4
all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ptz@dubvee.org 33 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Real problem or election year "problem"?

Cause that migrant caravan that was going to sneak into our houses at night and smash up the place just kind of fizzled out immediately after the last election was over.

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 24 points 8 months ago

Not even a problem.

Most studies of undocumented immigrants have them committing fewer crimes than the average US citizen. Most are beneficial to the economy because they get less out of taxes than they pay in through payroll taxes due to not being eligible for many government services.

The only problem is how horrendous our immigration policies are that people feel the need to sneak in because the actual system for amnesty and becoming a citizen are so ridiculously complex and slow that risking their lives seems like a better option.

Funding the agencies that process immigration and ditching the ridiculously low caps on how many people can immigrate each year would be an actual solution.

[-] Candelestine@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

Like most propaganda, it has both truth and gross exaggeration in it.

The true part is the asylum process does get abused, which results in extremely long wait-times for asylum requests, and an overall stressing of the system.

The false parts are the normal Fox News propaganda lines. Way more of them than there actually are, it's an "invasion", they want to replace you, etc etc etc. Be afraid, be afraid, be afraid. Oh, and give our guys money.

[-] AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml 17 points 8 months ago

I'm unclear: Why is immigration a problem???

[-] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

In America, the core problem is mostly racial hysteria driven by conservative media. No one in MAGA world even talks about the 271,000+ Ukrainian refugees.

The other component is that the process at the Southern border is underfunded and has been for decades. There’s no appetite to fix it in Washington and there hasn’t been for my entire adult life. Both sides use it as a bargaining chip and then it inevitably becomes a campaign issue where compromise is impossible.

So, whereas a situation like more organized refugee resettlement allows — actually requires — the refugees to find work and housing (usually) within 6 months, even people obviously fleeing violence entering from the South have to go through an interminable and labyrinthian legal process to prove they aren’t secretly economic migrants.

If we had a functioning legal immigration system, this wouldn’t be an issue. If we had enough judges and facilities at the southern border to process asylum requests in a timely fashion, this wouldn’t be an issue. But to many in Congress, a “crisis” at the border is more valuable as something to demagogue than solving problems. (That was most evident recently when Republicans insisted border funding be tied to Ukraine aid and then reneged on the deal because — and they were quite open about this — Trump wants to campaign on immigration and they don’t want Biden to have an election year victory.)

[-] JeromeVancouver@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 months ago

I doubt the same thing is happening in the US, but in Canada immigration is definitely an election issue.

Building homes, schools and hospitals has not kept up with our immigration levels. Our homeless incampments are growing larger, more students than ever are in portables and wait times for the ER and surgeries keep growing.

[-] DarkGamer@kbin.social 16 points 8 months ago

Republicans during an election year and stoking xenophobia, like peas and carrots.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago

Well, they can say it's a problem but...

Immigration has propelled the U.S. job market further than just about anyone expected, helping cement the country’s economic rebound from the pandemic as the most robust in the world,” the Washington Post reports.

“That momentum picked up aggressively over the past year. About 50 percent of the labor market’s extraordinary recent growth came from foreign-born workers between January 2023 and January 2024, according to an Economic Policy Institute analysis of federal data. And even before that, by the middle of 2022, the foreign-born labor force had grown so fast that it closed the labor force gap created by the pandemic, according to research from the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2024/02/27/economy-immigration-border-biden/

[-] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Remember, it's an election year. So we got to talk about immigration to scare people into voting Republican and then immediately forget about it after the election.

Immigration only ever seems to be a concern when they're running for office. And they've already shown that they have no interest in actually fixing the 'issue.'

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Okay, so how many people do you think were surveyed to prepare this sizzling turgid article headline?

10,000? 50,000? More? Less? 5,000?

The answer is: .00006% of registered voters who have a telephone and answer their telephone for people they don't know.

Just those last two parts should make you wonder who they're really polling and what the likely outcome is obviously going to be.

Interestingly, this is the same percentage as voter fraud experts imagine there actually exists in a given election. Or, one person per state every six or seven years.

That's relevant because this is a kind of "voter fraud" where voters are "informed" of a scary thing by "numbers" from "polls" but it's really a thousand old people who want to spend 15 minutes on the phone with a telemarketer about their political views. How much did that cost the conservative PAC that funded it? Eh, $30k? For a headline in a respectable paper like the Gruandia? That's money well spent in an election year.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Buried the lede:

Congress’ job approval rating has fallen to 12%.

this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2024
4 points (56.2% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2003 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS