263

Trump's Lawyer Says It'd Be 'Unfair' to Make Him Face Consequences Before Election (www.rollingstone.com)

submitted 8 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

22 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The former president was in Florida on Friday, where a federal judge he appointed signaled she could push back the trial in his classified documents case

The start date for the Florida trial on Donald Trump‘s mishandling of classified documents is in the hands of a judge the former president appointed to the federal circuit.

The trial, currently scheduled to begin May 20, is likely to be delayed after prosecutors and defense attorneys met at a federal courthouse in Fort Pierce, Florida, on Friday.

U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, appointed by Trump to the Southern District of Florida in 2020, said the timeline proposed by prosecutors for a trial this summer was “unrealistic.”

The hearing ended Friday without a new start date, though Cannon said the proposed schedule needs “some space” and “flexibility,” according to CNN.

all 23 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] rdyoung@lemmy.world 108 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

This is the difference between the two sides.

The right thinks that the rules don't apply to them.

The left takes even the smallest infractions way more seriously than they need to. I'm still pissed off about Franken. Pretty sure Biden didn't do a damn thing to protect his son aside from just being his father as most good parents would do regardless of their innocence or guilt.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 41 points 8 months ago

Also take a look at the recent Special Counsel investigations. Democratic AGs gave wide berths to the investigations into Clinton and Biden, and those reports exonerated the people involved, but had nasty editorial asides that did permanent damage to both campaigns.

Meanwhile, the investigation into Trump found serious issues, but Barr massaged the thing so that Trump could say it "totally exonerated" him.

If playing by the rules gives you a stark disadvantage, but breaking the rules brings no punishment, then the only reason to follow rules is your internal moral code. Republicans seem to conveniently ignore their self-professed morals whenever they need to gain an advantage.

[-] rdyoung@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

Oh yeah, I remember the Clinton investigation. Literally the only thing they could get him on was perjury over something that should never been a public issue. They kept looking and looking until they found something to "get him" on and wasted fuck knows how much money and resources doing it.

I'm really hoping (but not expecting) the dems to grow some metaphorical balls and after this election (assuming Biden wins) they go even deeper into the shit the right has been doing for decades and lock as many as them up or at least get them barred from politics, law, whatever for eternity.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

I was thinking of the other Clinton, though, and her buttery males. That investigation ended in a finger wag, yet it was instrumental in her defeat. (Well, that, and the fact she has the charisma of plain cheerios which have sat in the milk for too long.)

[-] rdyoung@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Oh yeah, I guess that one was so inconsequential that I forgot about it for a minute. It really was stupid, yes, she was wrong and security is important but she wasn't and isn't the only one not focused on security.

[-] DandomRude@lemmy.world 61 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I think it is unfair to not make him face the consequences of his actions.

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 41 points 8 months ago

Why is a judge Trump appointed overseeing his case?

[-] MisterD@lemmy.ca 29 points 8 months ago

There are only 3 federal judges in Florida So Trump has a 1-in-3 chance of getting Cannon

There are openings for more but when Biden tries to appoint one, the Republicans in Florida block it.

This way, Trump is more likely to get judge Cannon

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 38 points 8 months ago

The conservatives packing the courts through obstruction when they aren't in power and then rushing them through when they are is underreported. Hell, two of the current SCOTUS are prime examples of that very thing.

[-] klemptor@startrek.website 5 points 8 months ago

She should have to recuse herself.

[-] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 30 points 8 months ago

He's an expert on fairness, everybody says that.

https://time.com/5597843/central-park-five-trump-history/

Oh no, I'm wrong. He's the one that demanded the death penalty for some boys that he deemed guilty because they were black. He's the one that spent tens of thousands of dollars on an ad SCREAMING his poison into the world.

Fairness my ass.

[-] Nusm@yall.theatl.social 10 points 8 months ago

And when they were proven innocent, he simply doubled down.

[-] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 8 months ago

Because he's so fair. We should honor his fairness and demand the same treatment.

[-] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 27 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Unfair of James Comey to make a statement about Hillary before the election too.

[-] Sylver@lemmy.world 25 points 8 months ago

Yeah sure, so long as I get a free card to do whatever the fuck I want until MY election, as well. In like 40 years. Fuck that traitor.

[-] Kyatto@leminal.space 18 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

"boohoo life's unfair" - my conservative father

get over it rich boi, life's what we make it and I say we make life better for the working class for once in my miserable life.

[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

(number of indicted and convicted rapists, insurrectionists or otherwise criminals applying to run for president dramatically rises...)

This is beyond stupid.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 8 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:

The start date for the Florida trial on Donald Trump‘s mishandling of classified documents is in the hands of a judge the former president appointed to the federal circuit.

The trial, currently scheduled to begin May 20, is likely to be delayed after prosecutors and defense attorneys met at a federal courthouse in Fort Pierce, Florida, on Friday.

The prosecution, led by special counsel Jack Smith, is investigating 40 federal charges against Trump over his handling of the classified documents after leaving office, which were found at Mar-a-Lago in Florida instead of being turned over to the National Archives as is required by law.

Earlier this week, Cannon ruled against Trump’s co-defendants being able to view any of the classified documents in the case, writing “the Court finds that the Special Counsel has met his burden.”

Rolling Stone reported on Thursday that Trump’s team was “literally popping champagne” after the Supreme Court decided to take up the case, aware that the decision means it won’t be something they have to contend with ahead of the election.

Trump’s financial crimes trial centering around hush money payments to porn star Stormy Daniels ahead of the 2016 election, is on track to begin jury selection on March 25.

The original article contains 488 words, the summary contains 205 words. Saved 58%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

It would be unfair to humanity to delay and stall the trials any further.

[-] FReddit@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Just put a period after "consequences" and you've trumpledouchkin's out look on life.

[-] TengoDosVacas@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

McConnell: Let the American people decide!

Obama, Democrats: You're on!

trump: and for the first of my three SCOTUS picks....

[-] AlwaysNowNeverNotMe@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago

It was unfair for Obama to let him run without a plan to comply with the emoluments clause.

this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2024

263 points (96.5% liked)

politics

19103 readers

1920 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News