284
submitted 7 months ago by psychothumbs@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 64 points 7 months ago

I'm not sure why the Starbucks unionizing effort has excited me so much. I will never have the opportunity to join a union in my field with 100% certainty - but damn do I want to see them continue to bloody Starbucks' nose!

[-] bstix@feddit.dk 39 points 7 months ago

Even if unionizing your current employment is uphill, you might still want to work somewhere else one day. It always makes sense to support whatever union is closest to your field by joining the union.

You will also likely benefit from others being unionised. F..i. when Starbucks needs to honor decent employment terms, everyone in the barista field will need to match it or fall behind on employing, because who the hell wants to apply for a job that pays less?

Union membership is good karma that way.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

You will also likely benefit from others being unionised. F…i. when Starbucks needs to honor decent employment terms, everyone in the barista field will need to match it or fall behind on employing, because who the hell wants to apply for a job that pays less?

That raises a question I've been wondering about for a while: why do we keep hearing about unions for specific companies, and not "all baristas" (or even "all fast food workers," for that matter)?

[-] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

Gotta start somewhere. Other baraistas and fast food workers might look at what's happening and decided to fight to unionize themselves. Just give it time

[-] bstix@feddit.dk 4 points 7 months ago

That's very country specific and historical. It depends on how it was started hundreds of years ago and what laws were written back then.

Generally, the idea of union agreements is that working terms need to be introduced in agreement rather than forced by law.

The original intention was to not make the government decide wages and working hours, but instead to allow employer and employees to agree without interference from politics.

There are other more politically regulated ways to do it though.

F.i. France, which is known for strong protests, doesn't actually have a high percentage of unionised workers. However, their laws make it mandatory for all companies to follow the union agreements. While this sounds great, it's also the reason why they protest angrily every time something is changed, because the unions can't control what the non-members do. So instead of negotiating, they end up fighting.

Another example of things being different is in Sweden and Finland where they have layered agreements, where any company registering to operate in a given sector is legally obliged to follow the agreement for that sector. The individual union agreements comes on top. Whenever the union agreements in a sector have the same terms, those terms are then risened to the sector agreement, that everyone has to follow. This is a good way to do it. They also introduced this models with experience from other countries first.

It's extremely difficult to go back and change the way it's done on this basic level. For a lot of countries it would be a radical constitutional change.

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

You are the only person I've seen ever (and consistently) abbreviate "for instance"

[-] spizzat2@lemm.ee 8 points 7 months ago

It always makes sense to support whatever union is closest to your field by joining the union.

Wait... Can you just, like, join a random union? I assumed you had to work in the same industry, at least.

[-] bstix@feddit.dk 4 points 7 months ago

Well yes sure you can, but i wouldn't choose any random union. I'd choose the one that has (or has a chance of making) an agreement with the company I'm working at or in the field I have an interest in working in.

Say you're an educated nurse but temporarily working as a retail assistant or unemployed or whatever. IMO it would still make the most sense to be a member of the nurse union if that's where you want to work.

it has to be an actual union though. In Europe we have a bit of an issue with fake unions.. basically companies pretending to offer the same service, but can't make agreements. It can be difficult to see through the bullshit.

[-] n2burns@lemmy.ca 22 points 7 months ago

To me, it's exciting because they're showing success at one of the hardest workplaces to organizing labour. Starbucks Workers United seems to have everything going against them:

  • employees are more likely than at other workplaces to be short/medium-term, so it might be hard to convince employees to think about the long-term
  • each store have relatively few employees but they're going up against one of the biggest corporations in the world
  • Starbucks is general seen as a "pretty good job", so it's got to be hard to convince employees to not just accept whatever they're offered.

Yet, they're persisting!

[-] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

I haven’t been tabs on the Star Bucks union but I am glad it hasn’t fizzled out yet.

this post was submitted on 29 Feb 2024
284 points (98.6% liked)

News

23190 readers
2887 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS