292
submitted 9 months ago by Wilshire@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 94 points 9 months ago

.. and as the article fails to mention.. what about the bloody TREES!? Imagine scammers cutting down a century-old, beautiful tree just to make a few hundred dollars. What a scummy, short-term, selfish thing to do. GRRRR.

Stories like this make me consider that humans deserve to go extinct. Maybe raccoons and corvids will do a better job of caring for this planet.

[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 30 points 9 months ago

If they actually cut them down, could you invoke TREE LAW? Wrongfully cutting down trees can lead to massive fines in the US, since they are so hard to replace.

[-] bob_lemon@feddit.de 27 points 9 months ago

Especially since you could pull this scam with a whole lot of other businesses that wold not result in cutting down trees.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago

Your mistake is thinking that scammers care about those things.

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 12 points 9 months ago

Oh they do. This is one of the most common types of scams out there. It sucked that I technically had to participate in many attempts at these because I worked as a relay operator prior to there being rules allowing us to disconnect obvious scammers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Thief_of_Crows@lemmy.ml 12 points 9 months ago

Raccoons and corvids? What, in the 30 minutes after they defeated the crabs, but before they evolved into crabs themselves?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Once everything evolves into crabs, we'll be doing a lot better on this planet.

That's apparently our benevolent creator's plan.

[-] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

slowly lifts Old Bay from under the bar

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] dave@feddit.uk 91 points 9 months ago

Those guys are amateurs. Try being the Uk government—compulsorily purchase private land for new rail line, hand lucrative contracts to your mates to clear mature oaks (which they get to keep, worth £5k each), accidentally clear more than is needed, then cancel the rail line.

[-] perviouslyiner@lemmy.world 33 points 9 months ago

Or Sheffield council and Amey cutting down healthy trees because they thought it would generate more profit in the street maintenance contract.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 21 points 9 months ago

I doubt I've ever seen a farce as big as the east leg of HS2.

It's linking London and Leeds. No, it's linking London and a tram stop 10 miles outside Nottingham. No, it's linking London to the ruins of the last coal power station in Britain, and a bus stop to East Midlands Airport for some reason, even though London has like 4 fucking airports anyway and they all go to the same shithole cheap Euro dumps that EMA flies to. Ah you know what fuck it, you're not getting HS2 at all.

[-] sukhmel@programming.dev 8 points 9 months ago

Shīt, that hurts me even reading this 😭

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social 84 points 9 months ago

Why are Americans still dealing with checks in the age of digital banking?

[-] Aliendelarge@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago

That same scam is also ran on every other payment method. These would all be prevented by not accepting checks that aren't for the exact amount and don't pay the difference in cash to the check writer.

[-] qisope@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

One reason is to avoid card transaction fees. For smaller companies providing often expensive services, like tree felling, they'll pass on the card transaction fee to the client or recommend they just pay by check to avoid it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Zess@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Boomer contractors who can't figure out how to take a payment on a mobile device.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Because the US detests change of any form, even if it will make things better.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

I haven't had a checkbook in a long time.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Tinks@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

I still have to have a checkbook because my dog groomer and my tree trimmer/gutter cleaner companies both refuse to accept cards. They are small businesses and don't want to deal with the fees. My options are go get cash every time, or keep a checkbook on hand to write checks. While I understand their reasoning, it's infuriating that checks even still exist.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (30 replies)
[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 61 points 9 months ago

This story makes me excited for the day we might someday have a tree-law or perhaps even bird-law sublemmy of our own.

Someday perhaps.

[-] Notyourbusiness@lemmy.ca 18 points 9 months ago

Tree law is a thing, there are big lawsuits in the states over trees.

[-] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

The Japanese government recently arrested members of a big auto dealership for allegedly killings a few trees in front of their buildings.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] gbuttersnaps@programming.dev 9 points 9 months ago

Tree law was one of the few subreddits that I would actually read everytime I saw a post pop up in my feed. Something so satisfying about a good case of tree law.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Xeroxchasechase@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

Or a scam-law...

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] mwproductions@lemmy.world 52 points 9 months ago

The scam in question, from the article:

McKcraken said he never requested a tree removal service and didn’t want any trees at his Forest Hills house — which he’s trying to sell — removed.

“They’re trying to target vacant houses because the owners won’t know,” he said. “So that they can post themselves as the owner, and the owners won’t be home to stop it and won’t be home to notice it if the tree services do show up.”

The Wilson County Sheriff’s Office said the scheme begins with a scammer calling or emailing a tree service company for a quote on how much it would be to cut down trees. After receiving an estimated amount, they send the company a faulty check for more than needed.

Before the company realizes the checks are null and void, the scammer asks the company to pay back the difference.

“They send you a check for $1,500, and they want you to send $500 back to them,” Adam Barbee with Arbor Sense said. “And then that way, they take $500, and you try to go cash the check, and the check is no good.”

[-] lonerangers1@lemmy.world 84 points 9 months ago

“They send you a check for $1,500, and they want you to send $500 back to them,” Adam Barbee with Arbor Sense said. “And then that way, they take $500, and you try to go cash the check, and the check is no good.”

If someone sends me a check for $500 more than they should have, I would just have them send me another and void the incorrect one. Checks that don't match invoices make for sloppy books.

[-] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 5 points 8 months ago

And oddly the only way to buy weed on plastic around here (legally) is for you to use a debit card, which they round up to the next $5 and give you back the change (which most usually ends up in the budtenders tip jar anyway).

It’s because the way the law is written, it’s actually processed as an ATM transaction.

Obviously this is a legal loophole, but there are legitimate reasons to extract more than necessary.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] SeabassDan@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Makes you wonder why so many are willing to just send some money back.

[-] zourn@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Usually they camp it in language where they are only able to cut one check (company policy of one check per PO, for example), but they need to pay two people, you and another facilitator such as a transport service. The extra money is to pay for the transport service, which is actually also the scammer.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 35 points 9 months ago

That is like, actually one of the oldest scams in the book. I'm impressed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] maness300@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

That's a pretty interesting scam.

[-] Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works 17 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

People have been doing similar scam on used car sellers for years.

Example being I post a car for sale. Scammer offers to buy. Scammer brings check higher than the agreed price. Tells me I can deposit the whole check, just give them difference back in cash. Scammer leaves with that cash and the car. Few days later bank tells me the check was no good.

Used to hear about that often enough Craigslist even sent out warnings to sellers.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 26 points 9 months ago

I dunno, if you cut someone's tree down, you're responsible--even if you thought you had permission.

[-] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 20 points 9 months ago

And the tree's owner can sue you for comically large amounts of money. Ye olde r/bestoflegaladvice actually had to ban tree law posts for much the same reason that r/nocontext had to ban content from r/crusaderkings.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Yeah I was thinking about tree law lol lol

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 24 points 9 months ago

Jesus fuck. The scammers are bad enough, but the businesses that don't recognize the obvious overpayment scam should be somewhat liable. These types of overpayment scams are so common, so well-known, and so blatantly obvious I really have no sympathy for idiots who fall for them.

[-] Kiernian@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

I have yet to run into a single company who's AP/AR departments aren't either overworked, inept, or both.

A lot of this hinges on how sloppy and mistake prone banks are, how all of the overworked/inept AP/AR departments have to work with the AP/AR departments of other outfits who are in the same boat, how ridiculous credit card companies are with their "expense account" offerings, and how too many vendors think "we'll just keep charging them and hope they don't notice" is a valid business model.

These scams work on companies because messing up the amount on a check and it not clearing is only MARGINAL stupidity compared to the day-to-day operations they deal with. If the scammers spell the company name right, they're one up on most accounts payable departments.

[-] exscape@kbin.social 7 points 9 months ago

What a bizarrely specific scam. Shouldn't take too long until everyone in that line of work in a particular area catches up on it.

[-] deranger@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

Overpayment and asking for cash back is one of the most common scams, it’s hardly specific. You can replace tree felling with just about anything. They’re just the latest victims.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] invertedspear@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago

The scam is old AF, it’s just new targets. If you’ve tried to sell a car in the last 20 years, you’ve dealt with someone trying to pull it. Or rent a room or house, there’s a reason Airbnb is popular with owners, even for long term situations.

[-] fox2263@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

This sounds like the shittest scam ever and one that is very easy to avoid.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
292 points (97.7% liked)

News

23376 readers
3142 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS