk

[-] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

That's what, 2/4, 3/5? A major blow regardless. Seems like UA is slowly blinding their enemy...

[-] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Feels like the US is maybe sharing more intel now to try to make up for the lack of material support.

this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2024
209 points (97.7% liked)

Europe

8326 readers
2 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS